The_Animus
Illuminator
- Joined
- Nov 24, 2006
- Messages
- 3,659
Btw, assuming the source can't be found can we focus instead on whether this is acceptable, unacceptable if it were true?
Back to Obama, Reid, and Pelosi then.Oh, please. The level of bovine fecal matter from the GOP doesn't compare in the slightest.
It's time for the GOP to grow up and start acting like adults.
Reid's ability to Not Allow Vote and so doing makes you beleive he wants to cooperate?It would provide proof that the GOP line about the Democrats not wanting to cooperate is a pile of lies.
It would provide proof that the GOP line about the Democrats not wanting to cooperate is a pile of lies.
Nice to see confirmation bias alive and well.The last five years is proof of that.
Nice to see confirmation bias alive and well.
The truly terrifying thing is that it is likely many of them believe it is for the best for the country. Unfortunately the country they are thinking of is the one they think we had in the 1950's. They are wrong. Very wrong.Typical. For Republicans, its always party before country.
I can understand wanting party cohesion, but not even allowing civil discussion on topics with the other side only leads to a partisan Congress unable to do anything as we've seen.
A pair of opinions remain opinions.That's not really confirmation bias. That's simply reality.
A pair of opinions remain opinions.
You know, if they let the women get together, you get things like resolutions to the budget crisis. You can't let that happen again.
Clearly you've never seen my wife go shopping with her girlfriends.
But seriously, can you cite two or three notable policy successes that were first put forward by gynocentric legislative conferences?
Your claims are kosher, the realistic ones are not. Gotcha.Vague Democrat makes vague claim against opposite party; loyalists stream to internet to express outrage.
...and Repressives will continue to put party before country.In other news, sun to set in West tonight; water, wet.
Typical. For Republicans, its always party before country.
in any case it was a dem woman legislator who brought together 4 other women legislators from each party. It was also those republican legislators who told her that their republican leader forbid them meeting anymore.
Sorry. I tried last night to find it but I listen to probably 2 hours of NPR a day, every day and can't for the life of me remember the name of the legislator. It would most likely have been MPR, or WPR between 4 and 5 central time but I can't be certain it want an archived show being rerun.
I also don't think that there's anything inherently objectionable about the opposition faction doing whatever they can to cast such steps by their opponents in the worst possible light. But I do think we should take suchallegationsaccusationsrumors with a grain of salt.
Sure, my mistake. Unnamed woman from unknown state who is told by unnamed source that unnamed party leader told them not to do something.
Pretty specific? I think you totally undersold it! That **** is crystal clear.
![]()
Your claims are kosher, the realistic ones are not. Gotcha.
...and Repressives will continue to put party before country.