Questions Truthers can't answer

It doesn't matter if some of the explosives where the planes hit were destoyed or went off early. If they go off, that destroys them anyway.

Brent Blanchard is not an demolitions expert.

It does matter if the explosives were destroyed because then they (the explosives) would not have exploded in the impact zone (where the collapse initiated).
 
You are guilty of conspiracy if you commit an overt act to further the conspiracy. Writing the conspiracy plan down on paper and giving it to the president is an overt act.


Why do you pretend that a crackpot plan that was laughed out of court rose to the level of a conspiracy? No one believes you.
 
You are guilty of conspiracy if you commit an overt act to further the conspiracy. Writing the conspiracy plan down on paper and giving it to the president is an overt act.

Then you and every troother out there are guilty of furthering the conspiracy.
 
Brent Blanchard is an expert in demolitions. He is not a Demolition Rigger. He is not the person who decides where to place the explosives. He is not the person who plants them...but he is an expert in demolitions.

TAM:)
 
A poll of demolition experts would show a unanimous rejection of the fantasy movement's baseless myths. What do you conspiracy liars know that professionals in their respective fields do not?



I find it funny MSM is scared to death to show it. Idiots indeed
 
The poll results would probably be that WTC7 was taken down by controlled demolition. This in no way makes it true though, and is a weak appeal to popularity.



Popular opinion can cast a bright light on this nasty mess that is 9/11 .And force real honest debate.

The last thing Bush and his hatchet man Cheney want is anybody turning over the rock that will land them on the gallows.
 
I think they pity your stupid movement. Every time they allow one of your mouth pieces to come on a show, the movement gets a big scoopful of embarrassment.

TAM:)
 
Popular opinion can cast a bright light on this nasty mess that is 9/11 .And force real honest debate.

The last thing Bush and his hatchet man Cheney want is anybody turning over the rock that will land them on the gallows.


The TM and honest debate are not on speaking terms.
 
The claim was that Truthers won't answer the question. I answered the question. There was no request for evidence.

I should also inform you, if you've studied your Kurt Godel, that any well- contructed statement that encounteres no contrary facts, is true within the system.

My theory of 9/11 is true at this time.

If you know your Heisenberg, you'll also know that two contradictory statements can both be true at the same time.

And if you've studied your Albert Einstein, then you should know that the truth is relative.


Wow! If you are not twelve years old, you are spectacularly dumb. If you are twelve, you are slow for your age.

No, "Heisenberg" does not pretend that basic laws of logic are not operative, i.e., a thing cannot simultaneously exist and not-exist.

No, "Einstein" did not suggest, to anyone who has graduated from high school, that truth is relative.

Your theory of 9/11 is utter nonsense. It has been thoroughly refuted many times.
 
Popular opinion can cast a bright light on this nasty mess that is 9/11 .And force real honest debate.

The last thing Bush and his hatchet man Cheney want is anybody turning over the rock that will land them on the gallows.

blah blah blah.

And what about when Obama wins the presidency, and he doesn't pay you any attention? Will he be "in on it" as well?

There is no nasty mess, just the distorted, paranoid delusions of a group of whiny, angry young men (and a few women and aged professors thrown in for good measure).

TAM:)
 
Yikes. Why would the evil doers keep any documents?

Not sure if you're being serious, but I'll answer anyway.

First of all, efficient master criminals often keep many incriminating documents. The nazis are a good example.

There are certainly many documents showing the existence and details of the 9/11 wargames that could be found.

There are documents showing the tracking of the hiajckers before 9/11. Many documents refer to other documents, so you can't hide tham all. Also, good people will always have documents or copies of documents, that show what they were doing on 9/11, remember, only a very small number of people planned this operation, and most were just following orders.

There are also documents showing the relationship between the goevernment and the security companies involved in 9/11.
 
The evil doers had know way of knowing if the planes would ever reach their target or for that matter how much damage the plane crashes would do (what if one or both of the planes just clipped the buildings?).

What's the math formula here?

That's correct, FL93 never made it to WTC 7. So they blew it up anyway.
 
There are documents showing the tracking of the hiajckers before 9/11.
Wonder why the truther idiots fail to mention this when they insist that there is no possible way the government had DNA samples. Their story is told by a bunch of self-contradicting lunatics and deranged individuals...
 
Popular opinion can cast a bright light on this nasty mess that is 9/11 .And force real honest debate.

The last thing Bush and his hatchet man Cheney want is anybody turning over the rock that will land them on the gallows.


All of your fellow liars have done very, very badly attempting to negotiate the shoals of the dreaded Osama Conundrum. I predict that you won't even try.

Either Osama's repeated explanations of his role in the attacks of 9/11/01 are genuine or he is being impersonated by an exact double, an asset of the Impossibly Vast Conspiracy. If you acknowledge the reality of his videos, your evil movement collapses. You MUST, therefore, argue against all evidence that the Osama the world sees isn't real.

Now, let's pretend you're correct--you aren't, of course, but we'll pretend.
In the fall of 2006, Bush and Cheney were staring at a massive defeat that would strip them of much of their power and pave the way for a Democratic takeover of the Presidency in 2008. In the face of this looming humiliation, they could have announced that the bogeyman, the nonexistent Osama, had at long last been killed. They could have, in other words, snatched victory from the jaws of defeat.

Curiously, they chose to do nothing and accepted a battering at the polls. Given that neither Bush nor Cheney will ever again run for public office, this was absolutely the last chance to play the Osama card. We all understand how stupid you liars are, but nobody--NOBODY!--will swallow the idea that Bush and Cheney preferred taking a beating that wrecked their second term.

So, how about it, fantasy guy? What is the solution to the Osama Conundrum?
 
Popular opinion can cast a bright light on this nasty mess that is 9/11 .And force real honest debate.

The last thing Bush and his hatchet man Cheney want is anybody turning over the rock that will land them on the gallows.

Can you show me any real honest debate which occurs on the part of the Truth Movement? Take for example the Loose Change forums. JFK fully admits he will ban people in a biased manner. The Prison Planet forums for example, you can have your own post edited by an admin if your opinions are not the same as theirs.

Really, it is an honourable goal but I find it unlikely to happen. We've seen endless debates where evidence is presented for 'our side' of the argument and all the other side tries to do is say "this could be faked, this could be faked, this could be faked" and then expect us to believe in their position when their evidence is essentially speculative news reports and a lack of understanding of Physics.
 

Back
Top Bottom