September 2007 Stundie Nominations

[JamesB]

"We're not allowed in the Port Authority but 5 of the hijackers were allowed to train at naval bases to fly airplanes"

-Unknown troofer at We Are Change rally in NYC on 9/11/2007-

 

[maccy]

What happened to Malcolm Kirkman?

I'm worried that he may have undertaken some grand and disastrous experiment to demonstrate that gravity does not exist in a vacuum.

 

[volatile]

I just fell about laughing at this gem, wherein MjD redefines the word "censorship":

The fact that artilcles have appeared doesnt do anyting to show that it hasnt been overwhelmingly censored. Public opinion shows this. And this is overwhelmingly one sided.

but then noticed it was posted in August. Just ignore me; carry on as normal.

 

[NYCEMT86]

I was under the impression that nukes may have been used at the WTC because of molten metal in the basement and because of the nanoparticles flying everywhere as well as victims with dripping skin.

http://z10.invisionfree.com/Loose_Change_Forum/index.php?showtopic=15479

 

[CptColumbo]

I'm worried that he may have undertaken some grand and disastrous experiment to demonstrate that gravity does not exist in a vacuum.

I still giggle when I think of that.

 

[Dave Rogers]

http://z10.invisionfree.com/Loose_Change_Forum/index.php?showtopic=15405 (sorry, I still can't figure out how to do proper links to LCF posts)

Discobee at his finest here, commenting on Keith Seffen's paper on the WTC collapses:

I don't even have to read his paper - I know the context within which it is appearing. I know its purpose and I know that its conclusions are false.

How better to sum up the truther mentality?

Dave

 

[Firestone]

I think I found a loophole in Mobyseven's rules.

So before he fixes it for next month, I nominate this bizarre evidence for 9/11 as an inside job:

9-11 is gepleegd door de Amerikaanse regering, let wel.. er zijn geen overlevenden onder de vliegtuigpassagiers.

In the unlikely case someone here doesn't understand Dutch, here a translation:

"9-11 was committed by the American government, notice ... there are no survivors among the plane passengers."

Link

 

[Belz...]

I just fell about laughing at this gem, wherein MjD redefines the word "censorship":

So "censorship" now means that people don't believe it ?


Why was the flat earth theory censored ?????

 

[Belz...]

How better to sum up the truther mentality?

Yeah, they should make a sweater out of that.

Front: "I don't need facts"

Back: "I just _know_ it"

 

[volatile]

So "censorship" now means that people don't believe it ?

Whatever it means, it certainly doesn't mean "the information has not appeared in the press", apparently.

 

[Belz...]

Which in turn doesn't mean "it was prevented from being published."


I just love fundies.

 

[Bell]

<snip>

Link

And how about the next post on that board:

En bovendien weten we al lang dat Moslims niet achter 9/11 zaten, hoe zouden die gebouw 7 kunnen neerbrengen bv.

Translation: And above all we know for a long time that Muslims were not behind 9/11, how could they have brought down building 7 for example?

 

[MortFurd]

What happened to Malcolm Kirkman?

This.

 

[Spindrift]

Another brilliant explanation why AA77 couldn't have hit the Pentagon.



http://z10.invisionfree.com/Loose_Change_Forum/index.php?showtopic=15305

I can just see him testing his "hypothesis".

Hypothesis: The building was made of material denser than the airplane. So when airplane hits building it should bounce off.

Step 1) Make paper airplane.

Step 2) Throw at wall in bedroom in mom's house. Make sure to throw really hard because AA77 was going pretty fast.

Result: paper airplane bounced off wall without making a mark in the wall. Therefore AA77 should have bounced off the Pentagon.

 

[Horatius]

I think I've found the ultimate Stundie......Just wait for it, you'll see why:

I went to Ground Zero on 9/11 this year, and I had a great time, met tons of great people, and felt that we made a great presence overall.

The only bad thing was there was this guy with a huge sign there that said "USA DID 911". I thought this was a terrible representation of what we all stand for, and felt that he was there to make us look bad.

If that guy goes on these forums and didn't mean to misrepresent us, i'm sorry, but i don't feel that having a sign that says "USA DID 911" is a good way to introduce people to what happened on 9/11 and will only furthur instigate violence and anger among the people in NYC.

So what's so Stundielicious about this?



It was posted by the user "911wasaninsidejob"

 

[Cl1mh4224rd]

I swear... I read that and everything got quiet. Like the whole of the universe ground to halt in sheer disbelief of itself.

 

[Alareth]

I think I've found the ultimate Stundie......Just wait for it, you'll see why:






So what's so Stundielicious about this?



It was posted by the user "911wasaninsidejob"

Create you own error messages!

 

[LashL]

This isn't actually a Stundie nomination as it doesn't quite fit within the guidelines, but I'm posting it here because of the sheer audacity, delusion, and unintended irony of Do-Over Dylan's response.

In this LCF thread about Nico Haupt:

Look, I've spoken with Nico many times. No one disputes that he's done really good research on 9/11. But that doesn't make him immune to critique of an absolutely ridiculous theory that does more harm than good.

Or the fact that accuses numerous members of the 9/11 truth movement of being either 1) government agents, 2) actors, or 3) complicit in the murder of 3,000 people.

The man needs to go. If I stooped to such a ridiculous low I'd hope people would call me on it.

So, according to Dylan Avery, it is okay for him and other members of the Truth^_TM movement to accuse thousands of innocent people of being "either 1) government agents, 2) actors, or 3) complicit in the murders of 3,000 people," but it's not okay to accuse members of the Truth^_TM movement of any of those things.

As for Dylan stooping to such a ridiculous low, he has repeatedly sunk far, far lower than that ("Boxcutters, hahahahahaha!!"; Accusing Bernard Brown of being "deeply involved in it" and "sending his son off to die" while he went and played golf; "Flight 11 and Flight 77 didn't exist"; Mark Bingham's mother is a liar; "The cell phone calls were fake, no question about it." etc., etc., etc.) and he hates that people have called him on it.

If Dylan were to apply his own standards to himself, it seems that he "needs to go" too.

Edit to add link: http://z10.invisionfree.com/Loose_Change_Forum/index.php?showtopic=15519 (Scroll down about 1/3 of the page for Dylan Avery's post)

 

[Belz...]

I think I've found the ultimate Stundie......Just wait for it, you'll see why:

So what's so Stundielicious about this?



It was posted by the user "911wasaninsidejob"

I think what he meant to say is that "USA" didn't "do" 9/11, but the government did. Something like that.

 

[Belz...]

So, according to Dylan Avery, it is okay for him and other members of the Truth^_TM movement to accuse thousands of innocent people of being "either 1) government agents, 2) actors, or 3) complicit in the murders of 3,000 people," but it's not okay to accuse members of the Truth^_TM movement of any of those things.

For the "tm", all you need is the "sup" tag.

If Dylan were to apply his own standards to himself, it seems that he "needs to go" too.

If he applied that to himself, he'd probably vanish from existence.