• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Questions for Lucianarchy

CFLarsen said:

Isn't that kind of a strange reply, if the photo was not Lucianarchy?
Click to expand...

Maybe Luci likes yanking your chain and feeding your assumptions. :D

For instance, "PeeWee? Can I go to the bathroom?"

"I don't know... can you?"

That PeeWee Herman had a great show. Too bad he messed it up by doing things a kid's TV host shouldn't do in the eyes of the public.
 
Lucianarchy said:
Not until you have the deceny to apologise for claiming that it was 'highly likely' that it was me who wrote the anti-Randi crap you dredged up, claiming that the IP addresses are "very similar", without providing one shred of evidence.

Until then, put your tin-foil hat back on and go back to your conspiracies.
Click to expand...

I have given you my answer to that.

If you don't like the idea of something unresolved being referred to, would you similarly want to silence discussions about other unresolved subjects?
 
CFLarsen said:


Some of the numbers. I cannot reveal which ones - yet.
Click to expand...

IP numbers are sold in blocks to ISPs. There are public records available that outline the range of IP numbers in the block each ISP owns.

If you compare the IP number you have with this information you can find out who is providing Internet Services to Luci.

I am surprised you haven't created or taken advantage of applications that will aid in your research.

I am sure you knew all this, with all your experience and such.
 
tamiO said:
Maybe Luci likes yanking your chain and feeding your assumptions. :D
Click to expand...

No, I don't think so. This is not the first time Lucianarchy has come out quite aggressively at first, and then tried to pass it off as a joke. And always when it was something that went juuuust a little too close to home.

If Lucianarchy were feeding my assumptions, he should not right after that try to distance himself from the findings.
 
tamiO said:
IP numbers are sold in blocks to ISPs. There are public records available that outline the range of IP numbers in the block each ISP owns.

If you compare the IP number you have with this information you can find out who is providing Internet Services to Luci.

I am surprised you haven't created or taken advantage of applications that will aid in your research.

I am sure you knew all this, with all your experience and such.
Click to expand...

I am fully aware of what you are saying.
 
CFLarsen said:


No, I don't think so. This is not the first time Lucianarchy has come out quite aggressively at first, and then tried to pass it off as a joke. And always when it was something that went juuuust a little too close to home.

If Lucianarchy were feeding my assumptions, he should not right after that try to distance himself from the findings.
Click to expand...

One question...

Is Lucianarchy worth the extra effort? I sometimes think people waste their time trying to stomp out a nearly burnt out ember while the forest is on fire behind them.

I only mention it because I have been guilty of this myself and have tried to discipline my efforts and distinguish between worthy battles and lost causes that end up making me look worse than my object of focus.
 
tamiO,

What "extra" effort? It's all in a day's work... :D

All paranormal claims are worth the effort. Which do we ignore? It's impossible to tell. I can understand why Lucianarchy's feeble attempts of building a reputation as a psychic, remote viewer or what-has-he may seem silly, but don't forget that any big shot psychic/etc began small. And don't forget that the reputations of Uri Geller, John Edward, James van Praagh, Sylvia Browne, etc. are all built on the accumulated body of anecdotes. It is very hard to go back to John Edward's start in Long Island and investigate his claims then. But we can do it with Lucianarchy, and document every step of the way.

Why do you think Lucianarchy tries so hard to point to him being tested, even going so far as to insinuate that he was tested by the JREF? He wants credibility. And he can't get that, when people can point out that his claims are nothing but a pack of lies.
 
CFLarsen said:


I have given you my answer to that.
Click to expand...

No, you have claimed "very similar IP's". You have cliamed the IP's are over 2000 miles apart. Yet, you have provided no evidence what so ever. You have become the biggest hypocrite ever to walk the boards. The very thing you dispise, you have become.

Karma.
 
I have to admit, and I'm being as impartial as I can here...

...that Claus in no way, shape, or form, has provided any actual evidence.

He's talked about the secrets he's keeping, sure, but where's the evidence?

He can present it in his very next post, or perhaps he is interested in becoming a hypocrite.
 
I try to be as impartial as anyone else here:

a) Why would Lucianarchy refuse to answer CFL questions arguing that he'd be glad to answer in the relevant thread (remember his signature?), but now shots back in this thread?

b) How a particular, non-inclusive speculation such as T'ai Chi's can be impartial?

c) Will I be "badgered" as CFL advocate (or hipocrite or what-have-you), just as the woos cried before?

Beats me... But not really.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom