• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Questions for Lucianarchy

budddyh
JREF Kid

Registered: Aug 2001
Location: darkest Philadelphia
Posts: 1052

[...]

Here's what I found out so far.
Post in question here:
http://disc.server.com/discussion.c...104&article=220
IP address (view source to see it) 216.112.142.177
Which resolves to concentric.net in California.

All you have to do is tie Lucianarchy to that IP address. I have been unable to do so. So far there is nothing tying Lucianarchy to this post.




Now, please, I have answered your question, now answer mine.

What is "similar" about the IP's?
 
Lucianarchy has posted to my forum and the only IP address Luci accesses my site with (repeatedly) is not in any way similar to the IP address buddyh has posted.
 
CFLarsen said:


Yes, that picture. Is that you, yes or no?

Whether it is Luci or not does not distract me from the issue.

I am not sure if my logic is correct here, BUT.

If you know it is your Luci, you are disclosing private information.

If you do not know it's your Luci, you are accusing the person who is pictured on the front page of DudeLuci.com - the website that you hijacked the photo from - of everything you accuse Luci of.

I can call the admin contact for DudeLuci.com and get this sorted out.
 
Timble said:
LAs seems to have managed to divert two other threads to discuss their issues, as well as this one...I suspect getting attention is their whole aim.

I hope you don't include this thread in your counting. :D
 
tamiO,

Can I give you a piece of advice? Can you try not to hype your posts so much? You exaggerate wildly.

I did not disclose private information - I asked if it was Lucianarchy. I did not hijack the photo - I simply referred to it.

A call to the admin would not consistute anything. You think you will get any other answer than "No, that's not me"?
 
CFLarsen said:
I did not hijack the photo - I simply referred to it.

A call to the admin would not consistute anything. You think you will get any other answer than "No, that's not me"?

You are correct, you only posted a link to a photo of a man who is or is not Luci.

You are accusing the person who is pictured on the front page of DudeLuci.com of everything you accuse your Luci (known to us as Lucianarchy) of. That person deserves to know that he has been brought under suspicion in a high traffic public forum.

I don't know what the person that answers the phone will say. Neither do you.

I think I can arrange some other things that will help me determine if the person who is the admin contact for that domain name is lying or telling the truth.
 
tamiO said:
You are correct, you only posted a link to a photo of a man who is or is not Luci.

Thank you.

tamiO said:
You are accusing the person who is pictured on the front page of DudeLuci.com of everything you accuse your Luci (known to us as Lucianarchy) of. That person deserves to know that he has been brought under suspicion in a high traffic public forum.

I don't know what the person that answers the phone will say. Neither do you.

You think it will be a "Yes, I'm Lucianarchy"?

tamiO said:
I think I can arrange some other things that will help me determine if the person who is the admin contact for that domain name is lying or telling the truth.

Go ahead.
 
tamiO said:

You are accusing the person who is pictured on the front page of DudeLuci.com of everything you accuse your Luci (known to us as Lucianarchy) of. That person deserves to know that he has been brought under suspicion in a high traffic public forum.

lol, I read these forums occasionally, and I swear, some of you lot lose the plot the longer you are here.
That person deserves to know his image is being linked to typical internet forum bickering! He's now under *suspicion* no less! On a 'high traffic public forum'!!

I accuse him of being Elvis - I await to be sued. Get a grip tamiO.
 
HenDralux said:

I accuse him of being Elvis - I await to be sued. Get a grip tamiO.

No one is sueing anyone. :rolleyes:

I see you have been here around 2 months, so I can understand where you are coming from. I exaggerate the circumstances to put an end to Claus and Luci's endless internet forum bickering.

It's not important to anyone but Claus and Luci.

ps. maybe I am wrong and you have been reading for years :)
 
Cleopatra said:
Is Lucianarchy a musician? That's very cool!!!! :)

I think not, Cleo. A 'MixMeister' by the looks of it.

His 'studio' is a joke. I've seen 12-year-old-budding DJ's with more expensive gear. I guess the keyboard is there to 'make dem funny noises'.

Obviously 'a legend in his own mind' is DudeLuci. IMO he is probably too old to get the chicks he wants, so he is a 'power-poseur'. i.e. he likes to be 'on stage' because he gets puffed out and sweaty dancing with the hot girlies. When chicks point or look at him, he doesn't realise they are laughing at him.

DudeLuci: 'Gee, that blonde must really fancy me by the way she's staring.'

Blonde to pal: 'Gawd, that guy looks like a real psycho, don't you think?'

However, if Claus is saying this is our Lucianarchy, I'm confused more than ever.

Yet, those eyes remind me of someone else's avatar in here. What do you think? Someone who methinks protests too much?

Just speculation, of course.:D
 
The Mighty Thor said:
However, if Claus is saying this is our Lucianarchy, I'm confused more than ever.

I'm not saying that....but judge for yourself:

CFLarsen said:

Lucianarchy said:
Where did you get that from? I demand an answer.

Isn't that kind of a strange reply, if the photo was not Lucianarchy? I know, I know...the laughing dog, the evasive posts following that....but why not simply a straight-forward "No, that's not me"?

After all - if it was not Lucianarchy, why not jump at the opportunity to say "No, that's not me - Claus, you fool"?

Makes ya think, eh?
 
CFLarsen said:


I'm not saying that....but judge for yourself:

Isn't that kind of a strange reply, if the photo was not Lucianarchy? I know, I know...the laughing dog, the evasive posts following that....but why not simply a straight-forward "No, that's not me"?

After all - if it was not Lucianarchy, why not jump at the opportunity to say "No, that's not me - Claus, you fool"?

Makes ya think, eh?

So you mean all that 'worked for the Home Office' stuff was actually (probably) lies?

Well, I never!

Maybe he is a DJ for the CIA. He does mixes to be used as 'psychological irritants' against the Terrorists.

Or, did he DJ a Home Office Christmas bash with the definitive Bing Crosby meets Metallica ultra-mix?
:D
 

Back
Top Bottom