• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Ed Rob Menard's FOTL Claims

Status
Not open for further replies.
jargon buster said:
Transport Canada and Westjet certainly governed him without his consent ;)


http://www.avcanada.ca/forums2/viewtopic.php?f=49&t=55543&sid=419443866634e810809d90457aac758b
Click to expand...

Hilarious stuff with Menard doing his usual pathetic posturing.

ComfySlippers said:
The true beauty of the AVCanada pantomime has always been this bit of nonsense:

These imaginary "lawyer friends" and "judges" who all agree with FOTL-Waffle together with Menard's inability to see that his "legal research" amounts to nothing more than him believing a very old and silly scam, make me laugh... a lot.

Endlessly regurgitating the same old rubbish doesn't make it true Rob.
Click to expand...
My favourite was:
Bye now, I am going to see if I can have your Christmas bonus cut in half with my fee schedule. Incidentally, there will be more and more people coming to fly without government issued ID and they too will have fee schedules of $2500 an hour, or $60K a day. Now I know many of you children will scoff at the idea of a fee schedule, but I guarantee your lawyers are not, neither is your management and when just a few people do it, you will see a big difference in your pay checks and profit sharing dividends.
Click to expand...
:D
 
How could anyone reading this thread actually believe that "Freeman Menard" has even a shred of credibility? It truly boggles the mind.
 
From my above screenshots:

Peaceful Inhabitant posted toNicholas Grachanin
Nick, I am back again my friend.
Yesterday at 16:52 · Privacy:

Nicholas Grachanin
Yeah! have not seen you for awhile missed u
Yesterday at 18:22

Peaceful Inhabitant
thanks ...released from jail....87 days!
21 hours ago

Nicholas Grachanin
Well got that out of the way then. Bet you had a good time.
12 hours ago

Peaceful Inhabitant
Not really, now that I do not eat meat or anything that comes from animals. Thus being a so called vegan diet eater, the jail was not set up to feed me, thus I lost about 23lbs, a good thing I suppose, but in a very short time period. It was and is always an experience as everything is at each and every moment.
12 hours ago
Click to expand...
 
Isn't applying for and personally enjoying the benefits of a service such as a student loan while attempting to find and use legal loopholes to avoid being responsible for paying it back pretty much the definition of "bad faith"? Surely the word of such a person can't be trusted.
 
Several posts have been removed to AAH. Stay on topic and avoid making personal attacks.
Replying to this modbox in thread will be off topic  Posted By: Cuddles
 
I'd just like to say that Menard is in no way a charlatan and in fact he's right on the button with everything he sells, sorry says. I just can't think for the life of me why i thought otherwise, after all, all he is doing is selling information that doesn't work to vulnerable people struggling with their battle for truth and justice. His claims may be totally bogus but they are correct. No more must it be said that his claims are a fraud nor is he a fraudster for knowingly selling information he and everyone here knows is rubbish and i recant the suggestions i may have made to this fact even though the evidence points to me being correct, i'm not. It is my understanding that getting money for nothing is a good thing. Perhaps if he claimed he got his knowledge from the spirit world it might be acceptable to label him a con man but since he doesn't and instead has spent 15 000 hours of law study and 14 years in a Library, he's gleaned information learned in his heart,truth.
I can't understand why i thought there was anything inappropriate in selling dvd's telling people they could pay their utility bills by writing 96 is the fix on the bill in red pen, diagonally and sending it back to them. Even though this isn't true, it is.
I now look forward to discussing the claims of freeman rob of the family menard without actually thinking that there is anything fraudulent about the claims he makes and we can deal just with the law and stuff.
Can i then ask, are robs dvd's worth the money? Is the material he presents a truthful interpretation of the law and as such deserves respect?
I can only apologise once again for my misunderstanding of the valuable work he does to help free the common man from the bondage and slavery of the elite.
I'm sure you'll all join me in saying sorry Rob, we got it all wrong and as a man of god can you find it in your heart to accept out apologies. Truly you are a master and i'm a mere grasshopper.
 
FreemanMenard said:
I forgive you. Good to see you coming around.
Click to expand...

Hi rob it's been a long time.
I'm glad you've forgiven me, maybe JB will see the light and realise you're a good man who only accepts payment for the information so you can continue to spread the word and put in them hard study hours gleaming truth from eye that rules us all.
i was thinking of trying the 96 is the fix trick on my next gas bill, would you suggest i try this? I know i'm asking for free information but in this new and positive period of perestroika i'm sure you could wave any charges and offer me up some words of wisdom.
Peace, er
 
FreemanMenard said:
I forgive you. Good to see you coming around.
Click to expand...


Hello again. You probably didn't notice this question when it was posted before:

FreemanMenard said:
Read the enabling clause in the statutes here in Canada. Why do you find the word 'consent' right in it, if consent is not required for them to be deemed as having the force of law? Hmmm?:rolleyes:
Click to expand...

Whose consent does it mention?

Here's a nice short statute where the word "consent" is easy to find: http://laws.justice.gc.ca/eng/acts/C-27.4/page-1.html
 
I'm glad you've forgiven me, maybe JB will see the light and realise you're a good man who only accepts payment for the information so you can continue to spread the word and put in them hard study hours gleaming truth from eye that rules us all.
Click to expand...

Im with you Bob, I think Robs a stand up guy who is just spreading sunshine and laughter wherever he goes.
All the things that have ben said about him in the past are malicious lies.

He should be commended for his sterling work in waking the masses.

what a guy.
 
Mojo said:
Hello again. You probably didn't notice this question when it was posted before:



Whose consent does it mention?

Here's a nice short statute where the word "consent" is easy to find: http://laws.justice.gc.ca/eng/acts/C-27.4/page-1.html
Click to expand...

There are a number of statutes as well where the enabling portion of the statute simply states "An Act respecting..." and no mention of the assent of HMTQor the advice and consent of the Senate and Parliament. The National Defence Act is one.
 
jargon buster said:
Im with you Bob, I think Robs a stand up guy who is just spreading sunshine and laughter wherever he goes.
All the things that have ben said about him in the past are malicious lies.

He should be commended for his sterling work in waking the masses.

what a guy.
Click to expand...

He is tireless in the pursuit of money,sorry the truth and has helped me immensely. Before my awakening i was just another lost soul on the highway to nowhere but now i'm repeating freeman stuff to my friends they've all stopped calling leaving me to feel smug how they're all sheeple and i'm alone,sorry free. I much prefer my internet friends, my 9/11 truther buddies, my anti vaccine and fluoride free chums. You should see the parties we have on skype.
 
seen some of those parties. Not my cup of tea/mug of beer.

I mean, how are you supposed to sneak off with some other guest to bang on all the coats on the bed?

Priorities people! Prioriities!
 
I mean, how are you supposed to sneak off with some other guest to bang on all the coats on the bed?
Click to expand...
that is unlikely to ever happen at a fmotl gathering as personal hygiene isn't top of their priorities.
 
Wow, I just did a Google search to figure out what the "96 fix trick" was. Unbelievable, these nuts think some "magic code" on their power bill will exempt them from paying for the power they used?

From one of their websites:

What they refuse to supply power to my house, are they obliged to do so?
And a separate question, out of interest, is a mortgage a contract or a bill of exchange, (what we are looking into at the moment is down this line of logic as well)
Click to expand...

So not only does he want to force the utility company to give him free electricity, he wants to find a magic way out of paying for the house he bought as well?

They're not just nuts, they're thieves!!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom