The thread title is unnecessary. Should not every best friend of a bigfoot hunter expect to be shot in the back?
Alternatively, I suppose we could be parsing it wrong. Perhaps rather than a responsible hunter of Bigfoot the article refers to a hunter who is a responsible bigfoot, in which case any human who thinks he is said bigfoot's best friend should not be surprised when shot in the back. I wager that neither the shooter nor the rifle were reliably photographed; proof irrefutable of their bigfooteriness.
Alternatively, I suppose we could be parsing it wrong. Perhaps rather than a responsible hunter of Bigfoot the article refers to a hunter who is a responsible bigfoot, in which case any human who thinks he is said bigfoot's best friend should not be surprised when shot in the back. I wager that neither the shooter nor the rifle were reliably photographed; proof irrefutable of their bigfooteriness.