Childlike Empress
Banned
Does Russia not have any propaganda messages tailored to skeptical audiences with access to western media?
No, she hasn't. Why?
Does Russia not have any propaganda messages tailored to skeptical audiences with access to western media?
No, she hasn't. Why?
Because it seems like a basic principle of communication, when you have a hostile audience, to try to tailor your message to reach that audience. Propaganda by tankies, for tankies, is certainly a waste of time here. Why bother, if you have something better?
But you don't. Even in the propaganda war, the Russians have inadequate weapons, poorly maintained, and incompetently deployed.
No, she hasn't. Why?
Because it seems like a basic principle of communication, when you have a hostile audience, to try to tailor your message to reach that audience. Propaganda by tankies, for tankies, is certainly a waste of time here. Why bother, if you have something better?
But you don't. Even in the propaganda war, the Russians have inadequate weapons, poorly maintained, and incompetently deployed.
You don't understand the situation. Nobody in Russia still believes that propaganda victims in "the West" are reachable. The "Western" propaganda stunts by the usual suspects don't reach the Russian population. They know that the grass isn't greener on the other side.
You don't understand the situation. Nobody in Russia still believes that propaganda victims in "the West" are reachable. The "Western" propaganda stunts by the usual suspects don't reach the Russian population. They know that the grass isn't greener on the other side.

Never mind that Russia has made it illegal to criticize Putin and the war. There very well may be some dishonest reporting from the West. Still, it is miniscule compared to what was SOP in the Soviet Union and now Russia.You don't understand the situation. Nobody in Russia still believes that propaganda victims in "the West" are reachable. The "Western" propaganda stunts by the usual suspects don't reach the Russian population. They know that the grass isn't greener on the other side.
You don't understand the situation. Nobody in Russia still believes that propaganda victims in "the West" are reachable. The "Western" propaganda stunts by the usual suspects don't reach the Russian population. They know that the grass isn't greener on the other side.
You don't understand the situation. Nobody in Russia still believes that propaganda victims in "the West" are reachable. The "Western" propaganda stunts by the usual suspects don't reach the Russian population. They know that the grass isn't greener on the other side.
But you wrote recently something like:
"Did you see the United Nations General Assembly?
Indian Prime Minister Modi proposed Michael H's peace plan."
and then erased your post. What made you change your mind?
Is there any limit to the malleability of "public opinion"?
[qimg]https://i.postimg.cc/RCGyBL3h/Before-and-after-Ukraine.jpg[/qimg]
Is there any limit to the malleability of "public opinion"?
[qimg]https://i.postimg.cc/RCGyBL3h/Before-and-after-Ukraine.jpg[/qimg]
Is there any limit to the malleability of "public opinion"?
[qimg]https://i.postimg.cc/RCGyBL3h/Before-and-after-Ukraine.jpg[/qimg]
There’s no easy way to eradicate the virulent far-right extremism that has been poisoning Ukrainian politics and public life, but without vigorous and immediate efforts to counteract it, it may soon endanger the state itself.
It has recently become clear that Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky loves kleptocracy as much as his predecessor Petro Poroshenko.
Zelensky has consistently protected corrupt officials from prosecution and killed anti-corruption reforms. Now he and his inner circle have destroyed two of Ukraine’s most high-profile graft cases - against Zelensky’s deputy chief of staff Oleg Tatarov and Ukraine’s most corrupt judge Pavlo Vovk.
Is there any limit to the malleability of "public opinion"?
[qimg]https://i.postimg.cc/RCGyBL3h/Before-and-after-Ukraine.jpg[/qimg]
Oh look, you're lying again. How surprising.
As an example, the Guardian quote is from seven years ago, immediately after the ousting of the pro-Russian Yanukovych regime.
Of course. There has never been any inconsistency in the reporting of events in Ukraine. You can always depend on the corporate media to form your opinions for you.
What is my point, would you say?Diversion much?
Anyhow...we can always depend on your consistency in posting random stuff and claiming it validates your point, when the reality is the exact opposite.