Merged Russian (genocidal) internal propaganda and goals about Ukraine

[Oystein]

Of course. There has never been any inconsistency in the reporting of events in Ukraine. You can always depend on the corporate media to form your opinions for you.

I think we should all leave it as an exercise to you to hilight and discuss the logical fallacies you committed there. This is really from the early classes of "Skepticism 101".

 

[Oystein]

which has never been able to keep it afloat financially, hence the begging pop-ups on their "News Website Of The Year" - if they tried to put cringe like this;

... behind a pay-wall no one would read it.

Anonymous benefactors have saved them from bankruptcy to the tune of £10's of millions on multiple occasions. You'll have to excuse my cynicism about who they might be and their motivation.

LOL
Too much a coward to admit that media being "corporate" is not your beef after all. You just don't like media that are skeptic of your favorite dictatorships.

Which media is the media you say we should follow?

I notice IsThisTheLife did not dare to answer this, so repeated. IsThisTheLife, which media is the media you say we should follow?

Perhaps we could break it down by kind of ownership:

Owned by a private corporation
Owned by a public or public law entity
Owned by a private individual
Owned by a trust
Not owned at all (like a free of salary cooperatrion of many enthusiasts; think Wiki)

If CNN is no good, how about the BBC? If CNN and the BBC are no good, how about Fox? If CNN, BBC and Fox are no good, how about the Guardian? If CNN, BBC, Fox and the Guardian are no good, how about Wikipedia? If all of these ar enot okay, who IS okay? Russia Today? Pravda? The Russian MoD Twitter channel?

 

[IsThisTheLife]

The Guardian is a disgusting propaganda outlet staffed by some of the most loathsome metropolitans on the planet.

 

[IsThisTheLife]

LOL
Too much a coward to admit that media being "corporate" is not your beef after all. You just don't like media that are skeptic of your favorite dictatorships.




I notice IsThisTheLife did not dare to answer this, so repeated. IsThisTheLife, which media is the media you say we should follow?

Perhaps we could break it down by kind of ownership:

Owned by a private corporation
Owned by a public or public law entity
Owned by a private individual
Owned by a trust
Not owned at all (like a free of salary cooperatrion of many enthusiasts; think Wiki)

If CNN is no good, how about the BBC? If CNN and the BBC are no good, how about Fox? If CNN, BBC and Fox are no good, how about the Guardian? If CNN, BBC, Fox and the Guardian are no good, how about Wikipedia? If all of these ar enot okay, who IS okay? Russia Today? Pravda? The Russian MoD Twitter channel?

Nuts much?

 

[Olmstead]

If CNN is no good, how about the BBC? If CNN and the BBC are no good, how about Fox? If CNN, BBC and Fox are no good, how about the Guardian? If CNN, BBC, Fox and the Guardian are no good, how about Wikipedia? If all of these ar enot okay, who IS okay? Russia Today? Pravda? The Russian MoD Twitter channel?

The blog of the crackhead that works at the local coffee shop. Unfortunately, he lacks the funds to send reporters to Kyiv. Bloody typical.

 

[Dragon]

IsThisTheLife, which media is the media you say we should follow?

 

[Oystein]

Nuts much?

Thanks for run run running away from a really simple question:

Which media is the media you say we should follow?

 

[Jack by the hedge]

The Guardian is a disgusting propaganda outlet staffed by some of the most loathsome metropolitans on the planet.

Metropolitans. Maybe it's a code word for something.

 

[Myriad]

IsThisTheLife, which media is the media you say we should follow?

 

[jimbob]

The actual Nazis were racist, homophobic, probably transphobic (although there were few trans people back then to persecute), and of course, anti-Semitic.

Yet somehow the nation with the Jewish president, with black and gay people volunteering in its armed forces, the one that just enlisted a transgender reporter, - is the Nazi nation.

And the one with increasingly overt antisemitism in its propaganda, the one that cites the presence of black people serving in the Ukr military and the existence of gay/trans pride parades in Ukraine all as justification for the war, is actually the one fighting the Nazis?

If you believe that, I've got a bridge in Crimea to sell to you.

With Kyiv being bombed again, they're also starting up (again) on the rumors of Zelensky fleeing the capital. Astute readers with a memory span greater than that of a goldfish will remember that the pro-Russian idiots ran with that rumor every day for about the first three months of the war. Didn't work then, doesn't work now.

Don't forget the Unicorn Battalion

 

[junkshop]

Metropolitans. Maybe it's a code word for something.

Maybe, but until and unless IisThisTheLife offers an alternative I'm going to stick with the standard definition.

Is that what you meant, IsThisTheLife, or did you mean something else? If so, what?

I don't want to misinterpret your post.

 

[theprestige]

The Guardian is part of the Ecclesiarchy?

 

[junkshop]

The Guardian is part of the Ecclesiarchy?

That is possibly the claim, hence the need for clarification.

 

[Arcade22]

You can always depend on the corporate media to form your opinions for you.

Coming from someone who reposts Chinese state propaganda, this is priceless. Thank god you got such a good trustworthy source to base your opinions on, unlike us mindless sheeple.

 

[Arcade22]

The Guardian is a disgusting propaganda outlet staffed by some of the most loathsome metropolitans on the planet.

It's the Jews isn't it? They are behind it all.

 

[Arcade22]

IsThisTheLife, which media is the media you say we should follow?

The Global Times is apparently a trustworthy enough "media" for IsThisTheLife to consider it important enough to share. For those who are not aware, "The Global Times" is official Chinese state propaganda. They don't even pretend it's anything else.