...resigning effective immediately due to family emergency.
well that escalated quickly
In this case "Emergency" means "I found out that my wife can read headlines."
...resigning effective immediately due to family emergency.
well that escalated quickly
Someone forcing you to be here?How exciting and entertaining, this really is important news to me. I love hanging out at this new National Enquirer forum. Yay.
Wild guess? A person who is perpetually for sale may find it hard to understand someone who is not.Someone forcing you to be here?
ETA: $5 million? He asked 4 times? How long until he got a clue that the woman really didn't want this?
Okay.
Let us assume Rep. Franks asked a staffer or two to be a surrogate.
Is that bad?
Of course, it depends on how he asked.
Someone forcing you to be here?
LOL, Just be patient, there's only 434 Reps and 98 Senators to go who can/will be outed for sexual improprieties.How exciting and entertaining, this really is important news to me. I love hanging out at this new National Enquirer forum. Yay.
I wonder why the hell he'd offer that amount of money. He already knew all about surrogate birth. He and his wife got twins the surrogate route in 2008, after three attempts at adoption failed because the mother at the last moment decided to keep the baby. As to his views on abortion, they went to a clinic where only a "limited number of embroys were fertilized" because then it's apparently not murdering unborn babies or something.ETA: $5 million? He asked 4 times? How long until he got a clue that the woman really didn't want this?
Franks is rich, so I'd suppose that while most of us would consider five million bucks a pretty fair chunk of change, it would not leave him eating cat food. So fishy? Not so much. Tone deaf for sure - even a fool ought to know to ask only once; and mercenary and creepy yes. More to it? Maybe, but maybe not. An empty hat has nothing in it no matter how hard you look.LOL, Just be patient, there's only 434 Reps and 98 Senators to go who can/will be outed for sexual improprieties.
I wonder why the hell he'd offer that amount of money. He already knew all about surrogate birth. He and his wife got twins the surrogate route in 2008, after three attempts at adoption failed because the mother at the last moment decided to keep the baby. As to his views on abortion, they went to a clinic where only a "limited number of embroys were fertilized" because then it's apparently not murdering unborn babies or something.
But apart from his hypocrisy, there's something deeply fishy about that $5mn offer.
The amount reminds me of the Hastert case. The sex was eew but I was probably just as scandalized by his earnings in such a short tenure as a consultant, lobbyist, whatever he was.I wonder why the hell he'd offer that amount of money. He already knew all about surrogate birth. He and his wife got twins the surrogate route in 2008, after three attempts at adoption failed because the mother at the last moment decided to keep the baby.
I was surprised one night that financial radio guru Dave Ramsey took a call from a woman who wondered if she should go into debt to finance IVF. He's a Christian pastor (though not too obnoxious about it), and I wondered about the issue of leftover zygotes. When I researched this I saw that some bloggers quoted an OT cite that says, "I knew you before I formed you in your mother's womb" as evidence that the Bible would be OK with tossing out embryos since they aren't formed in the womb. IIRC most fertility clinics strongly advised multiple embryos. A few Christians disapproved of throwing away the extras including the head Southern Baptist, but it seemed acceptable to a lot of evangelicals.As to his views on abortion, they went to a clinic where only a "limited number of embroys were fertilized" because then it's apparently not murdering unborn babies or something.
You don't get rich by unnecessarily throwing money out of the window. Franks knew that the $5mn he offered was on the order of 100 times the going price for a surrogate mother. There must be more to it.Franks is rich, so I'd suppose that while most of us would consider five million bucks a pretty fair chunk of change, it would not leave him eating cat food. So fishy? Not so much. Tone deaf for sure - even a fool ought to know to ask only once; and mercenary and creepy yes. More to it? Maybe, but maybe not. An empty hat has nothing in it no matter how hard you look.
Yes, that's a pretty stupid statement. He could have said "we donated the other embryos", thus proudly upholding is pro-life convictions, but as he didn't, he's probably as much a hypocrite as other "christians" of his type.This lady - and I'm sure everyone knows who she is - had to turn him down 4 times? What the hell. Despite his wealth someone should have passed around the hat to buy this guy a clue.
The clinic fertilized only a limited number of eggs? As opposed to what, the infinite number usually used?
That's probably what it amounts to; it's the only thing that makes sense to me in this whole story. And probably not just actual intercourse, but the staffer becoming his mistress.And if he did insist on actual intercourse, more eew.
And probably not the way it's done in "The Handmaid's Tale," either.That's probably what it amounts to; it's the only thing that makes sense to me in this whole story. And probably not just actual intercourse, but the staffer becoming his mistress.