Yes! About ◊◊◊◊◊◊◊ time!"As of February 18, 2027, user-replaceable batteries should be included in all smartphones and tablets sold within the [EU] bloc. The relocation is part of a bigger initiative to lessen electronic waste and prolong the lifetime of consumer devices."
Great initiative, yes?
"As of February 18, 2027, user-replaceable batteries should be included in all smartphones and tablets sold within the [EU] bloc. The relocation is part of a bigger initiative to lessen electronic waste and prolong the lifetime of consumer devices."
Great initiative, yes?
Bigger than which phone? Phones come in a variety of sizes.These phones will be slightly bigger.
Yes, hopefully this will have a knock-on effect to all phones (I'm looking at you, Apple) like the EU USB-C mandate did.Hopefully that's the beginning of a trend.
Let me reword my post. They could design a phone that cannot be taken apart, but if they redesign it so that the battery can be taken out that would increase its size. For example, for battery that can be taken out needs a separate cover. But if it was permanently in the phone that cover is not necessary.Bigger than which phone? Phones come in a variety of sizes.
My phone is fairly old (Samsung s10), and it has started telling me that the battery is not up to par. Which is not true - i don't have to charge it more often, it's rarely below 50%, no matter what. My phone is obviously lying to me. It does exactly what I want it to do, without complaining, but it keeps nagging me about the battery. I would have loved to be able to just change the battery, but i've had a look at youtube tutorials, and while I would do a lot for my phone, I won't do that. I'm really pleased about this new directive, but also pissed that this has not always been the case...
My Samsung S8 is now 8 years old and I've replaced the battery twice, but electronic repair is my line of work so I was willing to have a go. I've also replaced a broken glass back. Stupid design. (I dropped it recently and chipped the front screen. That might be the end of my putting any more money and effort into it.)
I suspect rjh01 is right that making batteries user replaceable is going to make the phones bigger and clumsier than their sealed-shut equivalent. Though I did like the ease of replacing the battery in my previous phones, they weren't waterproof which newer phones are.
If you want a phone that isn't ruined when you fumble it and drop it in the loo, you probably don't want an unsealed phone with a user-replaceable battery.
I actually prefer the current iteration of the smartphone. Regulating them out of existence would mean that I, a customer, could not choose the better product.Yes, indeed.
I've replaced batteries, in a couple of "non replaceable battery" items, and it's a massive pain in the butt, that no one should be expected to go through.
(Or have to pay to have done.)
What we're putting up with at the moment is a glaring example of planned obsolescence, one of the many examples of 'market failure' in capitalism.
(i.e. the consumer cannot choose better products if those products don't exist.)
Samsung had waterproof phones when you could still flick the back off and take the battery out.My Samsung S8 is now 8 years old and I've replaced the battery twice, but electronic repair is my line of work so I was willing to have a go. I've also replaced a broken glass back. Stupid design. (I dropped it recently and chipped the front screen. That might be the end of my putting any more money and effort into it.)
I suspect rjh01 is right that making batteries user replaceable is going to make the phones bigger and clumsier than their sealed-shut equivalent. Though I did like the ease of replacing the battery in my previous phones, they weren't waterproof which newer phones are.
If you want a phone that isn't ruined when you fumble it and drop it in the loo, you probably don't want an unsealed phone with a user-replaceable battery.