1) Randi is for all practical purposes people are judged overall, great.
Huh?
1) Randi is for all practical purposes people are judged overall, great.
See the original post, (not "The Great Randi").Huh?
How dare you.I meant grammatically it makes no sense. What were you trying to say?

Many people make money for their services. So?
I also noticed this article was in a newspaper from the Philippines, the home of many of the "psychic surgeons."
The Truth Behind Faith Healing in the Philippines by Jaime T. Licauco, National Book Store Inc., 1980.
Philippine faith healing with its fantastic and controversial bare-handed, painless operation ("psychic surgery") has become a worldwide phenomenon. Psychic surgery is a fact. Although belonging to an order of reality not fully understood nor accepted by present-day science, it is not to say that such a reality does not exist.
This woman sells false hope and lies for a dear price, and it is sickening to me.
While others find it quite acceptable.
read this. you know randi better than i
http://showbizandstyle.inquirer.net/lifestyle/lifestyle/view_article.php?article_id=28286
Many people make money for their services. So?
"Soul evaluations" are never a neat package and a simple protocol.
http://www.nancyorlenweber.com/sessions.html
Session fees: Phone sessions - $110/half hour and $200/hour - Taping session include $5
In Person sessions - $110/half hour and $200/hour - sessions are audio taped in person
It just seems strange that something which is so difficult to quantify scientifically, should be so easy to define monetarily.
This is actually true... they have been conducting these experiments in the Nevada desert for over fifty years now. The studies are large scale, and very well-funded. The experiments have been amazingly successful... for the casino owners.The writer mentions an alleged scientific study of telekenesis in which people attempted to influence the outcome of a dice roll in a game of roulette. How do you suppose that study came out?
The writer mentions an alleged scientific study of telekenesis in which people attempted to influence the outcome of a dice roll in a game of roulette. How do you suppose that study came out?
There was apparently a case in which the English Attorney-General told the House of Lords that "roulette is a game played with cards". The reply from one of the judges was, er, monosyllabic.The writer mentions an alleged scientific study of telekenesis in which people attempted to influence the outcome of a dice roll in a game of roulette. How do you suppose that study came out?
The author also believes in "orbs"... although rather than spirits, he believes they are extraterrestrials. How does he know? Because when he blows up the images, he can see a "very clear image of an ET's face".
http://showbizandstyle.inq7.net/lifestyle/lifestyle/view_article.php?article_id=17696
I don't think there's much the author doesn't believe. It's no wonder he hates people that try to ruin his magical fantasy land.
In the late ’80s, I observed a poor man named Estong materialize coins from his mouth on the streets of Edsa Central in Mandaluyong City. Bus and jeepney drivers would give him, for example, 25-centavo coins. He would put the coin in his empty mouth and when he opened it, a one-peso coin had replaced the 25-centavo coin.
A guy called Chris Morehouse did an experiment comparing three psychic mediums and six students (some studying criminology, iirc) and found that the information of the psychic was no better than the others guessing, but with a lot more reliance on rhetoric.2. Information gained tends to be vague, with no logical chain leading to it
Well obviously the psychic. You see, the investigator relies on boring, real-world logic and reason, while the psychic relies on exciting and sexy magic!Which sounds like the better deal?