If it was a mistake...they perfectly timed the planes/explosions/collapses/etc, including all the necessary prep but couldn't manage to time a news release? A shadowy cabal that is all powerful and sinister, except it can't manage the simplest bit of administration.
If it was a leak...why is the reporter still alive? She defied the will of the Grand Poobah and the entire NWO High Council. Shouldn't they sacrifice her to Moloch to appease the Lords of Chaos, or whatever it is they do with drones that displease them? They can take down the WTC, but a lowly newsreader is untouchable?
I like fantasy too, but sheesh. These folks need a reality check.
Of course its actually worse than believeing in an inadvertant leak that WTC 7 had collapsed.
After all why would the supposed perpetrators even issue a statement that WTC 7 had collapsed?
WHEN a building collapses its pretty da*ed obvious. So obvious that I believe that a reporter straight out of Journalism school could have figured out that a building had collapsed and then looked around for someone to tell him what the name of the pile of rubble, that used to be a structure on that location, was called. It would hardly require a news release.
If there was a news release then it was to the effect that WTC 7 was in critical danger of collapse. Gee, what evidence do we have that this was considered likely other than practically the entire contingent of the NYFD that was on scene saying it was the case, and the fact that to prepare for that very propable possibility they set up a wide perimeter around the structure.
This entire line of contention, that the erroneous BBC report means something other than they balls'd-up the information somewhere along the line, is beyond ridiculous and enters into the realm of rampant paranoia.
A probable senario:
1)NYFD person tells a BBC or other news agency reporter that WTC 7 is in imminent danger of collapse,
2) that person passes on this info saying something like, "WTC 7 is going to come down,
3) it gets passed on again with, "WTC 7 is coming down"
(the speaker does not mean this in a present tense but the vagaries of the English language does have this sentence mean either present or future tense. It must be taken in context and if the listener cannot see WTC 7 OR does not know which of the many tall buildings near the site is WTC 7 then it would be easy for that listener to assume present tense. The reporter goes on camera and states that it has come down since after all, by the time the reporter is on camera WTC 7 would be fully collapsed if that reporter had assumed it was on its way down when told of the report)
Do they check? NO, of course not, they want to get info out before anyone else. The CNN reporter, who likely lives in NY reads the report, looks at a monitor and knows that it is incorrect.
end of story................!!
