Ed Rob Menard's FOTL Claims

Status
Not open for further replies.
Wisp, my thoughts are with you and I hope this gets sorted out in the end. This is typical of the freeman mindset - prey on the easily led and use them.

I too have previously contacted the Canadian authorities. Hopefully someone will bring Menard and his cronies to account at some point because people are suffering on the back of their ego trip. Menard has already been banned from giving legal advice so I wouldn't have thought it difficult to deal with him for what amounts to a breach of an existing court order.
 
From what I can see most of the group has problems with reading comprehension plus a lack of listening skills.
After reading that Rob Menard had fathered a child that was taken away from him then I have to admit that I applaud the Canadian Child Services. I pity any child that grows up with this type of drugged up parent. He should be ashamed of himself. I also read where many of them are very much against women even though they do try to say that they are not. I did find one of the sites stating that the womens shelters where full of lesbians that would try to kill you. They staff were all just lesbians. They would only brainwash women into believing that they were abused. Shame on these people once more. My brother believes the same thing even though I tried to explain to him that his beliefs were nothing but lies.
One of the books that my own brother had that we packed away was called "How to Mentally Dominate". This book was to teach you how to mentally dominate others.
It did not work on my husband and I so guess his reading comprehension did not work to well again.
 
lets see if we can get Menard back on here using his own magic against him :)

As Rob clearly states in his videos a notice is simply a notice and can be countered with another notice, however if it is not countered then it stands as truth.

So here goes..........

This is my notice to Robert Arthur Menard
It is my understanding that Robert Arthur Menard is not a freeman on the land and has no evidence that would confirm the fact that he is.

It is my understanding that Robert Arthur Menard consents to the laws of the land of Canada which includes the statutory body of law which is defined in the Criminal Code

It is my understanding that Robert Arthur Menard deliberately impregnated a drug addled 14 year old child.

It is my understanding that Robert Arthur Menard deliberately encourages others to try out his methods that he knows full well have no basis in law whilst he does not have the courage to try them himself.

It is my understanding that Robert Arthur Menard's consent theory has no merit whatsoever as individual consent is not a requirement for government.
Click to expand...
now the ball is in his court, if Menard chooses to ignore this notice it stands as truth (unrebutted affidavit and all that ;))

14 days should be enough, I know hes a frequent visitor here :D
 
jargon buster said:
lets see if we can get Menard back on here using his own magic against him :)

As Rob clearly states in his videos a notice is simply a notice and can be countered with another notice, however if it is not countered then it stands as truth. So here goes..........


now the ball is in his court, if Menard chooses to ignore this notice it stands as truth (unrebutted affidavit and all that ;))

14 days should be enough, I know hes a frequent visitor here :D
Click to expand...

That sounds like "the last liar wins".
 
jargon buster said:
lets see if we can get Menard back on here using his own magic against him :)

As Rob clearly states in his videos a notice is simply a notice and can be countered with another notice, however if it is not countered then it stands as truth.

So here goes..........


now the ball is in his court, if Menard chooses to ignore this notice it stands as truth (unrebutted affidavit and all that ;))

14 days should be enough, I know hes a frequent visitor here :D
Click to expand...
You haven't performed the ritual correctly. Your notice doesn't have its magic powers until it is blessed by a Wizard of Notary.
 
jargon buster said:
lets see if we can get Menard back on here using his own magic against him :)

As Rob clearly states in his videos a notice is simply a notice and can be countered with another notice, however if it is not countered then it stands as truth.

So here goes..........


now the ball is in his court, if Menard chooses to ignore this notice it stands as truth (unrebutted affidavit and all that ;))

14 days should be enough, I know hes a frequent visitor here :D
Click to expand...

As a Notary of the Country of Cornlandia I hereby set my name and seal on the document and call on all to recognoze it.

Orville S. Redenbocker

My Commission never expires.

SEAL< *>
 
as long as you post it where it will be seen by the individual concerned.
If someone wants to link it to Ickes , please feel free :D
 
jargon buster said:
as long as you post it where it will be seen by the individual concerned.
If someone wants to link it to Ickes , please feel free :D
Click to expand...

No need, JB. We all know he reads this. He cannot resist reading a thread where the subject is himself.
In this post from Ickes he first denies reading this forum, but then strangely admits he does and has a particular interest in one thread.
Now, I wonder which thread that might be:confused:
You get a mention, JB:D
Um actually, I don't read it, and only a few times did people try to help me by showing me what the children were whining about in that little forum.

I have email notification, or at least did. It now goes into my spam box though. And it is specific to one or two threads.

I do read those occasionally for ***** and giggles,and cause I have a bet with someone that I can cause one of those threads to grow past a certain point, so I sometimes keep an eye, and then comment so that JB will do what I wish, and that is keep growing it. He's my lil'bitch.

POST THAT!

Lmao!
Click to expand...

Edited by jhunter1163: 
Edited for rule 10.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I read somewhere that he was in Ontario, Canada at least early this month. I have a feeling that he is still here. He is probably here preying on more people that really need help of the mental kind. plus "guiding" people through there court cases. Those poor souls have no clue that they may end up spending more time in jail than they would have without him. Oh forgot that it is a win to spend time in jail though.
 
Wisp said:
I read somewhere that he was in Ontario, Canada at least early this month. I have a feeling that he is still here. He is probably here preying on more people that really need help of the mental kind. plus "guiding" people through there court cases. Those poor souls have no clue that they may end up spending more time in jail than they would have without him. Oh forgot that it is a win to spend time in jail though.
Click to expand...

I read somewhere he was having difficulty with venue cancellations. He asks for a $20 'donation' to enter these meetings & brings his 'swag' (DVD's, Books etc) to peddle as well Along with the WFS membership 'donation' Ol' Rob must be making a fair bit of money. Perhaps it's time to raise this issue with the Canadian tax man?

PS - Does the name Terry Bouffard ring a bell?
 
PS - Does the name Terry Bouffard ring a bell?
Click to expand...

Yes thats freeman terry :D he followed Robs advice and even made videos with Rob about deregistering his car (all on you tube)

He lost his car of course and ended up around 7 grand down in court costs after bringing a lawsuit (what did he expect, the courts are all corrupt :rolleyes:) against the police.

His reward for his efforts?
He is now a moderator on the World Freeman Society website :cool:
 
jargon buster said:
His reward for his efforts?
He is now a moderator on the World Freeman Society website :cool:
Click to expand...


spad_moderator.jpg



And yes, I am a Moderator/Admin on a BB

Norm
 
Last edited:
jargon buster said:
Yes thats freeman terry :D he followed Robs advice and even made videos with Rob about deregistering his car (all on you tube)

He lost his car of course and ended up around 7 grand down in court costs after bringing a lawsuit (what did he expect, the courts are all corrupt :rolleyes:) against the police.

His reward for his efforts?
He is now a moderator on the World Freeman Society website :cool:
Click to expand...

The freemen have a childlike faith in a system they deem utterly corrupt.
 
This is my notice to Robert Arthur Menard
It is my understanding that Robert Arthur Menard is not a freeman on the land and has no evidence that would confirm the fact that he is.

It is my understanding that Robert Arthur Menard consents to the laws of the land of Canada which includes the statutory body of law which is defined in the Criminal Code

It is my understanding that Robert Arthur Menard deliberately impregnated a drug addled 14 year old child.

It is my understanding that Robert Arthur Menard deliberately encourages others to try out his methods that he knows full well have no basis in law whilst he does not have the courage to try them himself.

It is my understanding that Robert Arthur Menard's consent theory has no merit whatsoever as individual consent is not a requirement for government.
Click to expand...
just a reminder for Rob, 7 days left to rebut this then its fact :D

I have noticed he has virtually stopped posting on Ickes and WFS he realises they all have his number now.
 
Unless he refuses to consent to the use present calendar and consents instead to use of the Hejira - in which it is 1432 - so he now has 579 (lunar) years to the deadline.......
 
It would appear he has responded
http://www.davidicke.com/forum/showpost.php?p=1059612368&postcount=11
A man has a right to face and know his accuser. Will JB be now identifying himself? Or does he due to his cowardice abandon his claim?

For his action to have any validity he has to express how he was harmed. He has not done so. He has no standing.

For action to be lawful it must ask for some form of remedy. His does not.

For an action to be lawful it must be brought before a court of competent jurisdiction. His is not.

His claim is therefore rejected due to his cowardice and failure to identify; for lack of standing; for lack of jurisdiction and for failure to seek remedy. His actions are clearly simplistic, vexatious, frivolous an libelous.

Check mate. Game over. I trust weeman, you will be sure to let him know right? Since you are so interested in giving us updates. And yet you wanted to let it rest FFS. Which is it? Will you let it rest FFS, or will you give us more updates? Oh and so you know, YOU ARE A GIT.

PS- For those that care, all JB says is a lie, that is why he hides his true identity like the coward he is while trying to libel and slander me, all the while claiming he is engaging in light hearted internet fun. His actions also evidence his complete lack of knowledge concerning the law, standing, jurisdiction, and remedy.
Click to expand...
I do however know what slander means.
Im sure I have never been heard speaking ill of Menard :)

I am now a liar which means the child was not his and he now cannot make the claim "the government stole my baby" which he claims was his sole motive for becoming a freeman on the land.

by the way Rob, did you respond to my post with or without your consent?
 
jargon buster said:
It would appear he has responded
http://www.davidicke.com/forum/showpost.php?p=1059612368&postcount=11

I do however know what slander means.
Im sure I have never been heard speaking ill of Menard :)

I am now a liar which means the child was not his and he now cannot make the claim "the government stole my baby" which he claims was his sole motive for becoming a freeman on the land.

by the way Rob, did you respond to my post with or without your consent?
Click to expand...

JB, you are going about this the wrong way!

All you have to do is highlight your notice with the statement called something like "Offer for Remedy Upon Proof of Claim" - respond to Rob's statements saying that you would be happy to consider his rebuttal as satisfactory upon receipt of proof of claim that:

(1) He is Rob of the Menard Family and not ROBERT MENARD, fictional legal strawman.
(2) Upon proper citation to any actual court case that you have to provide anything he is requesting.

Remember - doing good freeman on the land notices is all about making this stuff up as you go along, as its complete legal mythology. According to their woo, he now has to respond with things he cannot (since no court case will ever establish what he thinks they do).
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom