Qanon Conspiracy theories

Status
Not open for further replies.
First off, you have repeatedly demonstrated that you lack the ability to judge anything news related.

I don't get news from CNN. I get it from Reuters, AP, and directly from reporters in the field via Twitter (yes, you can do that).



How long after Marrs and Estulin exposed Bilderberg was it that your trusty sources informed you of Bilderberg ?

Just round it up in decades if you cannot recall the exact number of years.
 
I suspect Bolsonaro of being a poor choice, and someone who will do plenty of harm to Brazil, but instituting the law that's been in effect since time immemorial in Bernie Sanders's home state, while it may well be a bad thing for Brazil, is probably not going to cause American liberals' heads to explode.


True, but they'd probably rather not have Americans noticing and speaking of such things, like the law that's been in effect since time immemorial in Bernie Sanders's home state and gun crime rate there. People might then compare those to places with stricter gun restrictions.
 
How long after Marrs and Estulin exposed Bilderberg was it that your trusty sources informed you of Bilderberg ?

Just round it up in decades if you cannot recall the exact number of years.

Nobody but paranoid nut-jobs care about Bilderberg.

Jim Marrs has made a living writing books for the gullible.
 
True, but they'd probably rather not have Americans noticing and speaking of such things, like the law that's been in effect since time immemorial in Bernie Sanders's home state and gun crime rate there. People might then compare those to places with stricter gun restrictions.

Vermont has a population of 626,042.
 
This means gun grabbers like Feinstein are eager to have Americans noticing and speaking of such things, like the law that's been in effect since time immemorial in Bernie Sanders's home state and gun crime rate there.




Vermont has a population of 626,042.
 
This thread isn’t really anymore about the crackpot Q conspiracy “theories”. It’s just pure right-wing virtue signaling and complaining by Bubba, bolstered by copious quoting of standard Klaymanesque crackpottery.
 
It was a simple statement. She compared an insecure border to leaving your doors unlocked, allowing strangers to walk into into your home.

Any ideas?

Nope. Always the name calling when nothing else is available.

You can do better.

I was expecting the equally insane Bachmann, for whom that spelling would have been correct.


Malkin? You've gone over to the dark side.*





*and you spelled her name wrong.
 
More lame name calling:


This thread isn’t really anymore about the crackpot Q conspiracy “theories”. It’s just pure right-wing virtue signaling and complaining by Bubba, bolstered by copious quoting of standard Klaymanesque crackpottery.






What do you call this....



Originally Posted by Trebuchet View Post
I was expecting the equally insane Bachmann, for whom that spelling would have been correct.



Originally Posted by Elagabalus View Post
Malkin? You've gone over to the dark side.*





*and you spelled her name wrong.





Border security is very much part of what Q is about.
 
Of course one of the biggest lies that our President and his cronies keep repeating is the nonsense that Democrats want an "open" border and no security. Anyone who is not a blithering fool with a right wing agenda could probably open up a few links on the internet and find pictures of the long, extensive fences and walls and barbed wire and patrols that exist on that so-called open border. Of course that would require admitting lies, so perhaps it's too much to ask.

There are no doubt flaws in the security, but that is not the same thing, and there might possibly be a tradeoff in the cost of making it completely secure, if that is even possible. That said, not everyone would consider the issue of national borders and the reasons for crossing them to be the same as letting strangers into your unlocked house. I have not bothered to open the video, but I would contend that if such a comparison is made it reveals a nasty, selfish and faulty way of thinking about the world. If it is true that my nation is my personal home it's clear that I ought to be exercising some better control over the corrupt, mendacious incompetents running it than about a handful of refugees.
 
Last edited:
More lame name calling:...

Border security is very much part of what Q is about.

Suppose, for the sake of argument, this last sentence is true. So what? It has nothing to do with the failed Q predictions and silly Pizzagate-type conspiracy claims you’ve touted in this thread. It’s simply a diversion from the fact that this thread has become basically a sounding board for you to parrot Trump talking points. Which, in itself, is a diversion from the inexhaustible supply of Q-Fail.

Your whining about this being called out is a diversion from both. I’m not interested.

So, you 3 are for open borders I take it...?

Repeating a lie doesn’t make it true. It just makes you a liar too.
 
When ya got nuthin, there's always name calling.

Not one mentally stable person cares about the conferences at the Bilderberg. It's just an international get together in an informal, non-binding setting to discuss global issues.

Why is this a bad thing? Why is talking to your neighbors a bad thing?

It's not name calling, it's properly identifying the nature of anti-Bilderberg fanatics.:thumbsup:
 
When ya got nuthin, there's always name calling.

like a paid sleeper agent demanding others here prove someone else is not a paid sleeper agent because you got nuthin?
 
Border security is very much part of what Q is about.

Just the southern border between the US and scary brown, Spanish-speaking people. No money is going to our northern border where white people live.

Should point out that there has been no increase in the US Coast Guard's budget, no plans for increasing their fleet to meet the growing demand for interdiction in the Gulf of Mexico, East Coast, and West Coast where drug smugglers are increasingly active. No increase for the USCG or USAF, or US Navy's surveillance aircraft to aid in interdiction of drug-smuggling aircraft. No additional funds for DEA FAST teams, and foreign operations. No additional funding for Customs operations, including new sensing equipment, and more agents. No increase in the size of the Border Patrol, nor new funding to expand BORTAC.

In short: Q is not interested in functional border security, just a wall racists can point to on the Mexican Border while Mexicans tunnel under their flat feet.
 
Of course one of the biggest lies that our President and his cronies keep repeating is the nonsense that Democrats want an "open" border and no security.

What I think is astonishing is the Trumpers who post videos of Obama, Pelosi or Schumer talking tough on immigration and how it's important to secure our borders to "prove" how hypocritical liberals are, then turn around and claim liberals want open borders, apparently having forgotten the evidence they posted contradicting that.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom