Ed Rob Menard's FOTL Claims

Status
Not open for further replies.
Where he s clever is in pushing it to make cash but keeping out of it himself.
 
BobHaulk;6187078 said:
He's had another new addition, a girl,
http://www.davidicke.com/forum/showthread.php?t=131936

another one no doubt that''ll piggy back on the heard immunity as he seems..........forceful about jabs and vaccinations.

He's even drawn the line at the heel prick test, concerned about the removal of blood, it's a sodding heel prick test not a bleeding transfusion. Claims you can test for those disorders in urine from 6 weeks, don't know if this true.

I guess he won't be claiming the extra child benefit because of his freeman views, the NHS hospital was good enough for them though as was the CHEMICALLY induced labour but not the vit K injection.
Click to expand...
 
I wouldn't worry too much about him claiming child benefits as the child will more than likely end up with social services, hes certainly helping them tick all the right boxes.

JB
 
jargon buster said:
I wouldn't worry too much about him claiming child benefits as the child will more than likely end up with social services, hes certainly helping them tick all the right boxes.

JB
Click to expand...

Then the whole DIcke site can launch into a "State sponsored Child stealing Paedophile " thread and get all orgasmic over the oppression of the down trodden masses by gov't and the BildeIlluminRothsBerg connection.

I digress, I'll get me cloth.
 
I spotted this on Ickes
Menard Wrote
I DO NOT GO TO FORUMS WHICH ARE IN DIRECT OPPOSITION TO MY FUNDAMENTAL BELIEFS! To do so, would be insane would it not?
Click to expand...

Steven 1 then wrote
really?
http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showthread.php?t=155358&page=30
http://www.quatloos.com/Q-Forum/view...php?f=8&t=3019

Why did you go and post on the randi and quatloos forums?
Click to expand...

merlincove the moderator then stepped in immediately and wrote
moved to the rant room as the thread was nothing more than a diatribe of negativity that doesn't belong anywhere else.
Click to expand...

So its now only visible to members so i cant post you a link :rolleyes:
its disgusting the amount of protection he gets on there
may be even a stundie?
 
Last edited:
jargon buster said:
Menard has claimed a big success in Canada for FMOTL
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8EzJsUExEDE&feature=player_embedded

and hes serious, not joking at all
http://www.davidicke.com/forum/showthread.php?t=133024

JB
Click to expand...

This really shows FMOTLers are living in a different reality. You watch that video and what do you see? Some guy making a judge mad, a judge threatening him with contempt, a judge putting the court into a temporary recess (it could have been for any reason). Thats a win...how?

My favorite part is when they recessed and the guy SCREAMED "ON AND FOR THE RECORD THE JUDGE HAS ABANDONED THE SHIP AND I AS A SOVEREIGN CITIZEN DECLARE THE CASE DISMISSED WITH CAUSE..." and other magical legal woo that just made the court staff stare at him like he was nuts.
 
the levels of insanity are gradually increasing.
They are getting more and more desperate in their attempts at flouting the system.

What they fail to grasp is that these videos will generate enough interest to the legal system to make sure all judges and magistrates are ready next time they come in.
So it will go something like this

Is Fred Bloggs here today?
No I am commonly known as Fred
So you are not Fred Bloggs?
No I'm known as Fred.
As Fred Bloggs is not in court we shall proceed without him, remove the man commonly know as Fred from the court.

But of course that will just prove the system is corrupt and will go in the success stories section.

Everyone's a winner
 
Captain_Swoop said:
In the UK they would need an extraction license from the local Water Authority to pump water from the river and they would still have to pay an annual water 'rate'. All fresh water in the UK is the property of the water authorities. Even houses in the remote hills with water fed from streams or springs have to pay water rates (although at a less rate than someone on mains water)
Click to expand...

How can 'fresh water' en situ (or at least in streams / wells etc) belong to somebody?

Claiming ownership of the water table, what a ludicrous concept! I am very shocked at this. Sure, the water company charge for purification and supply to a home as per service provided, great - but to actually claim ownership of all natural water resources!

What a strange world we live in to give rise to such a concept lol
 
1pso fact0 said:
How can 'fresh water' en situ (or at least in streams / wells etc) belong to somebody?

Claiming ownership of the water table, what a ludicrous concept! I am very shocked at this. Sure, the water company charge for purification and supply to a home as per service provided, great - but to actually claim ownership of all natural water resources!

What a strange world we live in to give rise to such a concept lol
Click to expand...

There's somewhere people have to pay the water company to use non-water-company water? In Texas if you are not on a water service, you will have to pay somebody to drill the well and you may have to pay for equipment to take stuff like iron out of the water so it doesn't turn your laundry orange (been there, done that) but you don't have to pay anybody for the water.
 
In the UK you do. Up until the 80s water companies were part of the local Govt, people on a well or spring fed supply paid nothing. When the water industry was 'privatised' by the Conservative Govt everyone had to pay a 'Water Rate' even those with their own well etc. This was done to maximise the return for the newly created water companies, it helped to encourage investors to buy the shares. Same for Sewerage. Even if you aren't connected to the sewer system you pay for it.
 
Latest from Menard.

He openly admits that freemanism fails in court thus making freemen look stupid. He's obviously getting frustrated with the fact that us nasty debunkers use these failures to, as he puts it, "denigrate the whole movement".

http://forum.worldfreemansociety.org/viewtopic.php?p=49042#p49042

His new strategy when asked for proof that freemansim works? This:

I claim no one here may govern me without my consent, and it is evidenced with the reality of them not doing it.

http://www.davidicke.com/forum/showthread.php?t=134726
Click to expand...
Where "no one here" refers to the lunatics at the Icke forum. Some proof.

Of course, the Canadian government continues to govern him without his consent, but that doesn't stop our intrepid freeman! Like when he wasn't allowed to board a domestic flight because he didn't have government-issued id:

http://www.avcanada.ca/forums2/viewtopic.php?f=49&t=55543&sid=2478910145d3d991be8508630edded8f

So much for consent. Foiled by those dirty statutes again. Back to the drawing board, I guess.
 
I don't suppose we could convince any of the mods there to take that as a challenge, could we?
 
That'll be the day.

Mind you, even if he did get modded, he could just say that he consented to the forum rules and thus is actually being governed by consent.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom