• Security incident: ISF was recently accessed by intruders. Please change your password, and change it anywhere else you used it. Read more

Republican Legislators Specifically Told Not To Cooperate With Dems

Vague Democrat makes vague claim against opposite party; loyalists stream to internet to express outrage.
That's funny. Your post is #6 and only one post prior to yours supports the OP. That's not a "stream" that's a damp arroyo.
 
That IS funny. :rolleyes:

What's funny is that you took the time to come in here and whine about how there was no source and the OP was vague, but when the source is finally provided you still don't comment about the actual topic.

That seems to be the case for 90% of your posts.
 
What's funny is that you took the time to come in here and whine about how there was no source and the OP was vague, but when the source is finally provided you still don't comment about the actual topic.

That seems to be the case for 90% of your posts.

Not sure if that was supposed to be a joke, but your "source" goes to a show about Wendy Davis of Texas.

By the way, Former Wisconsin Lieutenant Governor Barbara Lawton does not ever appear to have been in the Wisconsin Legislature. I am fully prepared to totally take her word for her desire to "Caucus" with Republican legislators though.

What a farce.
 
Last edited:
Not sure if that was supposed to be a joke, but your "source" goes to a show about Wendy Davis of Texas.

By the way, Former Wisconsin Lieutenant Governor Barbara Lawton does not ever appear to have been in the Wisconsin Legislature. I am fully prepared to totally take her word for her desire to "Caucus" with Republican legislators though.

What a farce.

It helps if you check out the content of the source. But quite frankly I'm surprised you were so easily confused by a single line of text considering your position in the following thread.

http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showthread.php?t=273379
 
It helps if you check out the content of the source. But quite frankly I'm surprised you were so easily confused by a single line of text considering your position in the following thread.

http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showthread.php?t=273379

The link you provided was not working. As such, I conducted my own research. I discovered:

"Former Wisconsin Lieutenant Governor Barbara Lawton does not ever appear to have been in the Wisconsin Legislature."

Ms. Lawton has been spinning this tale since at least 2012, at which she was identified as a member of the state assembly. That was incorrect.

You'll forgive me in advance for ignoring your other comments about my so-called "confusion."
 
The link you provided was not working. As such, I conducted my own research. I discovered:

"Former Wisconsin Lieutenant Governor Barbara Lawton does not ever appear to have been in the Wisconsin Legislature."
This is hilarious. You clearly didn't even try to do what was asked.

First, the interview was with both Wendy and Barbara and the comments in question start about 17:20. The very first thing she says is she was not in the Wisconsin Legislature.

You're ability to follow instructions and do actual research is sad.
 
This is hilarious. You clearly didn't even try to do what was asked.

First, the interview was with both Wendy and Barbara and the comments in question start about 17:20. The very first thing she says is she was not in the Wisconsin Legislature.

You're ability to follow instructions and do actual research is sad.

Uh huh. I've already noted that. Which makes her claim that she was creating a legislative caucus fraudulent.
 
Uh huh. I've already noted that. Which makes her claim that she was creating a legislative caucus fraudulent.
Geez, the guy made a mistake and you call his comment "fraudulent". It's not like he didn't even try to listen to a link before declaring
The link you provided was not working. As such, I conducted my own research.
Now that's fraudulent :rolleyes:

But please stay down in the weeds and avoid the actual content of the thread.
 
Geez, the guy made a mistake and you call his comment "fraudulent". It's not like he didn't even try to listen to a link before declaring Now that's fraudulent :rolleyes:

But please stay down in the weeds and avoid the actual content of the thread.

The actual content of the thread is this fraudulent claim that a non-member of the legislature was attempting to create a caucus in the legislature!

Despite the fact that the media was not working on the link, good basic research enabled me find other versions and I was able to conclude that the op and the lt. Gov's oft repeated fairy tale was bunk.

Good solid research folks.
 
Last edited:

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom