dudalb
Penultimate Amazing
Frankly, if they met, I think Hal would be 100% in the right to go Buzz Aldrin on Yankee 451
Well all the 'automatic revolvers' that I know of (both the Mateba and Webley-Fossbery) are/were European; they relied on recoil forces to cycle.A revolver operates mechanically to chamber the next round and will do so even if you dry fire it. At least all the revolvers I have ever used.
What we really should be asking is African or European revolvers?![]()
There was nothing in season when the fire started. This smells like anti gun garbage. If he was hunting he was poaching.
Personally, I think it was law enforcement burning a grow-op and it got
out of control. Either that or they used a predator drone and are
trying to cover it up.
Typical, the federal government always finds a scapegoat to cover for its total incompetence and mismanagement.
So he answered his own question?There was nothing in season when the fire started. This smells like anti gun garbage. If he was hunting he was poaching.
1) They don't "burn a grow-op." Only a moron would intentionally start a (freaking huge) fire in the wilderness during fire season.Personally, I think it was law enforcement burning a grow-op and it got out of control. Either that or they used a predator drone and are trying to cover it up.
Because as we know, no hunter has ever accidentally started a huge fire?Typical, the federal government always finds a scapegoat to cover for its total incompetence and mismanagement.
.....A revolver operates mechanically to chamber the next round and will do so even if you dry fire it. At least all the revolvers I have ever used.
What we really should be asking is African or European revolvers?![]()
I have to wonder if he thinks they are shooting hellfires in the wilderness for no reason.
Someone just failed their "Geek Credit Check."Philth53 said:.....A revolver operates mechanically to chamber the next round and will do so even if you dry fire it. At least all the revolvers I have ever used.
This is only true of a double action revolver. IE, each time you pull the trigger, the revolver fires, then rotates the cylinder for the next round. A single action revolver requires cocking the trigger to rotate the cylinder for the next shot.
What we really should be asking is African or European revolvers?![]()
It doesn't matter where they are made, there are only two revolver designs, single action and double action.
Phil
No. Excluding the rare automatic revolvers (like the Mateba and WF I mentioned), both double and single action rely on the firer to rotate the cylinder.This is only true of a double action revolver. IE, each time you pull the trigger, the revolver fires, then rotates the cylinder for the next round. A single action revolver requires cocking the trigger to rotate the cylinder for the next shot.
It doesn't matter where they are made, there are only two revolver designs, single action and double action.
Phil
What this all has to do with rocketry is, I suspect, the whole "You need something to push against" conundrum they're dealing with over there. He thinks that, since we obviously (to him, at least) need a person to hold the gun for it to cycle properly, we obviously (to him, at least) need something for the rocket to push against.
Where he fails is twofold: Not realizing that, for the reasons we've discussed, an automatic pistol really isn't a good analogy for a rocket, and also not realizing that, if we wanted to, we could design a gun that could fire and cycle under these conditions.
I think the more important failing is that the question actually proves that rockets work. A gun floating in zero gravity won't cycle properly and will instead go flying in the opposite direction from the bullet exactly like a rocket. By trying to claim that a rocket won't work unless you have something to push against, he actually demonstrates that a rocket is exactly what you get if you don't have something to push against.
No. Excluding the rare automatic revolvers (like the Mateba and WF I mentioned), both double and single action rely on the firer to rotate the cylinder.
In a 'double action' this is done by trigger pressure, which re-cocks the hammer, rotates the cylinder and drops the hammer; a 'single action' relies on the firer pulling back the hammer ("thumbing") to rotate the cylinder to ready the weapon for firing.
I think the more important failing is that the question actually proves that rockets work. A gun floating in zero gravity won't cycle properly and will instead go flying in the opposite direction from the bullet exactly like a rocket. By trying to claim that a rocket won't work unless you have something to push against, he actually demonstrates that a rocket is exactly what you get if you don't have something to push against.
Catsmate is denying what any reasonable person would see is true from the evidence show as per the pellets.
I consider this a concession of the debate.
I've won.
Thanks.
I thought gravity was a function of air pressure. No air, no gravity. I am fairly certain that there is a post somewhere around here that pretty clearly establishes this...It pushes againstthe air. No air, nothing to push. Zero Gravity is just a means of suspending the gun in mid air. or, mid space as it were.
I thought gravity was a function of air pressure. No air, no gravity. I am fairly certain that there is a post somewhere around here that pretty clearly establishes this...
What we really should be asking is African or European revolvers?![]()
It doesn't matter where they are made, there are only two revolver designs, single action and double action.
Phil
A gun floating in zero gravity won't cycle properly
WHOOSH
That went over your head like a fully laden swallow.
Edit: oh, never mind.
Yeah, yeah. Next time I'll just not post anything.
Phil