seeing the light in skepticism

Interesting Ian said:
Thanks TS & hgc.

Should we just turn this thread into an Interesting Ian appreciation thread? :D ;)

I admire the way you stand up for the mistaken ideals that you support. It is admirable, I suppose.

But that wasn't spam, and you were being a jerk. Err, bad choice of words. You were attempting to shut up the opposition via appealing to authorities.

It was hysterical. I want a link to it in the smiley section, it's called for so very often.
 
De'Ville's Advocaat said:
No one wants to know that people are running around who have access to your thoughts, let alone the leaders of any of the major religions, or the politicians, or the criminals, or the blood sucking international fascist capitalists... it makes the governance of society extremely difficult.

Just some editing to show you the problem i see:

No one wants to know that people are running around who have nukes that would kill you, your family, your friends, your whole city and could spell an end to mankind, let alone the leaders of any of the major religions, or the politicians, or the criminals, or the blood sucking international fascist capitalists... it makes the governance of society extremely difficult.

After all, better they scan your thoughts from time to time, than killing you.

So could you explain, why thousands of people, know not only that nukes exist, but also know in principle how to build one?
Why was there no succesful cover up by the "blood sucking international fascist capitalists" or whoever controls the world?
Do you know how painful it is for anybody trying to control a land/world/society, to know that some idiot in a starving third world country could get into position to threaten to destroy some cities?
No secret evil conspiracy ruling circle would accept that in any way, they would want to be the only ones to have access to nukes.

Carn
 
CFLarsen said:
Carn,

De'Ville's Advocaat has been banned. It was Lucianarchy.

Proof was obtained through....?

After all it could have been someone, who was a fervent admirer of Lucianarchy, read all posts and upon seeing that his idol is banned, deciding, that he has to pick up the flag and carry on. Therefore similar style, but maybe he intended to avoid the mistakes, that led to banning.

Not much chance for that, but still what proof is there?

Carn
 
Carn said:
Proof was obtained through....?

After all it could have been someone, who was a fervent admirer of Lucianarchy, read all posts and upon seeing that his idol is banned, deciding, that he has to pick up the flag and carry on. Therefore similar style, but maybe he intended to avoid the mistakes, that led to banning.

Not much chance for that, but still what proof is there?

Carn

Go here
 

Back
Top Bottom