The problem is that if you want to address what Christians believe, you have to actually address what they believe, as described by them in their own words, not what you think they should believe based on your own reading of scripture.
...why does this conversation seem so familiar?
Maybe I have my moron cap on tonight, maybe I am a moron, and/or maybe I need to sleep for once, because whatever you guys are saying seems like incomprehensible and completely nonsensical Neptunian rambling.
ANTPogo pretty much satisfies the criteria I've outlined. She believes our "rebellion" is deserving of Hell, and I'm going to assume, based on her potentially cheeky silence on the issue, that she believes you suffer as the Bible says you suffer.
Even in the absence of someone who fits the criteria (which I actually expected to be the case, by the way), I'm not entirely sure what the issue is with outlining an aversion to a popular, standard, biblically consistent belief and asking two questions about it that aren't even addressed to those people, anyway:
Do you find it difficult to respect Christians, and why isn't this point discussed more when the topic of religion pops up or a believer has a seizure at us because he thinks we aren't respecting his beliefs?
Ergo, I'm trying to address a popular belief, not locate the Christians who espouse it and interrogate them, nor am I trying to lump them into one category, which is evidenced by the blatant provisions I made in the OP.
Seriously, take me through step-by-step what I'm doing wrong because I have no idea what there is to dispute and I usually would have gotten the picture by now and have refined things suitably.
I guess what I don't understand is why it makes it difficult for you to respect me.
Because that is an utterly deplorable position. Anyone who tells me I deserve to perennially burn deserves
a punch in the face a stern look of disapproval, at the very least. The question that should cause you the most confusion is how I could respect such a disgusting thing.