Merged Rep. Giffords Shot In Tucson

MattusMaximus said:
Then I think you're a lousy lawyer, at least you are in how you represent the law outside of a courtroom. You, of all people, especially as someone who represents defendants in murder cases, should be one of the first people to insist that we let the facts of the case, not idle speculation, guide our reasoning and conclusions. You should be leading by example, not following the herd.

Your excuse is like a doctor saying that, while he/she isn't in the clinic, they should refrain from speaking out against medical nonsense. Worse yet, it's like said doctor promoting said medical nonsense, because hey it doesn't matter since they aren't in clinic, right?
Click to expand...
It's more like you insisting that when a doctor isn't in the clinic, they should refrain from giving any medical opinions or advice at all until and unless they have given any petitioners a full barrage of tests. Wouldn't want them to speculate.
 
MattusMaximus said:
applecorped said:
I will still wait for a more authoritative description behind his motives before i ascribe any political motivations to his actions.
Click to expand...

This. Meanwhile, the circus continues :rolleyes:
Click to expand...


Watching the live CNN feed ATM. They just went through this guy's videos and web pages, and it's loaded with I'm-a-terrorist stuff. Then they went to reports they've (presumably) recently recorded, all blabbing about politics and can't-we-all-just-get-along.

Still too much fog, we shall see... Speaking of fog-of-war, they just announced her office is being evacuated at the moment because of a suspicious package.
 
Last edited:
Beerina said:
Watching the live CNN feed ATM. They just went through this guy's videos and web pages, and it's loaded with I'm-a-terrorist stuff. Then they went to reports they've (presumably) recently recorded, all blabbing about politics and can't-we-all-just-get-along.

Still too much fog, we shall see... Speaking of fog-of-war, they just announced her office is being evacuated at the moment because of a suspicious package.
Click to expand...

Yup. But that won't stop people from filling in the gaps with useless information which only serves to reinforce their biases. Who cares about the facts?
 
The facts, don't do it, when you want post it, spew it.
The facts, don't do it, when you want some fun.

(Thank you Frankie goes to Hollywood)
 
People keep saying that the crosshair means that Palin wanted to get these people killed with a gun but the bullseye symbol means nothing, I have made a great discovery relating to this issue:

A glock pistol does not have a reticle or a crosshair, it has iron sights. Thus Palin is not guilty for murder.
 
MattusMaximus said:
Okay, I read it the wrong way then. My apologies.



So what is the best evidence we now have about this incident, counselor? I've asked you this three times now, and you have yet to respond or even link to the facts of this incident presented in this thread.

That's pretty telling, to me.
Click to expand...
What you're doing is in no way adding anything to this thread whatsoever. It's borderline personal attack. In fact, your earlier comments to him WERE a personal attack. I hope he never addresses your shrieking demands, leaving you in a quivering mound crying about how no one will listen to you. Your presentation in this thread should be embarrassing to you later on, once you either sober up or grow up.
 
Dorian Gray said:
Clearly they also used arrows. No guns in their graphic, nope. But no one used an arrow to kill a politician, did they. :rolleyes:
Click to expand...

You should take your Palin-Map-Targeted-Giffords-Led-To-Shooting theories to the Conspiracy Forum.

Though you'll need to provide actual evidence to back up your wild theories...
 
thaiboxerken said:
It's starting to look like this guy is an anarchist. This is pure speculation based on what has come out on the news.
Click to expand...
.
Actually the analysis on MSNBC makes the guy sound like any of the unwrapped folks that post incoherent rambling nonsense here.
Not so much a right wing bagger, just plain crazy.
 
Infoexcavator said:
People keep saying that the crosshair means that Palin wanted to get these people killed with a gun but the bullseye symbol means nothing, I have made a great discovery relating to this issue:

A glock pistol does not have a reticle or a crosshair, it has iron sights. Thus Palin is not guilty for murder.
Click to expand...

no, no, no...Palin was guilty from the first moment's this tragedy began...just read the initial posts in this thread by the Lefty's here.

Pay no attention to the fact that this guy was actually an atheist, pot head Liberal who read the Communist Manifesto...PALIN IS GUILTY!
 
deepatrax said:
You should take your Palin-Map-Targeted-Giffords-Led-To-Shooting theories to the Conspiracy Forum.

Though you'll need to provide actual evidence to back up your wild theories...
Click to expand...

Speaking of "actual evidence", what evidence do you have that anyone has a "Palin-Map-Targeted-Giffords-Led-To-Shooting" theory? Please be specific.
 
MattusMaximus said:
Sorry Rolfe, this thread seems to be long on speculation, but decidedly vacuous of actual factual information.
Click to expand...
I don't recall you adding much in the way of factual information. Step up and be a provider instead of sticking your hand out, huh?
 
According to KOLD News, the sherriff's office has now confirmed 6 dead, not 5. :(

They're also reporting an evacuation of the building where Ms. Giffords' office is located because officers walking around the building saw a "suspicious device". Bomb squad on the way. (My guess on this is that it will likely turn out to be nothing, but just reporting it.)
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom