• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Questions for Lucianarchy

OK. You've been nailed.

You are dishonest, Claus.

Dishonest, and completely devoid of integrity and humility
 
Lucianarchy said:
OK. You've been nailed.

You are dishonest, Claus.

Dishonest, and completely devoid of integrity and humility
Click to expand...

Handwaving - or, in your case, wildly waving your arms, while jumping up and down - will get you nowhere.

It would be nice, though, if you could stop being such a lying hypocrite.
 
CFLarsen said:


Handwaving - or, in your case, wildly waving your arms, while jumping up and down - will get you nowhere.

It would be nice, though, if you could stop being such a lying hypocrite.
Click to expand...

Projection and further evasion noted.
 
CFLarsen said:


Handwaving - or, in your case, wildly waving your arms, while jumping up and down - will get you nowhere.
Click to expand...

Browbeating won't get you anywhere either, Claus...but you continue to do it. Don't you ever get tired of it?

Ol' man Flodin,
just keeps on ploddin' along.:rolleyes:
 
Cynical said:
Browbeating won't get you anywhere either, Claus...but you continue to do it. Don't you ever get tired of it?
Click to expand...

We could ask you the same question.

Cynical said:
Ol' man Flodin,
just keeps on ploddin' along.:rolleyes:
Click to expand...

Please get back to us when you:

  • Get a life
  • Grow the hell up
  • Write a second joke
 
I'm no fan of Lucianarchy, but it does seem a bit rich for Claus to chase after him/her/it with a long list of questions he/she/it refuses to answer, but when Luci asks Claus to answer a question - more specifically, to justify an assertion he's made - the only answer is silence.

Come on Claus, you're better than that! At least point us in the direction of the original thread.
 
richardm said:
I'm no fan of Lucianarchy, but it does seem a bit rich for Claus to chase after him/her/it with a long list of questions he/she/it refuses to answer, but when Luci asks Claus to answer a question - more specifically, to justify an assertion he's made - the only answer is silence.

Come on Claus, you're better than that! At least point us in the direction of the original thread.
Click to expand...

It's an old story, and Lucianarchy is perfectly aware that it was discussed before. He is just trying to avoid the hard issues.
 
CFLarsen said:


It's an old story, and Lucianarchy is perfectly aware that it was discussed before. He is just trying to avoid the hard issues.
Click to expand...

Fair enough, but many of the questions you're re-(re)-raising are old ones too...
 
richardm said:
Fair enough, but many of the questions you're re-(re)-raising are old ones too...
Click to expand...

But the reason I re-raise them is because they are not answered.
 
I don't understand how Claus Flodin can have the balls to face Lucianarchy, after that brilliant poem Luci wrote.

Oh, and TLN?.....I don't act any worse than several others around here, so up YOURS, jerk.:mad:
 
While we're on the topic of evidence,

Yeah, it is kind of like Hoyt asking for evidence of claims, yet he flat out refuses (by ignoring) to provide evidence of his claim (see my link below).

Now, why is that?

(before you chime in, Claud, yes, I have asked Jr., but he is still ignoring, so no response).

And Claus, have you found any actual numbers to provide evidence for your claim of Clancie being "obsessed"? I'm not interested in your belief here, just numbers providing evidence.

Claus, do you still claim that you did not take a convenience sample? What is your evidence for this?
 
T'ai Chi said:
And Claus, have you found any actual numbers to provide evidence for your claim of Clancie being "obsessed"? I'm not interested in your belief here, just numbers providing evidence.

Claus, do you still claim that you did not take a convenience sample? What is your evidence for this?
Click to expand...

Please stop hijacking threads.
 
[modu]This thread has been reported for harassment. Nothing in this thread, however, breaks forum rules. If anyone does not care for another poster's writing style, I highly recommend making use of the "Ignore" function. [/modu]
 
Upchurch, you sure are an old busybody, aren't you? Why do you feel the need to be a tattle tale? It's very unattractive, Upchurch.
 
Cynical said:
Upchurch, you sure are an old busybody, aren't you? Why do you feel the need to be a tattle tale? It's very unattractive, Upchurch.
Click to expand...

Thanks for bumping the thread.
 
You're welcome, CF. You should thank Upchurch too, because if it hadn't been for his being a stoolpigeon, I would have been through with it.

So now, Claus Flodin',
you can keep on ploddin' along.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom