You have no facts. You have stories. You can't demonstrate any of your alleged "knowledge." You don't know it; you might not even believe it.

Leave it to a bigfoot proponent (and well known BLAARGer) to be all story and no monkey.
FTFY²¹¹²


²¹¹² I mean, considering the beast doesn't really exist (in accepted reality), can't then pretty much anything Bigfoot that's "all story and no monkey" be considered BLAARGing? ;)
 
Just for reference, I find I seem to have missed the proper definition of the term "blaarging," though its general sense is clear enough. Would someone be kind enough to toss me the "official" meaning of the term?
 
You have no facts. You have stories. You can't demonstrate any of your alleged "knowledge." You don't know it; you might not even believe it.

Leave it to a bigfoot proponent (BLAARGer?) to be all story and no monkey.

Ah, back to "show me the monkey". Unfortunate. Chris B.
 
Ah, back to "show me the monkey". Unfortunate. Chris B.


Yeah because asking someone to back their claims is just silly and a waste of time? You'd much rather discuss a lot of hogwash and brag about your "encounters" without having to answer that. Lets instead discuss some dents in the ground left by "the big guy". Much more entertaining, and educational.

/end puke.

;)
 
Ah, back to "show me the monkey". Unfortunate. Chris B.

Unfortunate for proponents. It's just unbelievable that meenieheads would ask for an example of a 9-ft, 600-lb ape claimed to be running around NA, seen and heard, but no hide nor hair.

If you can't demonstrate you know something, there is no reason for anyone to believe it. None.
 
Last edited:
Ah, back to "show me the monkey". Unfortunate.

Over ten thousand years of human habitation in North America, and not one single shred of unambiguous evidence has been found that supports the existence of bigfoot. No clear, objective, tangible thing has ever been offered by anyone, ever. Evidence for bigfoot that's actually worth anything equals zero.

This is unfortunate if your hobby is belief in bigfoot.
 

We discussed footery as being LARPING
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Live_action_role-playing_game

Decided it has elements of ARG

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alternate_reality_game

then combined.

I think the line that hits the nail on the head for footers is:

"This Is Not A Game (TINAG) – Setting the ARG form apart from other games is the This Is Not A Game sentiment popularized by the players themselves. It is the belief that “one of the main goals of the ARG is to deny and disguise the fact that it isn't even chicken at all.”[5]
 


The funniest part, and most revealing about the "community" of footers is how after the image was exposed to be very old and an obvious mounting board on the bottom pointed out... there were still many footers acting as if this was still real and talking about how afraid she seemed. lol?

It really is funny to watch.
 
The funniest part, and most revealing about the "community" of footers is how after the image was exposed to be very old and an obvious mounting board on the bottom pointed out... there were still many footers acting as if this was still real and talking about how afraid she seemed. lol?

It really is funny to watch.

SweetSusiq said:
She has had a BF clan on her property. My understanding is that the Dogmen are running the BF clan off the property, and the DM have attacked her house.

This from the woman jerrywayne offered as up a prime example of a true bigfoot believer.
 
Headed out of the Ouachita mountains yesterday going to start making my way home :(
Very windy in that part of the world the past few days and wacky weather. Took the Jeep on miles of the county roads.. (jeep trails, fire roads) some where smooth enough for cars...some others not so much. At higher elevations there was a few inches of snow!
This was all in what is rumored to be Area X. Found plenty of cabins only one would have been close to any public road. But this is a huge area to cover. While remote by most standards this is a very well used area, numerous remote "car" camping areas and at the top of one mountain an impromptu town at least 6-10 cabins, one large house and trailers, ect.
This area is easily and often used by locals for recreation. If there's a resident population of Bigfeets my assessment.. one would have been killed a long time ago by locals, or hit by a truck....man they drive fast around here!
Did a little bushwacking but it was just so windy really couldn't hear much and some of the terrain is very steep.
Another area to visit and spend some time IMHO especially if you have a 4wheel drive vehicle which would enable you to get to some really remote areas.
Going to check out a few other spots on my way home and maybe spend the night with the ponies on Mt. Rodgers!
Oh yes I had tremendous trouble sighting cryptoids...in fact I saw none or any evidence of any!
Maybe I should head to Ill. and slay the Dogman...good grief BFF is wacked!!
 
Last edited:
Cervelo,

I've been enjoying your roving reports, thanks for sharing your adventures.

You can't go home yet we have a major situation unfolding 100 miles from Chicago!!
 
While remote by most standards this is a very well used area, numerous remote "car" camping areas and at the top of one mountain an impromptu town at least 6-10 cabins, one large house and trailers, ect.
This area is easily and often used by locals for recreation.

It's not just the locals. The Ouachitas are a prime camping target for the Houston and Dallas/Fort Worth metros. They're used kind of like the way the Adirondacks are a mountain playground for folks from NYC.

I'm also enjoying your reports, Cervelo. Safe travels!
 

Back
Top Bottom