Checkmite
Skepticifimisticalationist
That is also possible, in which case all indications are it's working like a charm.
That's the thing. The name may have been "bad", but that's a subjective opinion and in any case hardly constitutes a remarkable "gaffe", nor is the name itself funny (even to a twelve-year-old). Those calling it a mistake seem to be suggesting that whenever composing a name for something, one has to make sure it won't set off a wave of toilet humor should someone arbitrarily decide to make an acronym out of it. I'm not sure that's as intuitive as people seem to think it is.
Of course now that it's a problem I suppose he should do something about it, either by changing it and firing the person who thought if the name, or by exploiting his opponents' reaction.
Que Monty Python attacking silly British social conventions with their crude and vulgar humor. A shout out to Mad TV, South Park, Family Guy and the Simpsons along with the other shows I mentioned earlier and countless others.That is also possible, in which case all indications are it's working like a charm.
I think exploiting the reaction was the whole point.
Are you sure? Yeah, we've had some fun with it here but I've yet to see any mention of it in the general media. We know that Santorum is aware of the new definition of his name because he's mentioned in person. Thus his staff knows. Thus, as Spindrift notes, since this is a campaign under an intense media microscope, this is a fireable offense by whoever was involved. And Santorum's best strategy is to just ignore it because I cannot see any productive avenues to exploit it.That is also possible, in which case all indications are it's working like a charm.