Richard Gage's Explosive Contradictions

[9/11 Chewy Defense]

If Richard Gage had explosive diarrhea, then it's possible for his explosive contradictions.

 

[leftysergeant]

It appears that bill thinks he can just pull 'evidence' out of his nether regions and declare victory. One of these days he's going to actually become aware that what he calls evidence needs to withstand scrutiny to be really evidence.

If he had ever seen a cratering charge go off, he would know he is buying into a line of BS.

He should know, too, just from watching the dust coming out of the Balzac-Vitry demolition zone that the ejecta from the towers did not resemple explosive ejecta in any significant way.

 

[ozeco41]

If he had ever seen a cratering charge go off, he would know he is buying into a line of BS.

He should know, too, just from watching the dust coming out of the Balzac-Vitry demolition zone that the ejecta from the towers did not resemple explosive ejecta in any significant way.

Few if any of our "Truthers" can have ever seen or heard steel cutting charges or det cord - the high (velocity) end of the explosives range.

Nor have they seen slower "lifting" explosives - ANFO etc - the idea that steel cutting charges could somehow throw steel pieces of structural column size is ridicuous and that idea demolishes the inferred linkage to demoliotion that somehow the big column pieces were thrown hundreds of feet by cutting charges.....

 

[sylvan8798]

Few if any of our "Truthers" can have ever seen or heard steel cutting charges or det cord - the high (velocity) end of the explosives range.

Nor have they seen slower "lifting" explosives - ANFO etc - the idea that steel cutting charges could somehow throw steel pieces of structural column size is ridicuous and that idea demolishes the inferred linkage to demoliotion that somehow the big column pieces were thrown hundreds of feet by cutting charges.....

If they were bothered in the least by the contradictions in their theories, they wouldn't be truthers. The best of them can rationalize away this little problem by adding MORE explosives which blew apart the concrete and sent the steel which had been cut by the cutting charges flying at great velocities.

No answer as to why it was only the exterior walls, principally, which "flew" outward, and not things which were well inside the buildings, like desks, filing cabinets, etc.

 

[Edx]

Sorry for bumping this again but check out what some truthers are saying to avoid dealing with such obvious contradictions by Gage.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MusSulcJwSk

eg:

"...And you said "I" quote mined? LOL! I can't believe you reffered me to this, you don't even understand what he's saying. He's using a comparison:
You would not use____ which would give away your project, as opposed to thermate
You act like it's set in stone that explosives have to be loud to be intense, this is simply not true. "
- fakeham

"First of all, there are witnesses who heard explosions prior to and during the "collapse"
.. There could have been a combination of thermite or thermate cutter charges along with explosives, I really can't say for certain, HOWEVER, it is NOT necessary to be able to explain the entire crime in order to know that a CRIME has been committed, any way you look at it, The towers came down in a highly suspicious manner ... can U dig, THE EMPEROR IS NAKED?"
- Charlie666XZ

Wow.

Its funny once you come out of being a truther the fact that you then see how deep the denial goes when they do it to you makes it so much more amazing I think.

 

[angrysoba]

EdX,

On this thread at Pilots for 9/11 Truth, some guy posted what he thinks are the genuine audio tracks of explosions of WTC7.

http://pilotsfor911truth.org/forum/index.php?showtopic=19240

You would have to be a Truther to be convinced by the scienciness of these videos I would think.

 

[Edx]

EdX,

On this thread at Pilots for 9/11 Truth, some guy posted what he thinks are the genuine audio tracks of explosions of WTC7.

http://pilotsfor911truth.org/forum/index.php?showtopic=19240

I would say... funny how ...

1. ... no other cameras picked up anything at all.

2. ... no firefighters mentioned it.

3. ... we dont know where this soundtrack really came from

4. ... it could easily just be wind.

5. ... why cant we hear any twin tower explosions considering it is meant to have had way more explosives in it than a normal demolition in order to fling heavy steel beams around?

You would have to be a Truther to be convinced by the scienciness of these videos I would think.

And they are convinced of course!

 

[Edx]

I would say... funny how ...

1. ... no other cameras picked up anything at all.

2. ... no firefighters mentioned it.

3. ... we dont know where this soundtrack really came from

4. ... it could easily just be wind.

5. ... why cant we hear any twin tower explosions considering it is meant to have had way more explosives in it than a normal demolition in order to fling heavy steel beams around?

Also I love how the videos in your link complains about NISt not using sound for the collapse, when people like Steven Jones will compare WTC7 to real demolitions... but omit the sound. Idiots.