Qanon Conspiracy theories

Status
Not open for further replies.
I know exactly what was contained in the envelopes.

If that's true, then your link to that you-tube video was a deliberate waste of our time.

Instead of wasting our time with speculation that goes nowhere and proves nothing, you should just post your information.

Whoops! I just mistook you for Bubba! My appologies.
 
Originally Posted by BStrong View Post
I know exactly what was contained in the envelopes.


Originally Posted by Mycroft View Post
If that's true, then your link to that you-tube video was a deliberate waste of our time.

Instead of wasting our time with speculation that goes nowhere and proves nothing, you should just post your information.



Whoops! I just mistook you for Bubba! My appologies.



But...but...

You already know Q is a massive BS waste of time, yet you're still clicking and then no less than complaining about it?

They (ooops, I mean THEY) have meds for that. Or maybe just spend more time in nature
 
Last edited:
................................................ Challenger



Sad day. I met Onizuka at a county fair in Hilo. Typical of 'a nice island boy'. He was surrounded by a sea of Cub Scouts clamoring for his autograph. I asked him if nasa had warned him about this part of the job. He laughed and said Oh yeah they did. The memory made Challenger's demise more personal. There is a small nasa 'museum' with a memorial for him at Kona airport.
 
Last edited:
Seems unlikely per agenda (CT) motive factor. Muting the dramatic narrator seems to work well enough. His slow motion breakdown helps show where W nudges Laura and she begins reading while casket passes.





Come to think of it it is the kind of thing (fishy or not) that MSM would not wanna call attention to, just in case it makes people think/question and begin following elsewhere.






As Q followers see it, it was some a move by Trump. on the big chessboard behind the stage curtain. Hence leaking the envelope contents is the last thing the envelope recipients would do.

As usual you miss the point. I'm not asking whether mainstream news calls attention to the event. I'm asking whether the event appears at all in any video that is not traceable back to Q conspiracy nuts, not more quack theories "as Q followers see it."

I'm not saying it's not there. I'm just saying I can't find it. The coverage of the funeral is long and boring. Tell us where to look without sending us to the same old Q nutbars.
 
As usual you miss the point. I'm not asking whether mainstream news calls attention to the event. I'm asking whether the event appears at all in any video that is not traceable back to Q conspiracy nuts, not more quack theories "as Q followers see it."


Didnt really miss your point....I just could not bring myself to conclude that you distrusted ie the video might be doctored. (if that is why you want different source)

Surely MSM has the entire thing. Ask the Q nutbar where he got it.


I'm not saying it's not there.


I understood that. I only meant that MSM surely would not address the Q-nut questions. I'm sure they have the entire memorial service on file.


I'm just saying I can't find it. The coverage of the funeral is long and boring. Tell us where to look without sending us to the same old Q nutbars.


Why does it matter?......you think the Q nutbar doctored the footage....? In this case that seems unlikely to me. So I muted the wishful words of the nutbar narrator, and appreciated his helpful slow motion treatment of the Bushes' actions.

The Q nutbar video is only 6 minutes anyway....and much shorter if you skip the repetitions of the Bushes actions. The slo mo part is only a min or two. The other part with swampsters discovering their envelopes is way less interesting.

If it is the Bushes reading you're looking for, and if you should locate a non-Q-nut version, it should be easy to find the Bushes reading. Scroll to when the casket passes the front row.
 
Last edited:
Members here are that naive ?

You gotta be kidding, or maybe just a kid. Like the one here that thought "the term MIC was coined by Ike" was a conspiracy theory.

Believe it or not, there really is such a thing as political bias in media.

Here are 2 of many alternative (less censored) news sites .....


https://www.projectcensored.org/


https://voiceofeurope.com/

No, we just know how newspapers and news outlets work.

They have editors, and they have limited space, or limited air-time meaning some stories don't make the cut. Not every story is so important that it merits national or international coverage. These stories aren't censored, they're just aren't all that interesting beyond their limited sphere of influence.

Other stories are obvious BS, and have no place in legitimate news coverage, even if only to make fun of them. Example: a tornado rips through a small, Kansas town. The media shows up to film the damage, interview survivors, and take statements from first-responders. The reporters run into two people who want the world to know that Jews cause tornadoes, and demand to be interviewed, and once rejected these clowns claim media suppression. Just because some moron has a counter theory does not mean he or she should have equal time with experts, or people who are not morons.

Q is a clearing-house for morons.
 
No, we just know how newspapers and news outlets work.



You cannot be serious. Really? You're serious?



They have editors, and they have limited space, or limited air-time meaning some stories don't make the cut. Not every story is so important that it merits national or international coverage. These stories aren't censored, they're just aren't all that interesting beyond their limited sphere of influence.


You cannot possibly be serious. Really and truly?

Holy Horse Manure !! You actually are serious!


we just know how newspapers and news outlets work.


Begging to differ your Honor....

Top 10 Fake News Stories The Liberal Media Trafficked In 2018


they have limited space, or limited air-time meaning some stories don't make the cut.


Just wow.......Omitting a high profile important national nation splitting story (see #7) is also fake (lying) news reporting.
 
Last edited:
companies like Google have a political agenda

!

No no, not Google. Google would never......


Here, let CNN :dl: help :dl: Google :dl: explain...


Google CEO: 'We do not bias our products to favor any political agenda'

https://money.cnn.com/2018/09/23/technology/sundar-pichai-google-memo/index.html


What?

What's this?


Forget Wall Street – Silicon Valley is the new political power in Washington

https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2017/sep/03/silicon-valley-politics-lobbying-washington
 
Last edited:
Q and his action committee is obviously waiting for the perfect moment to strike ...
which would have been about one month after Trump's inauguration.
They are now waiting for the next window of opportunity in 2021.
 
Didnt really miss your point....I just could not bring myself to conclude that you distrusted ie the video might be doctored. (if that is why you want different source)

Surely MSM has the entire thing. Ask the Q nutbar where he got it.





I understood that. I only meant that MSM surely would not address the Q-nut questions. I'm sure they have the entire memorial service on file.





Why does it matter?......you think the Q nutbar doctored the footage....? In this case that seems unlikely to me. So I muted the wishful words of the nutbar narrator, and appreciated his helpful slow motion treatment of the Bushes' actions.

The Q nutbar video is only 6 minutes anyway....and much shorter if you skip the repetitions of the Bushes actions. The slo mo part is only a min or two. The other part with swampsters discovering their envelopes is way less interesting.

If it is the Bushes reading you're looking for, and if you should locate a non-Q-nut version, it should be easy to find the Bushes reading. Scroll to when the casket passes the front row.

If a Q nutbar did not doctor the video then it should be possible to find it. I can't. Can you?
 
undercover cameraman works among Democratic Socialists working at DOJ

May I suggest the item below as an example of :

"It doesnt matter if Q is a hoax or not a hoax"....Qanon related efforts are increasing public awareness of important issues that are given little or no attention by MSM."



Project Veritas cameras expose Democratic Socialists working in Fed govt. They brag and admit that while on the job they work against American interests as part of 'the resistance'.

excerpts:

...instead of doing my job, I mostly just F things up at work...I dont leave a paper trail...I have nothing to lose, its impossible to fire federal employees...Resist everything, Fu** Sh** up. (yes he said that}
-Stuart Karaffa, management & program analyst at DOS,

'I'm a paralegal at DOJ...we can run license plates to identify people then use DOJ resources to F them up...as federal employees we cant get fired'
-Allison Hrabar (she got fired after Project Veritas exposed her .)

'we could get fired if they knew what we are doing here'
-Natarajan Subrmanian


https://www.bitchute.com/video/D9gDWqNL0p2o/
 
Last edited:
If a Q nutbar did not doctor the video then it should be possible to find it. I can't. Can you?



Now I think I understand that you are saying or suspecting a Q nutbar could have doctored the video. Did I get it right this time?

I'm sure that a doctored video is a possibility. This seems far fetched to me, considering the content. Although I know next to nothing about ease vs complexity in the video doctoring business.

If no other version exists showing the casket passing the front row between the camera and the Bushes, I'd wager that we're clearly not in Kansas anymore, Toto.

Thanks for clarifying your position for me.

No, I have not looked for a non-Qnut version. Let me know if you find one where the Bushes segment contradicts the Q-nut version. The segment begins where the casket allegedly bearing GHWB passes W on its way to Heaven. Or, you know, that other place.

I might go looking for other footage if this issue was actually important. But it isn't.....Because.....

.....As it is, it apparently relies on (partisan) interpretations of everyday events whose true nature probably cannot be ascertained conclusively, even if those people were grilled after swearing under oath to provide the truth. Only they can know for sure.

Whoa, Stop the presses !.... even if they think they are truthful, or even if they think they are lying intentionally....they could be mistaken, what with that now proven unreliable memory business and all.

Shall we ever truly know Truth?


Ampersand:

Essential trivia was noted during the research phase of composing this post:


Terry, the dog that played Toto in the 1939 screen adaptation of The Wizard of Oz, was a brindle Cairn terrier.
 
You cannot be serious. Really? You're serious?

You cannot possibly be serious. Really and truly?

Holy Horse Manure !! You actually are serious!

Begging to differ your Honor....

Top 10 Fake News Stories The Liberal Media Trafficked In 2018


Just wow.......Omitting a high profile important national nation splitting story (see #7) is also fake (lying) news reporting.

First off, you have repeatedly demonstrated that you lack the ability to judge anything news related.

I don't get news from CNN. I get it from Reuters, AP, and directly from reporters in the field via Twitter (yes, you can do that).
 
self aggrandizing 'press releases' (lmao!) for grifting purposes are not news worthy. especially when, as with all the other klayman 'lawsuits' (FOIA requests. lmao!), they go nowhere since that is his intention.
 
May I suggest the item below as an example of :

"It doesnt matter if Q is a hoax or not a hoax"....Qanon related efforts are increasing public awareness of important issues that are given little or no attention by MSM."

:dl:


Since James O'Keefe (your source) has taken everything out of context what can we really know?


'I'm a paralegal at DOJ...we can run license plates to identify people then use DOJ resources to F them up...as federal employees we cant get fired'
-Allison Hrabar (she got fired after Project Veritas exposed her .)

So she WAS fired.

Cool site, btw.

With titles such as: "1974 The Year Canadians gave away their future to the BILDERBERG GROUP"

"Werner Heisenberg and Jewish Science"

I think I understand now who is to blame. (((wink)))
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom