• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Questions for Lucianarchy

If I have made a claim, I will do my best to answer reasonable, rational questions about it in the thread in which I raised the claim.

That is perfectly reasonable. You have fallen for Larsen's con haven't you?
 
Then how about my question, Luci?

Where is your evidence that my experiment is corrupt?
Is it just the fact that you are unable to cheat at it?
 
T'ai Chi said:
What doesn't help your credibility is claiming something, then running from it, then finally admitting that it was your opinion...

I have not changed my stance one iota.

Lucianarchy said:
Not in so many words, but we all know now that that is what you meant.

"Not in so many words"....Thanks for admitting that I did not say it, but that it is entirely your interpretation of it.

Lucianarchy said:
You have no evidence at all. You have made a claim without providing evidence. You have realised that that is illogical for a skeptic and now want to correct your mistake. That's good.

No, I have not made any mistake. Stop misrepresenting what I say.

Lucianarchy said:
You have said that you are unable to make amends due to the editing restriction. That's OK, we'll get one of the mods to do it for you.

I seriously doubt that. You will not be able to change events, be they ever so embarrassing to you.

Lucianarchy said:
Mods. in this thread, the question which asks about a stupid anti-randi quote and to which Claus says it is "very likely" that it is mine, Claus says he is unable to provide evidence so will you please remove the question.

Thanks.

Let's see if the mods will agree to your outrageous demand.

Lucianarchy said:
If I have made a claim, I will do my best to answer reasonable, rational questions about it in the thread in which I raised the claim.

No, you will not, liar.
 
Lucianarchy,

How are your attempts at having the list removed going? Any word from the moderators yet?
 
What ever happened to T'ai's "analysis" of those transcripts?
 
Ed said:
What ever happened to T'ai's "analysis" of those transcripts?

Ah, yes. The "analysis", where only his friends could participate, those who did not ask uncomfortable questions and make better suggestions.

To participate, he demanded that we either believed that psi was real, or that psi was impossible. We were not allowed to take a skeptical stance, that is to say that we were not allowed to think that psi was possible, yet not proven. He himself claimed to be neutral, though.

We were never allowed to see the transcripts, either.

I predicted that the "analysis" would never surface. I was right.
 

Back
Top Bottom