Right Wing hatefest!

crimresearch said:
But calling Rall an unknown comic strip writer, when he is in fact a leading columnist, or ignoring the Streisands and Garafolos, etc. while focusing on the right wing's dominance in talk radio, is in no wise an objective middle ground viewpoint.

The left has plenty of voices to speak for them, as a review of academia and the entertainment industry shows, and they can employ whatever tactics suit their agenda, just as the right does.

It is apparently in the nature of political parties to produce their own version of the Peter principle, and the hate mongering which rises to the top offends me, regardless of which party it comes from.
Can you clarify please -- are you implying that Streisand and Garafolo are hate-mongers? If yes, can you cite evidence?

And fwiw, I've never heard of Rall either.
 
BPSCG said:
Why? If it's not true, it shouldn't hurt. If it is true, then stop being such snobs. What do you call someone who says that you're not just wrong for having voted for Bush, but that you're also a stupid redneck and an ignorant fundamentalist?


Someone who seems to be the exact liberal cohort of my Republican stepfather, both candidates for the A**hole party.

"Black people in America are so stupid and gullible..." exact quote from my stepfather. Snobbery both ways. I say snobbery rather than racism only because I know the man too well to even entertain that it was a racist statement.

There is snobbery in everyone, to be sure. I do think that great swaths of Republicans look down on those they see as being beneath them morally. I'm saddened to see the great hostility that Americans have toward other Americans, because of their political opinions. I think there is a divide here, and that is more dangerous than the actual opinions of either side.


BTW, on the subject of your original .sig, the suing of fast-food companies being a sign of liberal snobbery. It seems to me we had a President recently who ate at McDonalds every chance he got. Hell, I eat at McDonalds at least once a week. I also shop at Wal-Mart, Costco and Sam's Club.

I don't think liberals as a group have "limitless snobbery." It rings as one of the least true attacks I've ever read, precicely because such accusations don't bounce off liberals. Liberals are CONSTANTLY (tediously) self-evaluating. It's a defining characteristic. It's why we keep losing elections, if you ask most democrats. Hmm... perhaps we need to self-evaluate our tendency to self-evaluate.
 
fishbob said:

AA Party sounds like too much coffee and cigarettes. You gotta come up with a cooler name before I sign up.

I advocate this if only to refute it...



<marquee>NEWSFLASH:How about the League of Nihilistic Solipsism? If you are a genuine solipsist then you believe no one else could consider not joining the League. If you are not a genuine nihilist then you would not deny it. If you are not a genuine solipsist then you do not belong in the League. If you are a genuine nihilist then rejection of any other League is necessary.
</marquee>

The following is a Preamble to the party platform of the League of Nihilistic Solipsism.


1 - As representatives of the League of Nihilistic Solipsism, "we" hang tough in a world of epistemological failure and cosmic purposelessness; a world in which nihilical solipsists, along with other proto-phenomena and apparent p-zombies, are, every now and again, sovereign over existential horror and emotional anguish, and no one is forced to sacrifice his or her repudiation of all imposed values for the benefit of others' nonlinguistic illusions.

2 - "We" observe that the bodies of other human beings behave as my body does in similar circumstances and, so, infer that the mental life and series of mental events which characteristically accompany my bodily behaviour - today, quite possibly, suicide - are also present in the case of others. It is further observed that the banality inherent in any recognition that such behavior is not necessarily meaningful oft subverts critical tools and seems to make inescapable an environment where pointless ideas can be imposed forcibly with little resistance.

3 - Consequently, "we" defend each person's right to engage in any series of astounding improbabilities most likely destined to fail after a lifetime of meaningless suffering. And although within the world "we" picture one does not absolve his or her self of arbiting ultimate moral responsibility, there may very well be times when wandering the streets wearing a sign "I am not drunk. I am crazy. Give me some goddamn money!" will just have to do. It helps to be good looking and well spoken when alienated by a crippling spiritual emptiness.

4 - In the party platform "we" will set forth our basic principles and enumerate various policy stands derived from those principles. These specific policies are not the goal, however. Decades of scientific inquiry and careful research have ended within a perspective of utter futility for life and universal existence and the unavoidable conclusion that there is no point.


[size=1/8]from here[/size]
 
BPSCG said:
So why didn't Rachel Corrie go to North Korea to protest the truly horrifying injustice there, instead of to Israel? She could have gotten killed in NK just as easily.
She didn't go there for the same reason the US isn't invading.
 
More hate from the hatefest:

Prominent right wing political writer for the National Review, and The American Enterprise accuses Jimmy Carter of treason:

Jimmy Carter isn't just misguided or ill-informed. He's on the other side.

http://powerlineblog.com/archives/009423.php





The head of New York's Republican Party linked the Democratic Party to a convicted traitor and terrorist supporter:


the Democrats simply have refused to learn the lessons of the past two election cycles, and now they can be accurately called the party of Barbara Boxer, Lynne Stewart and Howard Dean."

http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&cid=548&e=12&u=/ap/dean_gop_chairman




I rather liked the response of Howard Wolfson who said:


"Don't accuse the 5.5 million Democrats in this state of treason if you hope to win our votes. And, if you make that mistake again, you best be prepared to make it to my face, because we love this country much too much to allow you to ever question our patriotism."
 
Silicon said:
For every Michael Moore or Barbara Striesand, there's 10 Ann Coulters, Michelle Malkins, O'Reilleys and Limbaughs and Hannitys etc....

Silicon said:
Okay, so I see your Rall, a relative unknown comic strip writer. Let's cancel him out with Andrew "Critics of the invasion of Iraq are objectively pro-Saddam" "The left are a third column in the war on Terror" Sullivan.

Okay, Carville. Come up with the worst thing he's ever said, and I'll cancel him out with another bald White House crony G. Gordon "Here's how to shoot the FBI agents" Liddy.

That leaves Senator Byrd? Can I use Strom Thurmond to cancel him out? Dead?!! Darn. Gotta find someone else. Howbout Zell "spitballs" Miller? Hmm... Dixiecrat. Somehow you'll say he's a lefty. Howbout Alan Keyes?

Listen, I still got Michael "Clinton didn't die from his heart attack because Hell was full" Savage for you. And we still haven't found matches for Ann "Democrats aren't Patriots" "Liberal Treason" Coulter, Bill "Al Franken is like Joseph Goebbels" O'Reilly. Jerry "the ACLU is responsible for 9/11"... Fallwell ...

I can keep going. I'm not breaking a sweat. And all of them (well except Sullivan) are household names.

10 for every one. 35 to go...
 
PBS' Nina Totenberg: ""f there is retributive justice [Sen. Jesse Helms] will get AIDS from a transfusion, or one of his grandchildren will get it."

45 to go.
 
USA Today's Julianne Malveaux on Justice Clarence Thomas: "I hope his wife feeds him lots of eggs and butter and he dies early like many black men do, of heart disease."

55 to go.
 
Harry Belafonte: "In the days of slavery, there were those slaves who lived on the plantation and were those slaves that lived in the house. You got the privilege of living in the house if you served the master... exactly the way the master intended to have you serve him.

"Colin Powell's committed to come into the house of the master. When Colin Powell dares to suggest something other than what the master wants to hear, he will be turned back out to pasture."

65 to go.
 
Come on, you're not even 1-1 even with me Luke T.


Come on, just catch up to me, and then we'll quibble if I have or haven't lapped you ten times.
 
Harry Belafonte?

Please. Are we now out of politicos and going after old singers?
 
Luke T. said:
PBS' Nina Totenberg: ""f there is retributive justice [Sen. Jesse Helms] will get AIDS from a transfusion, or one of his grandchildren will get it."

45 to go.


Oh, jeeze, if your going to go back in time for an old attack on a non-sitting Senator, I'll quote Helms right back at you:

No, I do not. And neither do the people in the armed forces. Mr. Clinton better watch out if he comes down here. He'd better have a bodyguard." - Spoken on the 31st anniversary of the Kennedy assassination when asked on CNN if he thought President Clinton was "up to the job" of serving as the commander-in-chief


"All Latins are volatile people. Hence, I was not surprised at the volatile reaction."





He gave as good as he got.
 
Luke T, you're not counting the roughly 50 quotes linked in the first post.

Granted, some are multiple quotes from the same person. But there's a lot of good material there you aren't counting!




Luke, you seem to have missed the point entirely. Keep going back and forth all you want.



You like this stuff? You want more of the same?

Then join the A**hole party.

Those of us sick of this crapola will be in the "Don't be an A**hole party."
 
David Lindorff: "[Bush] is not the orator that Hitler was, but comparisons of the Bush administration's fearmongering tactics to those practiced so successfully and with such terrible results by Hitler and Goebbels . . . are not at all out of line."


Walter Cronkite suggesting the videotape of Osama Bin Laden released just before the election was set up by Karl Rove.

Cameron Diaz saying rape would be legalized if Kerry wasn't elected.

Al Gore calling Republican campaign workers "Brown Shirts."

Columnist Hugh Pearson comparing the Republican Convention to "Nazi rallies held in Germany during the reign of Adolf Hitler."

Linda Rondstadt on the election: "We've got a new bunch of Hitlers."

Bill Moyers prediciton on election night if the election was close: "I think there'd be an effort to mount a coup, quite frankly. . . . The right wing is not going to accept it."

The St. Petersburg, Fla., Democratic Club took out an ad calling for the death of Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld. "Then there's Rumsfeld who said of Iraq, `We have our good days and our bad days'. We should put this S.O.B. up against a wall and say, `This is one of our bad days,' and pull the trigger."

Susan Sarandon: "The United States is a land that has raped every area of the world."

Start lapping.
 
Silicon said:
Luke, you seem to have missed the point entirely. Keep going back and forth all you want.

I didn't miss your point at all. You want to just talk about rightwing a-holes, and give the left a pass.

You say there are A-holes in all parties, but there are ten times as many in the Republican party.

I get it. I totally get it. You are giving a demonstration of how to be one of the A-holes you are complaining about.
 
I want to start the "Don't be an A**Hole Party."

The League of Nihilistic Solipsim will carry all before it! Which, since it is the all and the all is nothing, is a neat trick. It is the Allhole Party to which you refer, so you're toast, pal.
 
Im always kinda stunned by Republicans being shocked that blacks vote heavy democrat. Why would they vote republican? As a voting subset, they really havent been wooed by the GOP.
 
Luke T. said:
Bill Moyers prediciton on election night if the election was close: "I think there'd be an effort to mount a coup, quite frankly. . . . The right wing is not going to accept it."

(cough)exitpolls(cough)

http://nashuaadvocate.blogspot.com/2005/02/invisible-war-as-nation-lolls-into.html

http://www.inthesetimes.com/site/main/article/1970

http://www.uscountvotes.org/ucvAnalysis/US/USCountVotes_Re_Mitofsky-Edison.pdf

Going on the available hard evidence Moyers has not been proven to be either a paranoid alarmist or even wrong. He might be wrong. We don't know. We should know. But we don't.
 
Phrost said:
(Wasted 90 seconds of my life editing **'s into that.)[/B]
There's an autofilter. HA HA HA HA HA HA! **** ****ing **** goddamned **********.
 

Back
Top Bottom