To get back on track...
Ok I have decided to take specific claims by Manchester and examine them specifically. My hope is that either Mr. Ferrant, or possibly Mr. Manchester himself could answer some questions here and clarify any inconsistencies.
I'll start with Mr. Manchester's appearance on the "Is It Real? Vampires" TV program done by the National Geographic Channel. I downloaded this from iTunes for 2 bucks.
At 0:47 in the program Mr. Manchester says:
"The question is not are they real, the question is how do you deal with them?"
So we've established that Mr. Manchester thinks that vampires exist. However his definition of what a vampire is isn't given until later. Further along in the program the narrator says over pictures of Mr. Manchester:
"There is one person at least who claims that vampires are real. The Bishop of the Old Catholic Church at Glastonbury in England. The Right Reverend Sean Manchester."
Followed again by the quote from the beginning of the program I shared above. Ok, so this program is under the impression that Sean Manchester is a bishop of the Old Catholic Church at Glastonbury, England. We can examine this point later. Moving along in the program at 19:05 the Narrator states:
"Bishop Sean Manchester claims to have been called on to excorsize vampires and demons throughout the UK. He is billed as England's leading vampire slayer, a term he rejects. He is, he says, an excorsist and vampires are demons."
Followed by this quote from Manchester:
"Fundamentally the vampire is a predatory demon which is dependent on blood."
So now we've established that tenant of Manchester's belief about vampires. The narrator then sets up the next direct quote by Manchester explaining that he began his career in the 1960's and that there were reports around a cemetery of bloodless animal carcasses, eyewitness reports of red-eyed spectre, and finally an attack on two schoolgirls (they show black and white photos of a girl with two punctures on her neck) and then explain that one of the girls went on to have nightly visitations. Bringing us to this statement in the program by Manchester:
"She betrayed all the recognizeable symptoms and signs of a vampire attack. I saw for myself the puncture marks on her neck, the anemia, the initious (?) anemia...again sleepwalking..."
The narrator then notes that Bishop Manchester at the time was not yet a priest, but he tracked the vampire from the cemetery to an abandoned house nearby where he had an encounter. Manchester then says:
"When you've seen the real thing. When you've looked upon the actual vampire itself it is impossible to remove it from your psyche...from your consciousness, and you're no longer talking about belief but knowledge, experience, observation."
So we have established that according to Manchester vampires, in the form of demons dependent upon blood, exist and that he has seen the victims wounds, that they sleepwalk, and he encountered one in physical form.
After this Manchester is saying "If you believe in God you believe in the Devil, if you believe in angels you believe in demons. You can't have one without the other. Not if you believe in any of it."
Interesting false dichotomy, but not logically defensible. Any number of faiths have no need of devils against angels etc. etc. Does Manchester simply disregard any religious faith that doesn't coincide with his? Moving on...
Toward the end of this program, Manchester is shown saying the following:
"At what point does the theatricality end and unleashing things from the bowels of hell begin? It's not difficult to open a door the problem is shutting it again. The problems is to get back behind that door what you've let in."
Now from what I can make of his appearance on this TV show, we have the following premises to examine:
1) Sean Manchester is represented as a bishop of the Old Catholic Church at Glastonbury, England.
2) Sean Manchester believes vampires exist, are demons that are dependent on blood.
3) Sean Manchester has claimed to have personally encountered a vampire, and has fought it.
4) Sean Manchester apparently thinks making vampire films will bring about more demons and vampires in real life.
I would like to see any source material either of Manchester's books or fhios interviews or appearances that could clarify any of this further to make sure we are absolutely examining what he says and believes, if that is available. If any members happen to have this ready, please post here (but within the confines of Rule 4.)
Moving along, I decided to posit this TV appearance against any material on the internet that may support or contradict Manchesters statements on the TV show.
This horribly designed website, despite being painful to look at due to bad graphics and text color choices, seems to be Manchester's church. At the bottom of
this page, a picture of Manchester is captioned by the following:
Bishop & Primate: The Right Reverend Seán Manchester, O.S.G.
So he's apparently the monkey bishop that works at the Office of the Solicitor General.
No seriously, what significance is "Primate"? Is that another way of saying "founder?" Does anyone know what O.S.G. stands for? a google search didn't give me anything to go on with this.
I did not find on that website any reference to Manchester being the Bishop at Glastonbury of the Old Catholic Church. Nor can I find any source material to confrim or refute this. (I can google up opinions till the cows come home, but that means nothing without some referenced source material.)
I would also like to know what is out there describing the events at Highgate, and if Mr. Ferrant can shed some light on that, I would appreciate it. However one testimonial against another is not much evidence, so I would also like to see some referenced evidence in there.
Specifically:
What exactly does Manchester mean by a "demon that is dependent on blood" and are there any details on how he fought these available? What sources other than Manchester can we find to corroborate or refute what he says?
Thoughts?
ETA:
I did not find on that website any reference to Manchester being the Bishop at Glastonbury of the Old Catholic Church. Nor can I find any source material to confrim or refute this. (I can google up opinions till the cows come home, but that means nothing without some referenced source material.)
The above quote by me is in error. I simply did not understand the oddly worded sections of his webpage.
Here states the following:
The historical continuity of the apostolic succession here imparted cannot be questioned. It can be traced in an unbroken line to the nephew of Pope Urban VIII, Cardinal Antonio Barberini the Younger, prior to which it unfolds backwards to the Holy Apostles and Our Lord Jesus Christ Himself (following the widely known and much published Roman Catholic line).
Later on that page:
When Bishop Seán Manchester was consecrated by Old Catholic Archbishop Illtyd Thomas, assisted by Bishop Michael Weston and Bishop Henry Vermeulen on 4 October 1991 at a Church in Hertfordshire, he inherited multifarious lines of apostolic succession for which the above table is but one single strand in the Old Catholic table alone. He also inherited the Chaldean Catholic line, the Armenian Catholic line, the Russian Orthodox line, the Syrian Orthodox line, the Assyrian line, the Greek-Melkite line, the Syro-Gallican line, the Anglican and Non-Juring lines, etc.
Upon his episcopal consecration Bishop Seán Manchester received congratulations from many church leaders, notably the late Cardinal Basil Hume’s ecumenical advisor for the Roman Catholic Church, Father Michael Seed of the Franciscan Friars of the Atonement, many Eastern Catholic, Eastern Orthodox, and Old Catholic Archbishops, including Archbishop Nils Bertil Alexander Persson of Sweden who stressed the importance of being “able to refer to many different valid successions” when “working ecumenically.” Dr Persson was Primate Emeritus of the Apostolic Episcopal Church and Missionary General to the Philippine Independent Catholic Church (which is in full communion with Canterbury and Utrecht) until his retirement. He was also the Primate VIII of the Order of Corporate Reunion (see below).
I am now googling for Illtyd Thomas to verify Manchester is indeed ordained by the OCT.
And the only Illtyd Thomas I found in any Old Catholic Church appears on
this page of The Old Catholic Church of B.C.
I assume that's British Columbia, Canada? The site is bilingual english and french. They list these places of worship:
Locations and Worship times
St. Raphael's Old Catholic Church
715 East 51st Avenue; Vancouver, BC
Phone (604) 325-9193 FAX (604) 327-1066
email:
oldcatholicbc@hotmail.com
Holy Mass - Sunday 11 am
Every Wednesday 8:30 am
Confession - 30 minutes before Mass
Benediction of the Blessed Sacrament - 4th Sunday of the month after Mass
Our Lady of Nativity Old Catholic Church
8642 Harvie Road; Port Kells, Surrey, BC
Phone (604) 882-8566
Holy Mass - Sunday 11 am
Weekday 8:30 am
confession 30 minutes before Mass
Holy Trinity Anglican Church
17371 NE 24th Street
Redmond, WA 98052
Phone (425) 641-3059
Sunday Services:
8:30 AM - Holy Communion
10:00 AM - Holy Communion (1st, 3rd & 5th Sundays)
10:00 AM - Morning Prayer (2nd & 4th Sundays)
Missions
St. Barbara's Old Catholic Mission, Bellevue, Washington, USA
St. Paul's Old Catholic Mission, Bowen Island, BC
Mission Vieille Catholique de la Sainte Croix; Montreal,P.Q.
Mission Vieille Catholique de Bon Pasteur; Quebec, P.Q
- please call St. Raphael's Old Catholic Church at (604) 325-9193 for location & times -
Sop it appears that Manchester is claiming someone in the OCT in British Columbia ordained him?