• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Questions for Lucianarchy

T'ai Chi said:


Don't forget about the IP numbers..

Yes. Come on, Claus. You've had your little bit of fun. Stop trying to divert attention away from the real issues.
budddyh
JREF Kid

Registered: Aug 2001
Location: darkest Philadelphia
Posts: 1052



Here's what I found out so far.
Post in question here:
http://disc.server.com/discussion.c...104&article=220
IP address (view source to see it) 216.112.142.177
Which resolves to concentric.net in California.

All you have to do is tie Lucianarchy to that IP address. I have been unable to do so. So far there is nothing tying Lucianarchy to this post.



Now, please, I have answered your question, now answer mine.

What is "similar" about the IP's?
 
The Mighty Thor said:
So you mean all that 'worked for the Home Office' stuff was actually (probably) lies?

Well, I never!

I think it is obvious by now that Lucianarchy has a long history of perpetual lying. I suppose it becomes part of one's life, if you've been at it for that long.

Lucianarchy said:
Yes. Come on, Claus. You've had your little bit of fun. Stop trying to divert attention away from the real issues.

"Fun"? That's not "fun", Lucianarchy. Neither is it diversion.

Lucianarchy said:
Now, please, I have answered your question, now answer mine.

What is "similar" about the IP's?

I have already answered it.

Here's one of mine:

Looking for psi: WHAT are you actually looking for? How do you define it, how do you discover it, measure it, discern it from other phenomena?

Or, if you like:

How can you determine that Brits are more fearful of 13 than Danes, if you cannot quantify this?

Or, if you like:

Have you tried to replicated the SAIC experiments? If no, why do you insist we do it? If yes, can we see the results, methodology, full data set, etc.?

Or, if you like:

Why is it incomprehensible that Geller can fool Targ?

Or, if you like:

Natalia Lulova: How would you have designed and carried out the test?

Or, if you like:

Do you understand that witness testimony is utterly irrelevant in science?

Or, if you like:

Are character flaws an indication of the validity of a person's findings?

Or, if you like:

Do you think it is possible that parapsychologists could be fooled by a masterful magician?

Or, if you like:

What awards have you won and what pieces were they for and what publications were they in?

Or, if you like:

What kind of evidence will you accept that show you are wrong?
 
My apologies to DudeLuci, of course, if he is NOT Lucianarchy. He might be quite a, well . . ., 'normal' guy:)

But I dislike DJ's anyway. When I was in the Musician's Union the slogan was "Keep Music LIVE":D :D :D
 
Maybe he thought he was the first person to recognise songs by looking at the grooves?
 
The Mighty Thor said:


But I dislike DJ's anyway. When I was in the Musician's Union the slogan was "Keep Music LIVE":D :D :D

Ah, yes, the early 80's. The graveyard years of failed pub-rock, old intransigent hippies, and Ian Curtis wannabees. Lol! Thank Gaia for the digital revolution.

BTW, which part of DJ / mixing in front of thousands of people is not 'live'? :rolleyes:
 
I'd like everybody to come and watch my new live drama production, as I stick on a DVD of "The English Patient"
 
CFLarsen said:


"Fun"? That's not "fun", Lucianarchy. Neither is it diversion.



I have already answered it.


Not even in your deepest dreams. lol!

Claus, how far apart, using the evidence you claim to have, is there between my IP address and the one in California which published the actionable anti-Randi post that you are hilariously trying to pin on me?

Just narrow it down to units of thousand miles if you would for the time being.
 
Lucianarchy said:
Not even in your deepest dreams. lol!

Claus, how far apart, using the evidence you claim to have, is there between my IP address and the one in California which published the actionable anti-Randi post that you are hilariously trying to pin on me?

Just narrow it down to units of thousand miles if you would for the time being.

O........K.

For the time being: 20,000 km. I can't determine if we need to go East or West of California.

Consider this answer "IPso facto psirony".

Now, please answer this question (I'm just picking one, but I'm sure you don't mind):

Why is it incomprehensible that Geller can fool Targ?
 
Lucianarchy said:


Ah, yes, the early 80's. The graveyard years of failed pub-rock, old intransigent hippies, and Ian Curtis wannabees. Lol! Thank Gaia for the digital revolution.

BTW, which part of DJ / mixing in front of thousands of people is not 'live'? :rolleyes:

From what I've seen, usually the DJ himself. Or, "Life, but not as we know it, Jim."

So, you ARE a fan of the old MixMeisters, Luci? Strange, for such an academic and scholar. How many DJ's actually pay their fair share to Performing Rights, do you think?

Note that one, Claus. I thought Lucianarchy might be more of a jazz club fella, like he who is presently absent. Or, maybe an opera buff -- plenty of drama there.;)
 
The Mighty Thor said:
Note that one, Claus. I thought Lucianarchy might be more of a jazz club fella, like he who is presently absent. Or, maybe an opera buff -- plenty of drama there.;)

Disagree. Stealing music for a living fits beautifully with how Lucianarchy markets himself: As a pot-smoking rebellious anarchist with megalomaniac tendencies, who fancies himself having paranormal abilities.

I suppose it is part of the process of growing up: Showing disdain for establishment. If it seems to upset your parents (which can also be personified by science), Lucianarchy will do it. Most people outgrow such behaviour when they reach adulthood, though.
 
CFLarsen said:


O........K.

For the time being: 20,000 km. I can't determine if we need to go East or West of California.

Consider this answer "IPso facto psirony".

Now, please answer this question (I'm just picking one, but I'm sure you don't mind):

Why is it incomprehensible that Geller can fool Targ?

O....K.

Concentric.net is, you estimate, 20,000km or so away from my actual IP address. O....K. What is similar bewteen the concentric.net IP address which was used to for actionable anti-Randi post. and my IP address?

Now, to answer yours. I have never claimed that it was incomprehensible that the good Mr G could fool the eminent Mr Targ.
 
CFLarsen said:

Stealing music for a living fits beautifully with how Lucianarchy markets himself: As a pot-smoking rebellious anarchist with megalomaniac tendencies, who fancies himself having paranormal abilities.

You say that as if that's a bad thing. :confused:
 
CFLarsen said:


Isn't that kind of a strange reply, if the photo was not Lucianarchy? I know, I know...the laughing dog, the evasive posts following that....but why not simply a straight-forward "No, that's not me"?

After all - if it was not Lucianarchy, why not jump at the opportunity to say "No, that's not me - Claus, you fool"?

Makes ya think, eh?

Yeah, you're right there, Claus. It sure does.
 
Lucianarchy said:
Concentric.net is, you estimate, 20,000km or so away from my actual IP address. O....K. What is similar bewteen the concentric.net IP address which was used to for actionable anti-Randi post. and my IP address?

Some of the numbers. I cannot reveal which ones - yet.

Lucianarchy said:
I have never claimed that it was incomprehensible that the good Mr G could fool the eminent Mr Targ.

Another lie: Actually, you have:

Lucianarchy said:
So you admit that even those at the peak of their career or ability can 'cheat', regardless of "power" be it athletic, artistic or mental. The overall evidence in favour of Uri Geller's 'psi' powers being genuine is overwhelming. It would be perfectly understandable for him to sometimes not be able to perform, it would also be understandable for him to sometimes cheat (I believe his ability was strongest during the 70's). Many people forget that those who actually tested him in the labs (as opposed to 'showbiz' appearances) employed the services of magicians, and I believe Russ Targ (SRI/Geller) even had a background as a performing magician before he became a performing physicist.

Didn't Randi mention that in his books or any of his other writings about Uri at the SRI?
Source

Heck, you even claim that Geller cannot fool David Blaine:

Lucianarchy said:
Uri has been tested under the eye of performing stage magicians and illusionists including David Blaine, and others during his time at the SRI. They did not detect trickery. Anyone with half a brain can detect the trickery in the sort of 'psychic' spoon-bending you are talking about. :rolleyes:

If you want to discuss any other issues about the good Mr G, please do so under the appropriate thread and pm me if you want my attention drawn to it.
Source

So, we have conflicting statements from you. Would you like to clarify your position, before we move on?

Incidentally, how did you get the Uri Geller FAQ copyrighted and even trademarked under your pseudonym "Lucianarchy"?

Lucianarchy said:
You say that as if that's a bad thing.

Stealing music is not a bad thing?
 
CFLarsen said:


Some of the numbers. I cannot reveal which ones - yet.



Another lie: Actually, you have:


Source

Heck, you even claim that Geller cannot fool David Blaine:


Source

So, we have conflicting statements from you. Would you like to clarify your position, before we move on?

Incidentally, how did you get the Uri Geller FAQ copyrighted and even trademarked under your pseudonym "Lucianarchy"?



Stealing music is not a bad thing?

"some of the numbers", are "similar", is that what your claim is then? lol! Claus, I'll bet you see faces on the moon and Jesus in a cloud too.

Claus, let me tell you something that will scare the ◊◊◊◊ out of you.

Ready?

Where ever you go, you will always find me (and my lil' alien buddies), plotting with the Dark Forces, smoking pot, mixing music, eating quorn and drinking Cappuccino with three sugars (and cream).

Btw, you claimed "incomprehenisble" in your question. Please don't drag the goal-posts. I have never claimed it was incomprehensible. Although, it is a word which should be applied to your psyche.
 
Lucianarchy said:
"some of the numbers", are "similar", is that what your claim is then? lol! Claus, I'll bet you see faces on the moon and Jesus in a cloud too.

Sure, I do. I recognize them for what they are: Pareidolia.

Lucianarchy said:
Claus, let me tell you something that will scare the ◊◊◊◊ out of you.

.......oooooohhhhhh........

Lucianarchy said:

Yes! Yes!

Lucianarchy said:
Where ever you go, you will always find me (and my lil' alien buddies), plotting with the Dark Forces, smoking pot, mixing music, eating quorn and drinking Cappuccino with three sugars (and cream).

Oh. OK. I had expected somewhat more scary than the equivalent of Teletubbies on Prozac.

Lucianarchy said:
Btw, you claimed "incomprehenisble" in your question. Please don't drag the goal-posts. I have never claimed it was incomprehensible. Although, it is a word which should be applied to your psyche.

That's nice. Do you care to elaborate on your conflicting statements above? They are mutually exclusive.
 
CFLarsen said:


Do you care to elaborate on your conflicting statements above? They are mutually exclusive.

Not until you have the deceny to apologise for claiming that it was 'highly likely' that it was me who wrote the anti-Randi crap you dredged up, claiming that the IP addresses are "very similar", without providing one shred of evidence.

Until then, put your tin-foil hat back on and go back to your conspiracies.
 

Back
Top Bottom