Merged Rep. Giffords Shot In Tucson

Do we know if the bullet actually entered her brain, or did it just fracture her skull?

The surgeon in the press conference said it entered and exited her skull. If it didn't hit the brain, it surely bruised the hell out of it.
 
Hmm... I must be getting psychic in my old age ...
Naah, no million for you on this - you are simply correct, brain/head needs time to start healing after the double shock of shooting and surgery. Not enough (thankfully) for putting into coma (Gupta covered that nicely!) but still the close equivalent certainly needed.

Good catch, though!!:)
 
surviving a gunshot to the head, at point-blank range..is lucky. in my humble opinion.

yes, I am one of those folks who tries to see the silver lining. The bright side.

:)

Well whatever you do don't utter these sunbeams of optimism to anyone involved. Their own "humble opinion" is unlikely to be the same.
 
With no offense to those who believe differently, I do not care if someone is mentally ill or otherwise troubled If they kill/harm an innocent person. I am sad/sorry for the mentally ill, I sympathise with them and have worked in educational functions with many. BUT like with any other category of person: If they harm/kill innocents all my care and sympathy is with the innocent person. I have none for what did the harm/killing. None at all. I even have to fight reacting when their families/relatives support them over it and do not even begin to understand when the families of the harmed/destroyed say they understand and support the not victim.

I wish execution etc. worked as a deterrant for others, but I know the murderer (etc) who is executed will not ever harm/kill again. By the by, I do have a scale by which I would cover the straight, fast, not expected execution and the other things I advocate. The fictional Lenny would fit it (and I like the ending of that story), but this guy doesn't - he has too much data in him to qualify.


That's all very well and good, and you are more than entitled to your opinion, but it does not address your suggestion that the proper treatment for a sick person who had committed such a crime as a result of mental illness is to torture them.
 
the problem with finding someone innocent by reason of insanity, is that they can be put in a mental hospital for 5 years...and then released if the doctors think he is safe for society.

if the guy truly is "insane", he still needs to be locked up for the rest of his life. in a hospital? sure. but for the rest of his life.
 
The surgeon in the press conference said it entered and exited her skull. If it didn't hit the brain, it surely bruised the hell out of it.
Is this a newer press conference? he one I watched with a surgeon from the hospital said it went through the brain.
 
And what are your psychiatric qualifications?

:rolleyes:

the key word in my post was "if". meaning it was a conditional statement.

"if", means we do not know yet.

"if", means he could be....or he may not be.
 
Last edited:
Again, how is getting shot in the head a "lucky" thing?



Bite me.

Yeah, getting shot in the head isn't lucky. It's just not. If there is a god, he clearly hates her and all the other victims, including the child.
 
Nope, it was in the gutter on page 2 of the thread. By page 4 it hit the sewer. By page 7 it dug through the bottom of the sewer and just kept on going...

... it's so frakkin' nice to see just how far down the rabbit hole goes for some.

Christ on a stick, I think I need to get drunk.

Yep, you do. You also need (no offense) to get around more. A lot of people out there and in here are way concerned about politics as they are done and are concerned about the tendency of the baggers and some regular republickers to be talking literally about gun use if they can't "take back" what they seem to think of as their country. If you have evidence of any but some random communist party holder ons somewhere in the US doing this on the Democratic side of things (I know of none), let me know. Local sheriff and others (others not here) have been agreeing on many of those points.

Sorry it bothers you, but .............
 
Is this a newer press conference? he one I watched with a surgeon from the hospital said it went through the brain.
Only one p.c.( directly after the surgery) and the surgeon did say exactly what you are quoting/noting him as saying.:)
 
With no offense to those who believe differently, I do not care if someone is mentally ill or otherwise troubled If they kill/harm an innocent person. I am sad/sorry for the mentally ill, I sympathise with them and have worked in educational functions with many. BUT like with any other category of person: If they harm/kill innocents all my care and sympathy is with the innocent person. I have none for what did the harm/killing. None at all. I even have to fight reacting when their families/relatives support them over it and do not even begin to understand when the families of the harmed/destroyed say they understand and support the not victim.

I wish execution etc. worked as a deterrant for others, but I know the murderer (etc) who is executed will not ever harm/kill again. By the by, I do have a scale by which I would cover the straight, fast, not expected execution and the other things I advocate. The fictional Lenny would fit it (and I like the ending of that story), but this guy doesn't - he has too much data in him to qualify.
A person in a psychotic state would not likely be influenced by threatened consequences. Their thought processes wouldn't be registering the real world.

How can you blame a person whose brain is as dysfunctional as someone in a psychotic state? We aren't talking about someone who doesn't care about their actions, we are talking about someone who is unaware of reality.

Perhaps you are unfamiliar with this kind of brain malfunction.
 
Democrat crosshairs vid, for those who wanted such...

if someone shot that Congressman 6 days after the video came out, I'd be urging the Congressman's family to file a civil case against the makers of he video.
 

Back
Top Bottom