On this I am in wholehearted agreement, but not in the way you intended. We'll get there:
I'm still laughing. You linked an article about the POTUS, when he was not yet the POTUS. Know why he wasn't the POTUS? Your article was from 2015. You know what else happened in 2015? The red Starbucks cup debacle! You know who was crowing about boycotting Starbucks over it? You guessed it: the future POTUS.
https://www.cnn.com/2015/11/09/politics/donald-trump-starbucks-boycott-christmas/
So you scoff at my example about Starbucks cups, while citing a 2015 article featuring the not-POTUS who called for a ban on the Starbucks cups, during the very year of the Starbucks cup fiasco. I really am enjoying this.
Oh my gawd! You're totally right, Trump hasn't referenced anything like this while
POTUS. Your in such denial your completely lost in the woods now.
Yep, Fox has the highest viewership. But much like President Trump (*leans in conspiratorially*), I don't look to either for accurate information about anything. They do not reflect what I hear in the real world.
The link was not TO Fox News, it was ABOUT Fox News, so you are dismissing an article from another source because Fox is known to lie. That Fox is ginning it up is the point. You're making a fool of yourself, so go on laughing.
How is
We on this forum know it's the Satanists right to an equal display, which you call a dick move.
functionally different from
For the hundredth time, NO. How many times do I have to say that they had the right and I know this and support it? But people can legally be dicks. Shocking, but it's true.
This is why we're going in circles.
Never heard of that group. Are they important or something, or just random internet squawkers? If they are no one of any particular consequence, then so what? Want me to collect the random brain farts of other groups from around the web?
Jesus.
42 million people voted for the POTUS. A ******** of them were evangelicals who wanted to stop the war on Christmas and the persecution of Christians. You can ignore the POTUS and the evangelicals but they don't go away. They are being dicks.
ACLJ are not "random internet squawkers." They take legal action on behalf of poor abused Christians. The article demonstrates how they are being dicks about the Satanic display, offering legal help. Look around, there are other articles that are worse. You can ignore this group and the real world consequences of their legal actions but they don't go away. They are being dicks.
Fox News has viewership of 2,829,000, and as the reference article indicates, they are ginning up the war on Christmas. You can not watch them and ignore their impact on society but that impact is real. They are being dicks.
You go right ahead ignoring the delusional POTUS, lying Fox News, hypocritical evangelicals, the ACLJ, and other similar people and groups so you can join them in calling the Satanists dicks. You're in fine company.