September 2007 Stundie Nominations

maccy said:
This one is probably a bit too long for a Stundie, but it boggles my mind:

http://winterpatriot.blogspot.com/2007/09/cat-101-introduction-to-conspiracy-and.html

If there's anything worse than plain stupid, it's stupid trying to be clever.
Click to expand...



Wow, he just goes downhill from there. Here are some of the "coincidences" that he complains about:

Who scheduled all the wargames that took the Air Force away from the Eastern Seaboard that day? Did Osama bin Laden schedule the wargames?

118 first responders (fire and medical personnel) who were at Ground Zero on the mor[n]ing of 9/11, reported seeing or hearing bombs or explosions in the bui[ld]ings before they crumbled. Why is that? Is this a conspiracy o[f] eyewitnesses?

Why did Bush and Cheney insist on testifying together, and not under oath, and why did they insist that no notes of their testimony could be kept? If they weren't trying to hide anything, why would they act like they were trying to hide something?
Click to expand...


They aren't even coincidences, at least as I uderstand the term. And of course, he seems to think that disagreeing with his interpretation of any of the above is just exactly like arguing that 2+2 doesn't equal 4.....
 
defaultdotxbe said:
lyte trip, on his flyover theory



craigs inaction (in not presenting his evidence to the proper authorities and sitting on his so-called "researchers edition" video while he trolls forums) of course, speaks no volumes
Click to expand...

What action, by "us," is supposed to be undertaken anyways?
 
Tbone said:
What action, by "us," is supposed to be undertaken anyways?
Click to expand...
That's easy.

1) Select a 9/11 victim (other than Lloyd England: he's spoken for) who was nearly killed by the attacks.

2) Accuse that person of complicity in the attacks.

3) Sit back and enjoy being one of the nastiest creeps on the planet.

Is that too much to ask?
 
Gravy said:
That's easy.

1) Select a 9/11 victim (other than Lloyd England: he's spoken for) who was nearly killed by the attacks.

2) Accuse that person of complicity in the attacks.

3) Sit back and enjoy being one of the nastiest creeps on the planet.

Is that too much to ask?
Click to expand...

I think Tbone's comment was in response to Craigs statement that skeptics don't take action. So, by "us", he meant skeptics. t'least that's how I read it.
 
qarnos said:
I think Tbone's comment was in response to Craigs statement that skeptics don't take action. So, by "us", he meant skeptics. t'least that's how I read it.
Click to expand...
and i think gravy is (sarcastically) indicating that we should be taking the same action craig himself is taking
 
defaultdotxbe said:
and i think gravy is (sarcastically) indicating that we should be taking the same action craig himself is taking
Click to expand...
Yes. He Whose Name Shall Not be Uttered has repeatedly requested that we join him in his despicable campaign or go down in history as being complicit in the attacks.
 
From Swing Dangler, in the thread where he's been arguing that there were enough and specific warnings for the administration to do something, and wherein Billdave gave him a mock warning that actually had MORE information than any the administration received.

Swing Dangler said:
You need to narrow that warning down a bit.

------------------------------------------------------------

No but if Billdave 2 tells me this guy and his friend's names, where he and his friends resides, his connections to other murders, the type of weapon he was going to use, that he had been training with the weapon of choice, how he was going to get to his target, his potential targets, that he had been under surveillance for some time, and people from around the globe were sharing similar information with me, and that this person was going to attack very soon, you darn well bet I'm going to be proactive.
Click to expand...

Yet again proving that there is a double standard twoofers apply to us and themselves; THEY can be vague and unspecified, but let us point out that the warnings received were ALSO vague and unspecified, and look out!
 
maccy said:
This one is probably a bit too long for a Stundie, but it boggles my mind:

http://winterpatriot.blogspot.com/2007/09/cat-101-introduction-to-conspiracy-and.html

If there's anything worse than plain stupid, it's stupid trying to be clever.
Click to expand...

Horatius said:
Wow, he just goes downhill from there. Here are some of the "coincidences" that he complains about:

They aren't even coincidences, at least as I uderstand the term. And of course, he seems to think that disagreeing with his interpretation of any of the above is just exactly like arguing that 2+2 doesn't equal 4.....
Click to expand...

Look, Horatius, there are universes where we are famous:

http://winterpatriot.blogspot.com/2007/09/cat-102-intermediate-coincidence-and.html

It's almost as good as being big in Japan.

I've left a comment clearing up his misunderstandings about the relationship between the JREF and the forum. I'll leave the comments about reading comprehension to others...
 
Unsecured Coins said:
chucksheen convinces me



http://z10.invisionfree.com/Loose_Change_Forum/index.php?showtopic=15120
Click to expand...
well im convinced





......that they didnt look upon the ark of the covenant
mo_82.jpg
 
Gravy said:
Yes. He Whose Name Shall Not be Uttered has repeatedly requested that we join him in his despicable campaign or go down in history as being complicit in the attacks.
Click to expand...
Which side has better cookies? All my decisions are based on this simple question.
 
CptColumbo said:
Which side has better cookies? All my decisions are based on this simple question.
Click to expand...
I would ask which side has free food. Usually, the NWO spares no expense, but we are coming to the time of the annual budget. If the twoofers have cookies, I'm all for it!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom