Ed Rob Menard's FOTL Claims

Status
Not open for further replies.
How about you point out something from his teachings that you think needs exploring and we'll do our best for you. Since you're a discerning fact seeker, and all.
Flabio? Nothing from Menard worthy of serious discussion?

Ok then.
 
That makes two of us.
But who are you going to follow around with those big doe-eyes without the dreamy Rob?


the self congratulatory circle-jerk you guys have going verges on being unbearable
Well, as long as it's only verging, you can carry on watching through the curtains.


to the discerning fact seeker already.
Oy vey! a yiddisher kop, such chutzpah already.
 
Honestly, I'm not anxious for him to return if he doesn't have anything new to say. As amusing as his posts can be sometimes, it's boring to see him trot out the same debunked points again and again.



I quite agree with the bolded part. It's gotten to the point that talking to him is boring as hell, as he never actually gives a serious response to any of our points, he just re-spews the same nonsense over and over.

It's much more interesting reading other posters' analyses of his nonsense, and the real information that lets us know it's nonsense, as well as doing such analyses for myself. The fun of the hunt, finding just the right site to cite...:D
 
Bwa ha ha ha ha!!!

The Lizard Man, David diversion Icke???

How embarrassing it must be to be you, ComfySlippers. Traffic whoring for such an delusional Christ complex cointelpro tard.

I was diverting you a place where other deluded souls like to gather.

"cointelpro"... really? are you addicted to Alex Jones?
It's no wonder you love Rob so much.

mmmm...that reminds me of someone.

Indeed
 
Last edited:
Hello flabio, do you want to highlight some of Robs theories you agree with?

Oh and have you set up your direct debit of $125 a month yet?
 
Last edited:
Now with the Alex Jesuit Stooge Jones?

Gimmie a break.

"Jesuit Stooge" ?
I fear there is little hope for you. You are too far gone.

hello flabio, do you want to highlight some of Robs theories you agree with?
Don't hold your breath for that one.
Rob's "friend" has already shown his true colours... and inability to process life.
 
Giving you the benefit of the doubt, flabio, is there something specific that you'd like to add to the discussion? You seem to think that we're not giving Rob or freemen a fair shake. Are there really any issues that we've ignored or haven't addressed enough?
 
Giving you the benefit of the doubt, flabio, is there something specific that you'd like to add to the discussion? You seem to think that we're not giving Rob or freemen a fair shake. Are there really any issues that we've ignored or haven't addressed enough?

I'm quite sure "flabio" has read all 168 pages of this thread.

I'm equally sure that he will have noticed that on not one of those pages does Rob provide any evidence that his claims have any validity and are not just his rehash of a very old scam.

Rob presents lies as fact and, in some case, charges money for said lies.

His only defence is "prove you can govern me without my consent".
He quite simply can not answer any question asked of him.

But you will, of course, have noticed that in your fact-seeking excercises flabio.
 
His only defence is "prove you can govern me without my consent".
And when you demonstrate him being governed without his consent he then claims he consents.
An example would be his holiday from this forum, he will claim that as he signed up he agrees to the rules so any ban he cannot withdraw consent to.
So when he does eventually get arrested and locked up for fraud he will claim as he was now moving in the commercial arena and as such it was a governable action he therefore consented to be governed.
 
Actually, he also has "So you think you can have sex with a woman without her consent?" That one always gives me a chuckle.

Which is why, from now on, I shall refer to him and all the other gibbersih-spouting FOTL-Waffle gurus as "The Chuckle Brothers" and to Rob's YouTube channel as "ChuckleVision"
 
I just came to post that Menard is perhaps the worst conman in history. I've never seen anyone be so fully debunked so many times. The fact that he keeps trying replies to lurkers, seems to suggest he still believes he can convince someone, well let me just say, you can't EVERYONE who reads any exchange involving you in this thread, can see how much flaws there are in your logic and how you run and hide when these are pointed out to you. Its been fun watching people destroy your franky stupid theories with ease, but annoying watching you rehash the same old word games, instead of answering questions.

Rob, you are lucky that so many people reply to you in this thread, because it gives you a chance to conviently ignore the direct questions you have no answer for. I'd love to see a 1 on 1 question and answer session with you and someone from this forum, as an example i randomly clicked on page 118 of this thread and saw you running from yet another line of questioning where jb walked onto your land and took an apple. I'd love to see that line of questioning followed through in real time, where you couldnt rush off to take a shower or your dad didnt have a heart attack and you were forced to actually answer the questions with a clear answer, instead of coming back a day later and replying to someone else that "no person can be governed without there consent"

So in short, everyone knows your theories are rubbish, you are convincing no one.
Actually, i propose we all start a fund. We all chip in money and rob can fly to the uk and collect it, providing he travels without his passport, or some challenge along those lines, where rob can collect money for proving clealry that he has special freeman powers. Doubt he would fly all the way to england tho to collect a couple $ when he cant even be bothered to write a letter and cash in his birth certificate bond for 40 million
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom