Qanon Conspiracy theories

Status
Not open for further replies.
It's not an ad hominem to question the credibility of Barr, who buried the Mueller report along with evidence of Trump's crimes. Barr is a pathetic, partisan hack, and perhaps one day he'll end up in the dock as well. Who knows? It's a long game.

Excellent !

You know, in a vision I saw you become one of our future Pep Talk Leaders!!!
How's your swagger ?


Still, you guys need to get going on Hillary before she dies of old age.


Could you please take that on for me? I'm pretty busy these days, what with bringing Beachnut, Resume, and abaddon up to speed.
 
Last edited:
Oh Bubba, you brighten my days, you really do.
I linked to the Wiki article on John Solomon. Its list of sources at the end include at least 4 from thehill.
You describe these sources as:

[an] unreliable source known for crap, run and edited by deep state alien sex maniacs, exhibitionists, perverts and three eyed liars:

Then you do this:


:dl:

Comedy gold. Keep it coming, Bubba!
 
Pretending does not already know that my references to "MSM" usually does not include Fox,

Bubba, you are the gift that keeps on giving.
Having just defended Fox News. you then post this


showing Fox News as part of the Evil Conspiracy.
:dl::dl::dl:

Brilliant! Do you have a scriptwriter, or is this all your own material?
 
Perhaps Bubba is a deep state agent out to discredit the critical and dangerous information coming out of Q and Fox news about them?

...or something
 
Dr. Stephen Smith, an infectious disease specialist, on using hydroxychloroquine/azithromycin combo to treat #COVID19 patients:

https://twitter.com/LotusOak2/status/1251043604728029184

Got anything from this supposed doctor? No, of course not.

Following that stupid link trail leads always back to Fox.

Why do you believe everything Fox says is true? Because you are apparently so gullible that you will believe any old thing that Fox puts out on the airwaves.

In other words, you are not "woke". You are one of those you rail against, believing a single source that you cannot verify.


All you are doing is making claims like this...

Life preserving pixies formed the entire universe. Prove me wrong.

The claims are equivalent.
 
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/2020/04/15/coronavirus-chloroquine-test-halted-drug/2983129001/
Study of Trump-touted chloroquine for coronavirus stopped due to heart problems, deaths
https://www.scientificamerican.com/...t-the-most-touted-drugs-tested-for-covid-191/

“None of these therapies are proven,” says Stanley Perlman, a professor of microbiology and immunology at the University of Iowa. Only the results of randomized clinical trials can show whether they work, he adds.

https://www.bbc.com/news/51980731

There is insufficient evidence at the moment from current trials as to their effective use in treatment of patients with Covid-19.

There are also risks of serious side effects, including renal and liver damage.

"We need larger, high-quality randomised clinical trials in order to better evaluate their effectiveness," says University of Oxford's Kome Gbinigie, author of a report on anti-malarial testing for Covid-19.

https://techcrunch.com/2020/03/25/n...quines-effectiveness-in-treating-coronavirus/

New study casts doubt on hyrdoxychloroquine’s effectiveness in treating coronavirus

https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/could-chloroquine-treat-coronavirus/

An Arizona man died, and his wife was hospitalized, after taking a form of chloroquine, which President Trump has touted as an effective treatment for COVID-19. The couple decided to self-medicate with chloroquine phosphate, which they had on hand to kill parasites in their fish, after hearing the president describe the drug as a “game changer.”

Dr. Anthony Fauci, head of NIH’s National Institute for Allergies and Infectious Diseases, quickly corrected the statement, explaining that Trump’s comments were based on anecdotes and not a controlled clinical trial . . .

SHOULD I START TAKING THEM TO WARD OFF CORONAVIRUS?
Absolutely not. Chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine have not been appropriately evaluated in controlled studies, not to mention that they have numerous and, in some cases, very deadly side effects.

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/arti...no-better-than-regular-covid-19-care-in-study

Malaria Drug Chloroquine No Better Than Regular Coronavirus Care, Study Finds
 
Got anything from this supposed doctor? No, of course not.

Following that stupid link trail leads always back to Fox.

Why do you believe everything Fox says is true? Because you are apparently so gullible that you will believe any old thing that Fox puts out on the airwaves.

In other words, you are not "woke". You are one of those you rail against, believing a single source that you cannot verify.

Not forgetting that Bubba has already posted a graphic showing how Fox News is part of the Evil Conspiracy. I think Hans is right: he must be a shill.
 
https://www.reuters.com/article/uk-...atients-washalted-after11deaths-idUSKBN21Z395

Articles being shared on social media make the claim that a study to test the effectiveness of drug chloroquine on coronavirus patients in Brazil was halted after participants developed irregular heart rates and 11 died.

The articles have been flagged multiple times as part of Facebook’s efforts to curb misinformation related to the new coronavirus.

The article and its central claim are true. The findings of the Brazilian team are published online and the 11 deaths (out of 81 participants) are shown in table 3 on page 28. The study was indeed halted after deaths were recorded.
 
Lupus patients have been using it regularly for years.
- Rheumatologists
Yes, where indicated and when it can be administered safely. Not willy-nilly the way some idiots are advocating.

- Medical Science.
 
Last edited:
Yes, where indicated and when it can be administered safely.
- Medical Science.


Duh.



Rheumatologists also said their long time lupus patients using it regularly do not contract ed cv 19.

The problem with Hyd-chloroqne it is that vaccines are where the money is.

Duh.
 
Rheumatologists also said their long time lupus patients using it regularly do not contract ed cv 19
Medical science indicates no such thing. Quit spreading anecdotal bull ****.

https://www.goodrx.com/blog/coronav...uine-hydroxychloroquine-as-covid19-treatment/

Hydroxychloroquine and chloroquine are two medications that have been used for many decades to treat malaria and autoimmune conditions like rheumatoid arthritis and lupus.

There is not enough medical data at this time to prove that hydroxychloroquine and chloroquine work for COVID-19 — while some small studies suggest the medications may be helpful, other studies saw no difference.

There have been no studies showing that these medications work for prevention.
There’s now a shortage of hydroxychloroquine and chloroquine, which means that people who normally take these medications to manage their health are having a harder time getting the treatment they need
 
Last edited:
Not willy-nilly the way some idiots are advocating.

Why even mention them.


South Dakota will or did start not so willy-nilly testing of hydrxchlqine.

- Dz. On Fox. On Hannity.



Lucky for us sharpshootin 'skeptics' we can sneer and dsimiss any mention of a real study in S Dakota because



- Dz. On Fox. On Hannity
 
Why even mention them.

So don't.

Doctor OZ isn't a medical researcher nor is he an epidemiologist. He is a TV doctor that advocates psuedoscience and woo and has been publicly humiliated for it. No wonder Fox had him on.
 
Last edited:
Looks like S Dakota started trials around 5 days ago.

Naturally, the reporting on it appears skewed, as could be predicted.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom