Qanon Conspiracy theories

Status
Not open for further replies.
The thread search tool doesn't let you search for things inside html tags, so I can't be sure. Maybe it hasn't been as prevalent as I remember. But "hey this website has new things all the time" isn't a reason to repeatedly link it. So do almost all websites.
 
Why do you feel that way, Carlitos ? I hope I haven't offended you, and I am sorry if I did so without realizing it.

Did you not know the content at that link is changing daily? Therefore to me it seems not like spam. There have been anywhere from 3 to 9 new posts there each day lately.

All the new items there offer tons of insights on what went on at FBI, DOj, etc, from the unique perspective of Q, of course, and what is going on currently behind the scenes.

Anyway, I was hoping we could have a more amicable relationship. Could you please reconsider?

When's Julian Assange coming to America to testify?
 
The thread search tool doesn't let you search for things inside html tags, so I can't be sure. Maybe it hasn't been as prevalent as I remember. But "hey this website has new things all the time" isn't a reason to repeatedly link it. So do almost all websites.




1) your first link is double-wrapped in tags.

2) what does this 8 second blurb from Hannity even mean?


Delphic Oracle had no problem finding it.

It was this,
(and it was the same at Qmap at the time):

https://twitter.com/333RDREVOLUTION/status/1105640734785445889


....and now its looking like Hannity knew of what he spake


https://twitter.com/filthy_liberals/status/1106369915265658880


if so, thing are 'heating up' in accordance with what Q said was going to happen, months ago. Maybe, maybe not. Time will tell. Q certainly has been prolific and specific lately. More than usual.

What did Obama know and when did he know it ?
 
Delphic Oracle had no problem finding it.

It was this,
(and it was the same at Qmap at the time):

https://twitter.com/333RDREVOLUTION/status/1105640734785445889


....and now its looking like Hannity knew of what he spake


https://twitter.com/filthy_liberals/status/1106369915265658880


if so, thing are 'heating up' in accordance with what Q said was going to happen, months ago. Maybe, maybe not. Time will tell. Q certainly has been prolific and specific lately. More than usual.

What did Obama know and when did he know it ?

Enough with this fiddle-faddle!! Beef or Pork? Q-sauce or no Q-sauce? These ARE the things we want to know!!!
 
. . . if so, thing are 'heating up' in accordance with what Q said was going to happen, months ago. Maybe, maybe not. Time will tell. Q certainly has been prolific and specific lately. More than usual.
Sure, any day, week, month, year, decade, century, millenium, eon now. Keep waiting, credules.

What did Obama know and when did he know it ?
He knows a lot of stuff. As compared to Quidiots.
 
Last edited:
Can you describe what the link contains? Hopefully something relevant.


Lately hearings and testimonies. Page Strzok, Mueller, Barr, Zuckerberg, etc, follow the $, uranium,

But thats just a tiny drip from the bucketful of 3K+ drops dripping since 28 Oct 2017.


To me, a perhaps better answer to your question is 'the players page'

It has all the players' names, pics, captions, designated as traitor or patriot or unknown or neutral or pawn or flipped/freed or evil etc.


Enough with this fiddle-faddle!! Beef or Pork? Q-sauce or no Q-sauce? These ARE the things we want to know!!!


The beauty of 'players' is that it can be tasty fodder no matter what your taste. This likely will be apparent forthwith.

No matter what you think of Q, 'players' at least provides a 'who's who, of those mentioned by Q. Each player has a button linking to Q posts mentioning that player.

Was this helpful?
 
Last edited:
Delphic Oracle had no problem finding it.

It was this,
(and it was the same at Qmap at the time):

https://twitter.com/333RDREVOLUTION/status/1105640734785445889


....and now its looking like Hannity knew of what he spake


https://twitter.com/filthy_liberals/status/1106369915265658880


if so, thing are 'heating up' in accordance with what Q said was going to happen, months ago. Maybe, maybe not. Time will tell. Q certainly has been prolific and specific lately. More than usual.

What did Obama know and when did he know it ?

1. Nobody knows what Mueller is going to say in his final report. NOBODY.

2. Low I-Q left out the part of the Steele Document wherein is mentioned that the owner of the Florida massage parlor targeted in a DoJ human trafficking raid was selling access to Mar Lago: https://www.motherjones.com/politic...-chinese-execs-access-to-trump-at-mar-a-lago/

3. Trump cabinet member, Alexander Acosta, bent over backwards, and broke the law to get a child sex trafficker and pedophile a light sentence:

https://www.miamiherald.com/news/local/article220097825.html

Low I Q seems to miss a lot of important news.
 
Lately hearings and testimonies. Page Strzok, Mueller, Barr, Zuckerberg, etc, follow the $, uranium,

But thats just a tiny drip from the bucketful of 3K+ drops dripping since 28 Oct 2017.


To me, a perhaps better answer to your question is 'the players page'

It has all the players' names, pics, captions, designated as traitor or patriot or unknown or neutral or pawn or flipped/freed or evil etc.





The beauty of 'players' is that it can be tasty fodder no matter what your taste. This likely will be apparent forthwith.

No matter what you think of Q, 'players' at least provides a 'who's who, of those mentioned by Q. Each player has a button linking to Q posts mentioning that player.

Was this helpful?

So basically, here's a laundry list of people and a bunch of cryptic nonsense. If something were to happen, hindsight will show that Q was trying to tell us all in advance something profound.

This is like some idiotic version of cold reading. Just keep spewing vague crap until you get a hit by dumb luck.

Bubba, how much longer before you realize there's no signal and only noise?
 
So basically, here's a laundry list of people and a bunch of cryptic nonsense. If something were to happen, hindsight will show that Q was trying to tell us all in advance something profound.

This is like some idiotic version of cold reading. Just keep spewing vague crap until you get a hit by dumb luck.

Bubba, how much longer before you realize there's no signal and only noise?



Its can seem cryptic to newbies or those wishing not to understand it.


The replies of some of your fellow critics indicate they have no difficulty comprehending it
 
Last edited:
Its can seem cryptic to newbies or those wishing not to understand it.


The replies of some of your fellow critics indicate they have no difficulty comprehending it

I understand it perfectly.

Some marginal personality loser is getting their jollies jerking off a bunch of folks who prefer being jerked hard over having hard facts.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom