They were caught.Trump: "It was carried out poorly"
what the hell is that supposed to mean?
They were caught.Trump: "It was carried out poorly"
what the hell is that supposed to mean?
Trump: "It was carried out poorly"
what the hell is that supposed to mean?
"...but we're still going to sell them billions of dollars worth of guns, tanks and rockets. Because what could go wrong?"
There is an argument to be made for selling precision-guided weapons to Saudi Arabia instead of having Russia sell them barrel-bombs.
Of course, there is an even better argument to be made to lean on Saudi Arabia not to fight Jemen in the first place.
Yep when they blow up a school bus full of terrorist toddlers they only blow up the school bus.
Probably cut off his own limbs when trying to do up his coat, the zip must have got stuck, could happen to anyone.
Or an accident?
Like when the Archbishop of Canterbury fell backwards on to the spire of Norwich Cathedral, or the one that was killed by a falling gargoyle while swimming of Beachy Head.
Tsar Bomba was a thermonuclear weapon, and an experimental one at that. It's kind of in a different category.That argument is not without merit.
Those weapons were developed to limit ‘collattaral damage’, manufactureres that can’t do the percision-thing, usually compensate with a bigger bang and thus more civilian caualties. Look up Tsar Bomba for a fun example.
Tsar Bomba was a thermonuclear weapon, and an experimental one at that. It's kind of in a different category.
Yeah, but you only need one and the war is over!
I was wondering about that too. Killing innocent people seems to be a regular event.I can't believe that this one slip-up in a sea of misdeeds is what does their international standing in. Public opinion is a weird beast.
Another weird thing: I read that the Saudis mostly stockpile those weapons. They don't dare to arm their military too well. Soldiers even have little or no ammunition, just in case they get ideas.
It does seem like there is a tipping point and that individual point may be quite small in the scale of the issues.I was wondering about that too. Killing innocent people seems to be a regular event.
Tsar Bomba was a thermonuclear weapon, and an experimental one at that. It's kind of in a different category.
It does seem like there is a tipping point and that individual point may be quite small in the scale of the issues.
Elsewhere - maybe in this thread, even, someone mentioned Stalin's quote that a single death is a tragedy, a million are a statistic.
I think that is the case- I can't emotionally comprehend potentially causing a famine affecting 13-million people, but I can get the idea of someone going into an embassy to so that he can get the paperwork to marry his sweetheart and ending up tortured to death. It's a powerful story of the state betraying an individual.
Yes, that's a valid argument, but in our states which call themselves democracies, in which in theory the media plays an important role in informing the citizen so they are capable of making informed decisions, the fact that the slaughter in Yemen has been going on for so long without any "outrage campaign" is very sad and telling. For debatable reasons, it is NOT enough to follow the "serious" media in our countries to make one outraged about the things most worthy of outrage. And knowing that brings responsibility.
Refugees not having access to Europe plays a role sadly. It is a problem in their (ME) back yard.