• Security incident: ISF was recently accessed by intruders. Please change your password, and change it anywhere else you used it. Read more

Richard Gage vs Mark Roberts

So Richard Gage has gone full blown Judy Wood.

Are there ANY truthers left who still take this blithering idiot seriously?
 
This caption is called:

The Final Destruction of Richard Gage's Credibility

[qimg]http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/imagehosting/13639486f5dd1c4c81.jpg[/qimg]

Another GREAT moment for the truth movement!
just think, he had months to prepare for the debate and thats his best!

ROFL. :D
 
:Thanks, Caper. Keep in mind that in the NY studio we couldn't see, and largely couldn't hear, Richard's videos or cardboard box demo.:

This explains why when the camera went back to Mark, that he was not laughing. I kept wondering how he could hold a straight face during that portion.
 
Actually, yes. Here's what AE 911 Truth engineer Donald Messerlian believes:

–“Seismographic evidence proved pre-planted explosives destroyed WTC 1, 2 and building 7 before the planes struck buildings 1 & 2.”

Right. The three WTC buildings were destroyed before the planes hit. In the same vein of disturbed fantasy, Richard's aerospace engineer is a "no-planer":

–"After performing some in-depth research on this subject, I have come to the conclusion that no commercial airplanes impacted the two WTC Towers. No commercial plane impacted the Pentagon. No commercial aircraft buried itself in Pennsylvania terra firma."

Can someone please provide a source, a link or the page on ae911 this appears? Thanks!
 
Oh my God, when he dropped those cardboard boxes I just about fell out of my chair. :jaw-droppHe should have drawn a little Keebler elf on the side.
 
I think we finally have a moment that surpasses "Clunkety-clunk" for sheer hilarity. I like this screencap better though, because it captures Gage's mania:

 
I was going to write up a play by play like I did for the Scheuerman Hardfire, but when Mark Roberts said that he could guarantee he knows the oral histories of the first responders and the public better than anyone else in the world, I realized there was no point and it would be a total waste of my time.
 
I was going to write up a play by play like I did for the Scheuerman Hardfire, but when Mark Roberts said that he could guarantee he knows the oral histories of the first responders and the public better than anyone else in the world, I realized there was no point and it would be a total waste of my time.

Did you check out that Dabljuh fellow at the WTC7/ anti-semitism thread? What a scamp. I'd be glad of your comment.
 
The major problem with these shows is that they are so rushed that it's hard to get much in, especially when one side is bouncing all over the place.

I know that you had a hard time hearing him Mark, but when he stated that if a police officer entered a room that had a body and three shell casings in it that he'd do a murder investigation, you should have responded by asking if he'd still do one if there were no bullet wounds and was told that the person had died of a heart attack.
 
Did you check out that Dabljuh fellow at the WTC7/ anti-semitism thread? What a scamp. I'd be glad of your comment.

Link? Not that I have any idea what this has to do with the Hardfire show.
 
The major problem with these shows is that they are so rushed that it's hard to get much in, especially when one side is bouncing all over the place.

I know that you had a hard time hearing him Mark, but when he stated that if a police officer entered a room that had a body and three shell casings in it that he'd do a murder investigation, you should have responded by asking if he'd still do one if there were no bullet wounds and was told that the person had died of a heart attack.

Or if it was a suicide bomber.
 
I was going to write up a play by play like I did for the Scheuerman Hardfire, but when Mark Roberts said that he could guarantee he knows the oral histories of the first responders and the public better than anyone else in the world, I realized there was no point and it would be a total waste of my time.

I'm sure I speak for everyone when I say that your insightful and not at all intellectually dishonest remarks will be sorely missed.
 
The full brunt of that just hit me. You mean this guy actually thinks with the spread of his "serious" cardboard model of the WTC that once he finishes the job he is on he will ever be able to get a normal architectural job again? What is it with the suicidal tendencies of those loons in the truth movement?
 
The full brunt of that just hit me. You mean this guy actually thinks with the spread of his "serious" cardboard model of the WTC that once he finishes the job he is on he will ever be able to get a normal architectural job again? What is it with the suicidal tendencies of those loons in the truth movement?

It really wouldn't be a problem. The other architects that hire him will beat him over the head with a roll of shop drawings; tell him to go talk to the structural engineers and stop acting like architects actually know something about structures. Most architects will admit that they know jack.
 

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom