Ed Rob Menard's FOTL Claims

[jargon buster]

Poor juleswinfield has felt the curse of jargon buster
He has now been banned from Ickes because they thought he was me

now was it or not, maybe I am ben10 after all

 

[Jake Dale]

this is hilarious, i got banned from icke's and they couldn't even list a reason.

i broke none of their rules and still got the boot.

guess they didn't like having their concepts vapourized.

You have been banned for the following reason:
No reason was specified.

Date the ban will be lifted: Never

you can't play with us.
how come?
well just because

hey all i'm thomas j

 

[Jake Dale]

come on by all icke members.

that is if you can bring all your nanny mods with you.

 

[tsig]

Poor juleswinfield has felt the curse of jargon buster
He has now been banned from Ickes because they thought he was me

now was it or not, maybe I am ben10 after all

Is it true you're really bones?

 

[jargon buster]

I have four other log on's I cant help reverting to type so they normally find me out eventually.
Proxies are great
the fact they keep banning skeptics simply proves they have an agenda and are in Menard's pocket.
when I was posting as Steven1 I broke no rules at all and posted pro freeman.
I simply made all the claims Rob makes and agreed with all the freeman woo, and they still banned me???

They dont have the bottle to come here

Is it true you're really bones?

No of course not, nobody could "act" so stupid.

 

[Stacey Grove]

this is hilarious, i got banned from icke's and they couldn't even list a reason.

i broke none of their rules and still got the boot.

guess they didn't like having their concepts vapourized.

You have been banned for the following reason:
No reason was specified.

Date the ban will be lifted: Never

you can't play with us.
how come?
well just because

hey all i'm thomas j

Well, let's face it, you were giving Menard a whipping. The mods on Ickes run to his beck and call and delete other members' posts at his command. He's their blue eyed boy and protect him no matter what.

It is very telling that they deleted rumpole's post quoted by JB above. It wasn't rude nor insulting and made no reference to Menard's behaviour with the schoolgirl. So why was it pulled? To protect Menard? If not, in which way does rumpole's question have any connection to Menard himself and how did it contravene forum guidelines? Would it be unreasonable to assume that the mods would rather supress information about Menard's past at all cost rather than have him exposed for what he really is? You then have to question why would the mods at Ickes behave in such a manner.

 

[jargon buster]

Would it be unreasonable to assume that the mods would rather supress information about Menard's past at all cost rather than have him exposed for what he really is?

Its clear to anyone reading, what he really is.
Georgy Porgy pudding and pie, kissed the girls and made them cry.

 

[Stacey Grove]

Its clear to anyone reading, what he really is.
Georgy Porgy pudding and pie, kissed the girls and made them cry sick.

I've corrected it for you

 

[jargon buster]

Georgy Porgy pudding and pie, kissed the girls and made them sick. pregnant and then used the child as a reason to con the gullible out of their money and liberty.

I have made an additional amendment

 

[gtm]

Well, let's face it, you were giving Menard a whipping. The mods on Ickes run to his beck and call and delete other members' posts at his command. He's their blue eyed boy and protect him no matter what.

It is very telling that they deleted rumpole's post quoted by JB above. It wasn't rude nor insulting and made no reference to Menard's behaviour with the schoolgirl. So why was it pulled? To protect Menard? If not, in which way does rumpole's question have any connection to Menard himself and how did it contravene forum guidelines? Would it be unreasonable to assume that the mods would rather supress information about Menard's past at all cost rather than have him exposed for what he really is? You then have to question why would the mods at Ickes behave in such a manner.

Yes, Rumpole launched a high explosive torpedo directly at Menards midships & outside help had to be called in. The interesting thing is they must know about the whole squalid 'Elizabeth Anne Elaine' story otherwise the post wouldn't have been removed so quickly. It just shows what a moral vacuum the Icke forum is - they're willing to protect a self confessed child molester because he's 'on message'.

 

[Jake Dale]

Well, let's face it, you were giving Menard a whipping. The mods on Ickes run to his beck and call and delete other members' posts at his command. He's their blue eyed boy and protect him no matter what.

It is very telling that they deleted rumpole's post quoted by JB above. It wasn't rude nor insulting and made no reference to Menard's behaviour with the schoolgirl. So why was it pulled? To protect Menard? If not, in which way does rumpole's question have any connection to Menard himself and how did it contravene forum guidelines? Would it be unreasonable to assume that the mods would rather supress information about Menard's past at all cost rather than have him exposed for what he really is? You then have to question why would the mods at Ickes behave in such a manner.

they're as rotten as he is? just guessing lol

 

[Jake Dale]

..

 

[Jake Dale]

Yes, Rumpole launched a high explosive torpedo directly at Menards midships & outside help had to be called in. The interesting thing is they must know about the whole squalid 'Elizabeth Anne Elaine' story otherwise the post wouldn't have been removed so quickly. It just shows what a moral vacuum the Icke forum is - they're willing to protect a self confessed child molester because he's 'on message'.

when consent makes the law then anything can become law

 

[jargon buster]

In banning Thomas j they have simply validated your argument Jake.

Are the rules of the Icke site law or policy?
If they were law then everyone is bound, even people on this site, if its policy then its just the people on Ickes.
Now, if Menard was right then you could have withdrawn your consent to the policy on Ickes and broken the rules with impunity.
However, they believe you broke the rules they banned you regardless of your standpoint.

So, Menard's withdrawal of consent from societies policy simply falls on deaf ears because if you withdraw your consent and stay within the walls of society it matters not what you say, you will be accountable to the policy.

but you knew that all along didn't you Jake

 

[jargon buster]

I set up another log on earlier on Ickes, they banned it without even giving me a chance to post.
That's great, all new members signing up are likely to get the same treatment.
Good luck with the site guys.

By the way, I have another 3 to go see if you can guess who I am
I will set up another 20 over the next two weeks as well.
If you think protecting pedophiles is honourable then you had better beef up your security,

 

[tsig]

I set up another log on earlier on Ickes, they banned it without even giving me a chance to post.
That's great, all new members signing up are likely to get the same treatment.
Good luck with the site guys.

By the way, I have another 3 to go see if you can guess who I am
I will set up another 20 over the next two weeks as well.
If you think protecting pedophiles is honourable then you had better beef up your security,

They should cut off all new registrations. Never know who might be signing up.

 

[Wisp]

Rob wrote this on Icke's consent thread.

Originally Posted by rob menard
All the men want to be like me.
All the women want to be with me....

(I need my coffee now!)

All I can say is yuck. He would be the last person I would want to be with. Honestly he has to be really full of himself to think that all women want to be with him. I would not even turn my head to look at him an extra time nor would I want to be in the same room with him without a lot of other people around. His looks and his mannerisms are enough to turn off females like myself that actually have taste in men. I just can't see my husband ever wanting to be him either. Sorry but that statement of his is so false and yet I am sure that he is just way to narcissistic to even realize it. Thank god I like men with looks and brains.

Also just knowing what he did to that young girl would have had me turn my back on him very quickly.

 

[Wisp]

I also found something very interesting on the world freeman society site. Seems to me that they have all the same things setup that they are so much against in the real world.
Guess they believe that their system is better. Just wait until they find themselves in much worse situations with their own society.

worldfreemansociety.org/become+a+member

 

[tsig]

I also found something very interesting on the world freeman society site. Seems to me that they have all the same things setup that they are so much against in the real world.
Guess they believe that their system is better. Just wait until they find themselves in much worse situations with their own society.

worldfreemansociety.org/become+a+member

Yes it is odd:

Identification Cards (This will be the proof which rests on them.)

Notary Public- We will have our own Notary Publics to witness the NUI and COR process.)

Education (The Freeman Society of Canada (and their global will provide educational and support services on line and through regular meetings.)

Laissez Passer (Just like a Passport, except for Freemen who are traveling without intent to engage in commerce in the host country.)



http://worldfreemansociety.org/tiki-index.php?page=become a member

 

[Jake Dale]

In banning Thomas j they have simply validated your argument Jake.

Are the rules of the Icke site law or policy?
If they were law then everyone is bound, even people on this site, if its policy then its just the people on Ickes.
Now, if Menard was right then you could have withdrawn your consent to the policy on Ickes and broken the rules with impunity.
However, they believe you broke the rules they banned you regardless of your standpoint.

So, Menard's withdrawal of consent from societies policy simply falls on deaf ears because if you withdraw your consent and stay within the walls of society it matters not what you say, you will be accountable to the policy.

but you knew that all along didn't you Jake

their ideas are so full of holes i don't know where to start sometimes. what's worse is they won't accept their problems and dump them.