• Security incident: ISF was recently accessed by intruders. Please change your password, and change it anywhere else you used it. Read more
Mammoth Cave National Park Superintendent Patrick Reed announced on June 7, 2006, that reports of cougar sightings within the park have increased in the past nine months. Three reports have been received since September 2005.

“Right now, we don’t have a lot of information,” said Reed. “These are only sightings. We have not recovered any hard evidence of a cougar in the park. The existence of a cougar in Mammoth Cave National Park would be unusual because we are hundreds of miles from where cougars are known to exist. However, for the safety of our visitors, employees, and park neighbors, we’d like to make them aware of the sightings.”

Park staff are in consultation with state and federal officials regarding the likelihood of a native cougar (Puma concolor, also known as mountain lion, puma, panther and catamount) immigrating into the area, or the possibility of a non-native animal being illegally released here. In addition, park staff are attempting to confirm these sightings by obtaining credible field evidence – photo, scat, hair, tracks, or an animal killed by a cougar. Presently, cougar populations can be found in southern Florida, from the Rocky Mountains west to the Pacific coast, the Dakotas, Missouri, and south Texas. Male cougars appear to be expanding their range eastward towards the Mississippi River. A single male cougar’s home range can be from 125 square miles to 175 square miles – Mammoth Cave National Park is 80 square miles.

Park staff are also compiling a list of safety tips based on those used in National Park Service areas where cougars are present:

Always hike, backpack, and camp with a companion. Be aware of your surroundings.

If you see a cougar, make eye contact and stand your ground. Make yourself appear large by shouting and waving your arms. Do not bend over or crouch down. Back away slowly – never run from a cougar; this may trigger their instinct to chase. Fight back aggressively if attacked.

Supervise children closely. Don’t allow them to run ahead or lag behind.

“There have been isolated reports of cougars in the park since the 1960s,” added Reed. “The frequency of the recent cougar sightings, and the fact that some of the reports came from our own staff, has raised our level of attention. If there is a cougar using the park, the level of risk to humans is likely to be very low. Mammoth Cave National Park is a natural place – it is not tame. Be aware and respectful of all the park inhabitants – butterfly or tick, wildflower or poison ivy, raccoon or possibly a cougar.”

(News release courtesy of The National Park Service.) Header from Cryptomundo
 
I don't think we should be surprised that Mammoth Cave put out that statement given that cougars have recently been confirmed even farther from their source population. What's your point, that cougars were never *really* hunted out of Kentucky?
 
WP,

To my knowledge there are no confirmed resident cougars in KY. IIRC, a good many years back a cougar was killed on a highway, w/o any tattoo ID, but with DNA suggesting a South American origin. I may be wrong on the details, tho.

There was a project carried out @ the Land Between the Lakes with game cams to try and establish the existence of cougars in KY. No cougar photos if memory serves.

That "mountain lions" exist is a commonly held belief by a good many rural residents in my experience, along with "black panthers". I suspect house cats and bobcat are responsible for any such sightings, etc.
 
It looks like there are no confirmed cougars in KY and that includes road killed cougars from any origin. The signs were put up at Mammoth Caves strictly based on unconfirmed sightings. No functional evidence has been found. All you have are anecdotal sightings. It is a fact however that at least some of the sightings have been confirmed to be other species (misidentified).
 
Theres supposed to be a little hairy man in the Philipine jungles and an intensive search failed to find any race of such a creature. People will believe in anything including giant frogs who stand upright like the Loveland frog. You can't disprove it to a bleiever even if the belief is patently absurd.
 
Ah ok. I guess they can't say if it was born in the wild or captivity. Could have been dumped when a pet owner doesn't want to raise or sell offspring. But there is a possibility that it came from wild parents - but even those could be released or escaped pets. It's been 16 years since that one. Authorities can't fully justify any claims that cougars are resident without any confirmatory evidence and we know that where wild cougars live they produce reliable evidence.
 
Yes and it was that map that I consulted along with a general search of dead cougars in KY. Maybe that it was confirmed to have SA ancestry keeps it from being documented by that org. Or maybe there is more to that story than we know.
 
Rattlesnakes don't eat bird eggs, although you didn't mention which species. There's a rat snake already there (KY), black rat snake (Elaphe obsoleta) that is an excellent predator of bird eggs. Years ago in Missouri there was an even more ridiculous story about the state Fish and Game agency dropping rattlesnakes with small parachutes from airplanes.
If I see a Fish and Game agent with a snake on a plane, I'll...
 
The Boa's are moving into South Carolina. The day I go down to the river to fish and see a monster snake curled up in the shallows, or up in a tree, just stick a fork in me, I'm done.
 
Jodie, you are not taking about the Burmese pythons that are so becoming common in Florida now? You really mean Boa, not Python?
 
Great, now I want to see a bigfoot wrestling a Burmese python.

ETA: On the banks of the Chicago River.
 
It looks like there are no confirmed cougars in KY and that includes road killed cougars from any origin. The signs were put up at Mammoth Caves strictly based on unconfirmed sightings. No functional evidence has been found. All you have are anecdotal sightings. It is a fact however that at least some of the sightings have been confirmed to be other species (misidentified).

I'd say a sighting by a wildlife officer and multiple park rangers nailed this one down. If they don't know a cougar/mountain lion when they see one who does? Oh, but maybe they misidentified a raccoon as a Mountain lion. Or possibly they were delusional, seeing things. Maybe they claimed Mountain lion sightings for attention? The pattern of denial is obvious.

Denial is a funny thing. There are still no wolves in KY too. Even though one was confirmed as being shot in KY. The body was brought in.

Then, for some reason the argument shifts to "Well there are no breeding populations" "It must have been an escaped pet."

That's speculation, the fact is a wolf was shot in the wild in KY. It makes no difference how it got there. The point is it is/was there.

I suspect if a Mountain lion is killed, the same argument will surface "There are no breeding populations etc."

So instead of an all out denial it'd probably be the wiser choice to acknowledge some sightings of things in the wild that shouldn't be there, may in fact be very accurate.
 
Theres supposed to be a little hairy man in the Philipine jungles and an intensive search failed to find any race of such a creature. People will believe in anything including giant frogs who stand upright like the Loveland frog. You can't disprove it to a bleiever even if the belief is patently absurd.

And it seems one cannot persuade a denialist even when one produces a body. Funny that.
 
ChrisBFRPKY,

Just wondering if you would comment on this. Within the last few years, self-proclaimed Bigfoot researchers from various organizations have actually succeeded in finding Bigfoot. They go out in the woods and see them or hear them and/or find their tracks or other tell-tale signs. They even observe Bigfoot behavior. Not just one or two lucky researchers, but a whole boatload of researchers from various states. Some even keep the apes/forest people up all night, as they (the apes/forest people) throw rocks and twigs and dirt throughout the night at the researchers' cabin.

The New Bigfoot Researcher must have honed new methodologies in discovering Bigfoot, special techniques not considered over the prior decades and centuries, else the ape/forest person would have been verified to exist long ago. Can you tell us what is so special about the researchers research methods? Have all the field organizations compared notes with one another, since so many have been equally successful in finding Bigfoot? Can you tell us how soon we may expect the final solution to be announced by Bigfoot field researchers. You all seem so close!
 
^So you flat out refuse to acknowledge the opinion of those who examined the wolf that it showed at least one tell-tale sign of having been in captivity? Why?

Re: Mammoth Cave cougars: Other than some ridiculously naive city people or something, I think pretty much every adult in the US knows what a cougar looks like. Where they get into trouble is that they think they've seen one in the wild. Few people ever get really experienced at seeing wild cougars in the wild. Thus the vast majority of people who have erroneously reported out-of-range cougars in the past have been people who know darn well what a cougar looks like: they were just wrong when they thought they saw one in the flesh.
 

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom