• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

September 2007 Stundie Nominations

Mobyseven

Philosopher
Joined
Nov 5, 2006
Messages
5,671
Well, good golly gosh, it's 'that' time of the month again, and so time for the rules and whatnot.

I'm moving around a bit this month, just so you know. Got to go to Sydney until mid-October ("What was that mum? 'Lectures'? Never heard of 'em!"), and while I'll have the interwebs I probably won't be on as often. I'll still be around though, so you'd better all adhere to dem rules...

  1. Nominations from the JREF forums are allowing, but will not be as highly regarded as nominations from other sources, be they on or off the interwebs. The finalists will contain a maximum of 25% nominations from the JREF forums; 75-100% must be from nominations external to the JREF forums.
  2. Nominations should always be accompanied by a link or a screenshot, to confirm that the quote exists and has not been taken out of context. (It would be wise to always have a backup screenshot, as truth movement forums are well known for deleting entire threads.)
  3. For a nomination to be eligible, it must have a real and obvious link to conspiracy theories, but not exclusively 9/11 conspiracy theories.
  4. Stundie nominations should 'stand alone'. Do not over-embellish introductions, but do provide comments. Do not use any blatant ad hominem attacks.
  5. Please post the nomination under the real screenname of the nominee, and not under a slightly altered name (e.g. Killclown, Roxpup, Do-over).
  6. The best Stundie nominations are short and sweet. As a guideline, no more than 6 lines should be included from the post. If you are giving context, highlight the actual nomination.
  7. Entire videos or audio clips are not eligible for nomination. Specific statements or claims from videos or audio clips are eligible for nomination.
  8. No long rants. Cut them down to the funniest bit.
  9. No speeling mistikes or tie-pose. Everybody makes a mistake once in a while!

Remember that the truther mantra applies here - if you aren't sure about something, "Ask questions, demand answers."

So get cracking with those nominations, and say 'Hi!' to your dad from me this Sunday!

Mobyseven

Democratically Elected Tyrant
 
OldSchool, for having the "higest" literacy in his class.

Took an entrance exam yesterday for a CSS "Computer Systems Specialist" at a private Technical College. On the entrance exam I recieved 90 out of 100 on every test. My literacy score was the higest with 99 out of 100. The written part of the test I recieved the highest possible grade 5 out of 5. So when push comes to shove and i'm in an acedemic setting the scores speak for themselves.

http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showpost.php?p=2924714&postcount=145
 
He's in rare form today. In his next comment, he invents a brand new meaning of "secret."

Any intelligence should have to report to a secret court. A secret court in which the judge is voted into his position. This judges position should be treated the same as a presidential election. All secret agencies should have to report to this court full disclosure to ensure our agencies are operating within Federal and International Law.

E: BTW that's HIS bolding. :p
 
He's in rare form today. In his next comment, he invents a brand new meaning of "secret."
E: BTW that's HIS bolding. :p
Ah, but if all the names are blanked out on the ballots....

100,000 intelligence agents having to clear their activities through a single judge? Makes sense to me.
 
OldSchool, for having the "higest" literacy in his class.

On the entrance exam I recieved 90 out of 100 on every test. My literacy score was the higest with 99 out of 100.


He got 90 out of 100 on every test, except for the one where he got 99 out of 100? I guess one of those wasn't a math test......


Is there a prize for the most Stundies in one nomination?
 
In team handball a player can run three steps while holding the ball.

True, but in team handball, there isn't an ``our'' court and a ``their'' court, the way there would be in tennis or volleyball or some other game involving a net separating the sides of the court...
 
Phil Jayden over at Loose change, cracks the whole conspiracy wide open

All of America's top 500 corporations are operated by the elite. Which is why you find so many of their fancy stupid NWO symbols in their logos and such. The council of 500, which we know as the Fortune 500 companies, are staffed by the council of 33, which in turn is ruled by the top Mason in the World, Prince Phillip, the husband of the Queen.

You fools you've got it all wrong with your lizard men Phil the Greek is the leader of them all!
 
Originally posted by StreetCornerPhilosopher on abovetopsecret.com

Troy, you should know the answer to that. It is no. Why dislike English people in general, they are enslaved by the same government. It's not Tom, Dick, Harry and Jane's fault. It's the ones in the palace with a higher percentage of alien DNA.

http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread299689/pg3

I always thought Charles' ears didn't correspond to those of any Earth mammal....
 
Found this one on LCF.
bowtononebutone just doesn´t understand why the Naudet-brothers made a documentary about firefighters doing staff and whatever - just on the day of 911. Of course this can`t be coincidence.

What logical purpose was there to filming a fire crew, doing manhole/grating repair(or whatever in the world it was they were doing), on that particular day, at that particular time, at that particular location?

To have something to applaud themselves over? To have a record of witness to their first strike?

Are the Naudet brothers complicit? Are they part of it all?
Hmmm...
He´s not really sure if they`re on to be fair...
Or so it seems.

Heck yeah, something's amiss here.

Burn in Hell, the lot of them!


Source: LCF, The Lounge, Naudet-Brother-Documentary-thread
 
Found this one on LCF.
bowtononebutone just doesn´t understand why the Naudet-brothers made a documentary about firefighters doing staff and whatever - just on the day of 911. Of course this can`t be coincidence.

What logical purpose was there to filming a fire crew, doing manhole/grating repair(or whatever in the world it was they were doing), on that particular day, at that particular time, at that particular location?

To have something to applaud themselves over? To have a record of witness to their first strike?

Are the Naudet brothers complicit? Are they part of it all?

Hmmm...
He´s not really sure if they`re on to be fair...
Or so it seems.

Heck yeah, something's amiss here.

Burn in Hell, the lot of them!


Source: LCF, The Lounge, Naudet-Brother-Documentary-thread


Since you can't post links yet: http://z10.invisionfree.com/Loose_Change_Forum/index.php?showtopic=14935
 

Back
Top Bottom