September 2007 Stundie Nominations

Jon Gold finally answers the question, "[W]ho is going to be part of this 'independent investigation'?"

Sort of...

Jon Gold said:
That's not for me to decide. I would imagine family members would be involved in some way.
Click to expand...
 
Posted by A-Train in the NORAD thread.

I don't believe it. I believe the messages were broadcast by the real hijackers, who were not Arabs, but broadcast them intentionally over the freq while trying to sound like Arabs-- for the purpose of framing Arabs for the hijackings.
Click to expand...

Stupidity such as this is only dwells in mom and dad's basement.
 
Crungy said:
Posted by A-Train in the NORAD thread.

I don't believe it. I believe the messages were broadcast by the real hijackers, who were not Arabs, but broadcast them intentionally over the freq while trying to sound like Arabs-- for the purpose of framing Arabs for the hijackings.
Click to expand...

Stupidity such as this is only dwells in mom and dad's basement.
Click to expand...


Why didn't they just use the voice morphing technology they used to fake the passenger calls with? :rolleyes:
 
Here's more comedy from A-Train's parents basement.

Here's what really happened: the hijackers-- the ones who took out the pilots-- looked and dressed like you and me. They may have had pilot credentials. They gained the trust of the pilots, then quickly took them out with shots to the head from a silencer-equipped gun. On UAL93, the hijacker was probably already in the jump seat when the warning was broadcast to bar the door.
Click to expand...
 
Here's a good tag-team Stundie. I do so hope he brings this up in class!

Andoo Inc. at LCF:


Yeah, I have an engineering professor who works for FEMA. Needless to say I'm very cautious to say anything especially when he brought up the towers last week in class and how the planes destroyed the fireproofing of the steel. It's a materials class and he is teaching it, so I can't really start like trying to defend anything without bringing up white flashes and explosives.
Click to expand...

Followed up by smeagul75:

question him calmly on exactly when the periodic table of elements was proven wrong......seeing as jet fuels burning point is nowhere near steels melting point...thats just junior high science....lol
Click to expand...
 
Well, I'm surprised no one else has nominated CJOKUSAP yet.
CJOKUSAP said:
Come on guys, and the very odd gal, don't ignore me, make me shut up. It shouldn't be too hard. I'm only an ignorant, semi-literate apologist for murderous, god-less Arabs.
Click to expand...
The fact that it's on JREF makes it even funnier: I don't believe it's actually occurred to him yet that a group with a high percentage of atheists might not use "godless" as an insult.
 
TjW said:
Well, I'm surprised no one else has nominated CJOKUSAP yet.

The fact that it's on JREF makes it even funnier: I don't believe it's actually occurred to him yet that a group with a high percentage of atheists might not use "godless" as an insult.
Click to expand...


The "god-less Arab" thing just doesn't make any sense either, especially if he's playing off of some peoples' characterization of truthers as Islamic extremist apologists.
 
TjW said:
Well, I'm surprised no one else has nominated CJOKUSAP yet.

The fact that it's on JREF makes it even funnier: I don't believe it's actually occurred to him yet that a group with a high percentage of atheists might not use "godless" as an insult.
Click to expand...


An insult towards religious fanatics no less!
 
This one is probably a bit too long for a Stundie, but it boggles my mind:

Winter Patriot said:
Here's the interesting thing about Coincidences and Anomalies: If you're a good Coincidence and Anomaly Theorist (CAT) you never have to admit anything.

I say 2 + 2 = 4.

CAT says no it isn't.

I take two balls and put them on the table. Then I take two more balls and put them on the table. Then I count the balls. 1, 2, 3, 4. Here's my proof, I say: 2 + 2 = 4.

CAT says no it isn't.

But I just laid it out on the table, says I. That's the proof.

CAT says no that's just a coincidence.

So I do it again. Get the same answer. Is that a coincidence too? I ask.

CAT says no that's an anomaly.

Turns out you can pile up as many coincidences as you like and CAT says that's just an anomaly. Or you can pile up a bunch of anomalies and CAT says that's just a coincidence.
Click to expand...
http://winterpatriot.blogspot.com/2007/09/cat-101-introduction-to-conspiracy-and.html

If there's anything worse than plain stupid, it's stupid trying to be clever.
 
lyte trip, on his flyover theory

Lyte Trip said:
Give it up?

It happened, duder.

We have confirmed it. Your inaction speaks volumes.
Click to expand...

craigs inaction (in not presenting his evidence to the proper authorities and sitting on his so-called "researchers edition" video while he trolls forums) of course, speaks no volumes
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom