Qanon Conspiracy theories

Status
Not open for further replies.
Bubba said:
"It doesnt matter if Q is a hoax or not a hoax"....Qanon related efforts are increasing public awareness of important issues that are given little or no attention by MSM."
Click to expand...

That’s pretty funny (as in laughably absurd). But it’s a nice segue to admitting that Q was a bunch of malarkey all along, if you want to use it as your graceful exit.
 
Bubba said:
But...but...

You already know Q is a massive BS waste of time, yet you're still clicking and then no less than complaining about it?

They (ooops, I mean THEY) have meds for that. Or maybe just spend more time in nature
Click to expand...

It's generally accepted that reviewing evidence is part of making informed judgements.

Doing so is part of my particular method of making a determination.

So far, nothing I've run across on this Q douchebag leads me to believe it's anything more than an internet wet dream for losers.

Observant readers will note that only one poster here is citing Q, but is doing so in such a way as to claim both disdain and support for the material.

Bubba - go up thread and read my post 818:

http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showpost.php?p=12538771&postcount=818

I don't believe Q is acting out a wish fulfillment fantasy.

My belief is that whoever they are, they enjoy giving The Commandantes' fans a handy and watching them flail around in their worshipful St. Vitus dance over the greatness of their dear leader.

Here's one for Q fans.

The feds managed to shut down Silk Road, get a conviction on who ran the operation (there's a few honest questions not yet answered about that) and this was a truly international case - all without the suspenseful drama associated with this Q jerk-off.

Some people evidently like being stroked hard more than they want hard proof.

The fun for me comes in when this con job comes crashing down with their dear leader. At this point, he may end up indicted before any of Q's alleged pedo/demo/pinko cast of thousands.

This is how confident that I am that this Q material is ********.

Let's get a bet going - To Q supporters, I'll bet $100.00 U.S. dollars that there will be no massive indictments and convictions (they're asserting tens of thousands of sealed indictments, I'll be generous here, let's define massive as a minimum of 100 individuals) for a child sex trafficking ring before Trump is out of office (by whatever means)

If I win, the loser donates the C note to a group who actually works to protect kids:

https://protect.org/

Disclosure: I was a charter member way back when and remain so. Just so you know my heart is in the right place I'll match the $100.00 if you lose. I lose, you stipulate what charity my $100.00 goes to. If there's two Q supporters here to take this bet I'll take the action for both.

Ball is in the court of the Trump myrmidons/Q fanboys.

Where's your bet?
 
There's a liit to what I will bother to do here in terms of searching, but my cursory searches have found no "mainstream" video concentrating on the events mentioned here. They are of course edited to show what is presumed to be significant, but so far nobody seems to have found the envelope business very sgnificant. There are videos that seem to show it, but they cannot seem to agree on what is being shown, some saying the envelopes contain a simple "Q" which is said to have scared the bajeezus out of everyone, to a blank paper, to the contention that the participants were mannequins standing in for someone else....in other words, nuts. I am not suggesting that there were no envelopes, as such a thing would be pretty common and routine, but so far I see no evidence from anyone other than utter nut-jobs that the envelopes were of any real significance.

If there's anything in any video other than those put out by anyone other than those who follow Q or other extreme, even insane, ideas, those subscribing to Q would help their case by finding it.
 
When confronted with Defense Dept and State Dept Documents Revealing Obama Administration Knew that al Qaeda Terrorists Had Planned Benghazi Attack 10 Days in Advance, the Kool Aid drinkers resort to name calling and disproven conspiracy theories.



Axxman300 said:
Judicial Watch is a right-wing political harassment organization. The right-wing and the extreme left-wing in the US has been co-opted by Russia. I do not truck with enemies of the US.
Click to expand...



State, DOD, and DOJ documents trump name calling.
 
bruto said:
There's a liit to what I will bother to do here in terms of searching, but my cursory searches have found no "mainstream" video concentrating on the events mentioned here. They are of course edited to show what is presumed to be significant, but so far nobody seems to have found the envelope business very sgnificant. There are videos that seem to show it, but they cannot seem to agree on what is being shown, some saying the envelopes contain a simple "Q" which is said to have scared the bajeezus out of everyone, to a blank paper, to the contention that the participants were mannequins standing in for someone else....in other words, nuts. I am not suggesting that there were no envelopes, as such a thing would be pretty common and routine, but so far I see no evidence from anyone other than utter nut-jobs that the envelopes were of any real significance.

If there's anything in any video other than those put out by anyone other than those who follow Q or other extreme, even insane, ideas, those subscribing to Q would help their case by finding it.
Click to expand...


How would that help their case?


As I implied its a cheesy nothing burger served on a bun made of speculation. Even if "authentic" footage shows identical curious reactions by the Bushes No one will ever know anything more substantial about it. If it were anything fishy, Bushes are not about to admit it.
 
BStrong said:
It's generally accepted that reviewing evidence is part of making informed judgements.

Doing so is part of my particular method of making a determination.

So far, nothing I've run across on this Q douchebag leads me to believe it's anything more than an internet wet dream for losers.

Observant readers will note that only one poster here is citing Q, but is doing so in such a way as to claim both disdain and support for the material.

Bubba - go up thread and read my post 818:

http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showpost.php?p=12538771&postcount=818

I don't believe Q is acting out a wish fulfillment fantasy.

My belief is that whoever they are, they enjoy giving The Commandantes' fans a handy and watching them flail around in their worshipful St. Vitus dance over the greatness of their dear leader.

Here's one for Q fans.

The feds managed to shut down Silk Road, get a conviction on who ran the operation (there's a few honest questions not yet answered about that) and this was a truly international case - all without the suspenseful drama associated with this Q jerk-off.

Some people evidently like being stroked hard more than they want hard proof.

The fun for me comes in when this con job comes crashing down with their dear leader. At this point, he may end up indicted before any of Q's alleged pedo/demo/pinko cast of thousands.

This is how confident that I am that this Q material is ********.

Let's get a bet going - To Q supporters, I'll bet $100.00 U.S. dollars that there will be no massive indictments and convictions (they're asserting tens of thousands of sealed indictments, I'll be generous here, let's define massive as a minimum of 100 individuals) for a child sex trafficking ring before Trump is out of office (by whatever means)

If I win, the loser donates the C note to a group who actually works to protect kids:

https://protect.org/

Disclosure: I was a charter member way back when and remain so. Just so you know my heart is in the right place I'll match the $100.00 if you lose. I lose, you stipulate what charity my $100.00 goes to. If there's two Q supporters here to take this bet I'll take the action for both.

Ball is in the court of the Trump myrmidons/Q fanboys.

Where's your bet?
Click to expand...



Thats great you were a charter member of a good organization. Thanks for that good work!

Sorry, I'm not about to bet on something that I know might be a hoax. (in case you missed where I spelled out my position as such, a time or two)
 
sts60 said:
That’s pretty funny (as in laughably absurd). But it’s a nice segue to admitting that Q was a bunch of malarkey all along, if you want to use it as your graceful exit.
Click to expand...


Z-Z-Z-Z-Z-Z



Refer to what I told someone else


Sorry, I'm not about to bet on something that I know might be a hoax. (in case you missed where I spelled out my position as such, a time or two)
Click to expand...



This reminds me.....you fine upstanding chaps seem regularly reluctant to accept the fact I originally stated 'While I hope Q is not a hoax, I know it could be a hoax'

Pretending otherwise obviously serves your penchants for the behaviors seen here, although not all are so abusive. Therapy is available.
 
Bubba said:
When confronted with Defense Dept and State Dept Documents Revealing Obama Administration Knew that al Qaeda Terrorists Had Planned Benghazi Attack 10 Days in Advance, the Kool Aid drinkers resort to name calling and disproven conspiracy theories.

State, DOD, and DOJ documents trump name calling.
Click to expand...

There was a blanket security warning issued by the DIA and DoS warning of the possible attack in Libya. Ambassador Stevens ignored the warning and traveled from Tripoli to Benghazi. 9/11 is just not an American-friendly date in the Middle East these days, and everyone in the services knows this.

Benghazi was a DoS/CIA screw-up. The Ambassador was travelling without the standard security detail, mostly due to the GOP's budget sequestration restricting funding for security. And the DoS didn't coordinate with the CIA field station for security arrangements.

As it was we killed between 60 and 100 attackers.

The only "crime" was the Obama Administration choosing to lie about the attack's nature.
 
Axxman300 said:
There was a blanket security warning issued by the DIA and DoS warning of the possible attack in Libya. Ambassador Stevens ignored the warning and traveled from Tripoli to Benghazi. 9/11 is just not an American-friendly date in the Middle East these days, and everyone in the services knows this.



Benghazi was a DoS/CIA screw-up. The Ambassador was travelling without the standard security detail, mostly due to the GOP's budget sequestration restricting funding for security. And the DoS didn't coordinate with the CIA field station for security arrangements.



As it was we killed between 60 and 100 attackers.



The only "crime" was the Obama Administration choosing to lie about the attack's nature.
Click to expand...

At the point in the day when they were "lying" about it, it fit neatly into the context of a rolling series of protests across the region.

A lot of reputable journalists and international diplomats got that one wrong, too.
 
Delphic Oracle said:
At the point in the day when they were "lying" about it, it fit neatly into the context of a rolling series of protests across the region.

A lot of reputable journalists and international diplomats got that one wrong, too.
Click to expand...

It's just that the local intel in Libya, and across the Middle East was that something was in the works. My contact at the US Embassy in Algeria confirmed there were warnings, and for everyone to lay low in a secure location.

The fact is that they knew. They (the CIA, and GRS) knew who the attackers were at the time of the assault because the local militia commanders all had each other's phone numbers. It was no great mystery at DoS.

Overlooked is the fact that the CIA had set up shop in a dangerous location without enough security, and the Embassy Annex in Benghazi was less secure than your modern US public school. Stevens should have stayed in Tripoli at the main Embassy, and DSS should have been more forceful in making him do so.

As with Trump, a lot of journalists, and professional folk hear what they want to hear in regards to Obama. I don't blame him, his DoS, and NatSec adviser were "See No Evil" types, and were at odds with his DoD, and CIA which were realists. Obama tended to trust the wrong people at the wrong time.
 
Bubba said:
This reminds me.....you fine upstanding chaps seem regularly reluctant to accept the fact I originally stated 'While I hope Q is not a hoax, I know it could be a hoax'
Click to expand...

The problem is that non of your active interlocutors on this thread (myself included) believe you. This is based on your prior behavior on similar conspiracy threads, as well as your behavior on this thread.

Bubba said:
Pretending otherwise obviously serves your penchants for the behaviors seen here, although not all are so abusive. Therapy is available.
Click to expand...

Typically passive-aggressive projection. Kinda Trumpy.
 
by Bubba View Post
This reminds me.....you fine upstanding chaps seem regularly reluctant to accept the fact I originally stated 'While I hope Q is not a hoax, I know it could be a hoax'
Click to expand...



Like this:



Originally Posted by sts60

The problem is that non of your active interlocutors on this thread (myself included) believe you. This is based on your prior behavior on similar conspiracy threads, as well as your behavior on this thread.
Click to expand...



I expect most if not all Q followers know it might be bogus, whether they admit it or not.
 
Last edited:
I suspect Bolsonaro of being a poor choice, and someone who will do plenty of harm to Brazil, but instituting the law that's been in effect since time immemorial in Bernie Sanders's home state, while it may well be a bad thing for Brazil, is probably not going to cause American liberals' heads to explode.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom