"a completely incipient species", and they want to kill it for bragging rights.
At this point I see no problem with hunting bigfoot hunters.
They want to kill it because it appears to be impossible to take anything other than blurry photos of it.
"a completely incipient species", and they want to kill it for bragging rights.
At this point I see no problem with hunting bigfoot hunters.
They want to kill it because it appears to be impossible to take anything other than blurry photos of it.
Dont sit next to it.
Does Bigfoot get 2nd amendment protection?

On the thread title: Can somebody who takes a loaded gun on a search for an at best rare and threathened species be called responsible?
Hans
They want to kill it because it appears to be impossible to take anything other than blurry photos of it.
Oh, and the growing ubiquity of quality video gear has caused the bigfeets to retreat further into the woods, right?
Oh no, they're just naturally blurry.
It's evolution.
I keep waiting for one of these guys to shoot themselves
especially Buck (second from the right). watching him running throughout the woods in the dark with a shotgun is something to see.
Huh. I always thought they just refused to sign consent forms, so the filmmaker had to blur them out.
If I see a bigfoot on a plane....
On the thread title: Can somebody who takes a loaded gun on a search for an at best rare and threathened species be called responsible?
I keep waiting for one of these guys to shoot themselves
especially Buck (second from the right). watching him running throughout the woods in the dark with a shotgun is something to see.
Getting shot while hunting something that doesn't exist is pretty darn special.
If the guy lives can we still nominate these clowns for the Darwin Award?
.Oh no, they're just naturally blurry.
It's evolution.