Qanon Conspiracy theories

Status
Not open for further replies.
Just my opinion, but the beauty of this thing is that even if there should be indictments/hearing/whatever actions taken against any of those on Q's naughty list, we all can still say it has/had nothing to do with Q's predictions, no matter how closely details match Q's predictions, since Oct 2017. Lucky guess. End of story. We all knew it was coming so Q dont matter.
 
A guy, who recently murdered someone, having an interest in a particular conspiracy theory and scribbling things on his hands...

...hold on...

...checking...

...nope, it in no way validates anything.

ETA: Meanwhile, the Steele Dossier gets more and more credible all the time. Just to demonstrate what actual spooks are capable of in terms of credibility of their body of work, I offer that stark contrast.
 
Last edited:
What if its true the Steele dossier is a dnc/hillary product?

note: thats a question, not a statement
 
Bubba said:
What if its true the Steele dossier is a dnc/hillary product?

note: thats a question, not a statement
Click to expand...

It's a Steele product.

The first people who paid him for opposition research were Republican primary candidates, by the way.

P.S. way to entirely miss the point.
 
Stacko said:
The guy that is accused of murdering mobster Frank Cali was repping Q in court.

https://mobile.twitter.com/QanonAnonymous/status/1107744755612422144
Click to expand...

This guy is clearly the dumbest New Yorker in the history of the East Coast. The cops think he committed murder over the guy's niece, which means he gave no thought about who his victim was.

They don't prison cells that secure. The Gambinos will kill him over a period of hours, and the guards will all swear they didn't hear or see a thing.

Obviously Frank Cali would be considered an intellectual among the Qanon crowd.
 
Cosmic Yak said:
What does D5 mean, Bubba?

Note: that's a question, not a statement.
Click to expand...

bknight said:
You've got me curious now. ;)
Click to expand...

Horatius said:
The answer is out of this world!
Click to expand...

Horatius, you've nailed it! Not only have you solved the puzzle of the meaning of 'D5', you have also identified Q!

He's devious and amoral and unreliable and irresponsible and... and definitely not to be trusted.
Click to expand...

https://memory-alpha.fandom.com/wiki/Q
 
https://twitter.com/Popehat/status/1108100064595988480

Popehat on the veracity of the entire Q concept

Let me see if I understand this. There are 60k (or maybe 80k) “sealed indictments” against QAnon enemies. But none of the prosecutors or witnesses or grand jurors or judges or clerks involved (and there would have to be thousands) have leaked.

And so 60k people (assuming only one defendant per indictment, which would be unusual) will be arrested, requiring prettt much the entirety of federal law enforcement, none of whom know about it or leaked it.

Also, we don’t have to try 60,000 cases (more federal cases than we have in the entire country in a year) because there will be some sort of summary or extrajudicial process. Yet, for some reason, we are still getting indictments and sealing them.

Nobody amongst the tens of thousands of prosecutors, clerical workers, grand jurors, judges, clerks, or arresting law enforcement has friends or loved ones in the 60k defendants, notwithstanding the defendants are highly placed deep state.

I’m left with this question: how can anyone be stupid enough to believe this or pathetic enough to want to believe it?
Click to expand...
 
Careful, Bubba will indignantly lambaste you by pointing that that it’s actually less than 60k actual indictments, and therefore your whole (quoted) argument can be ignored. Never mind that the whole Q fantasy is a steaming heap of stupidity from start to finish, and that said fantasy is basically a projection of the actual corruption, treason, and degeneracy of the extended Trump crime family (including its lackeys and accomplices in Congress and elsewhere). You’ve quoted a number that is different than something he said in the past; that’s good for another dozen pages of passive-aggressive tapdancing.

Popehat said:
I’m left with this question: how can anyone be stupid enough to believe this or pathetic enough to want to believe it?
Click to expand...

Some people, apparently, enjoy being determinedly gullible.
 
I’m left with this question: how can anyone be stupid enough to believe this or pathetic enough to want to believe it?
Click to expand...


I imagine they're the legal equivalent of the worst types of Christians, who not-so-secretly enjoy the mental image of Those People writhing in agony while being tortured in hell.

These guys just love the image of Hillary et al. dealing with being in prison, and get off on thinking about it, logic be damned.
 
Horatius said:
I imagine they're the legal equivalent of the worst types of Christians, who not-so-secretly enjoy the mental image of Those People writhing in agony while being tortured in hell.

These guys just love the image of Hillary et al. dealing with being in prison, and get off on thinking about it, logic be damned.
Click to expand...

As are all the threads proposed here by CT's.
 
Horatius said:
I imagine they're the legal equivalent of the worst types of Christians, who not-so-secretly enjoy the mental image of Those People writhing in agony while being tortured in hell.

These guys just love the image of Hillary et al. dealing with being in prison, and get off on thinking about it, logic be damned.
Click to expand...

What’s extra-remarkable is that they center this fantasy on Donald Trump, of all people, as the leader of this great crusade. This is the guy who is still obsessing about John McCain, and is now whining that he wasn’t thanked for giving McCain an honorable funeral.

Well, considering the fetid stupidity that is the “Q” bilge, I guess it’s only appropriate that Q fans would base this fantasy on such a sniveling loser as Trump.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom