Cont: Qanon Conspiracy Theories Part Two

[Leftus]

The point around Wayfair is...common sense and LEO disclosures tell us perverts operate internationally, online. Period.

The connection is that Wayfair is online, and perverts are online so … Well, Bubba is online, and perverts are online so …

The Wayfair assertions, true or not, represent a plausible example of how they might do it

At no point in time did you or anyone else provide an example of how they might do it. It was just an assertion that they do it.

On Wayfair (or some similar suspected site I saw), 100% of the titles of books arranged on a corner bookshelf in one of the kid furnishings ad pages suggested weirdo pedo/satanic crap. Just sayin.

Odd you know how to arrange books on a shelf in a corner to suggest weirdo pedo and satanic crap. But you are online, as are satanic pedos.

Just sayin. With exactly the same amount of proof.

 

[Bubba]

Come up with something better. Maybe something evidence based rather than fevered opinions.

As you apparently heard Bezmenov say, nations fell to communism in accordance with the play book he warned about.

 

[Bubba]

Example of overlooking reality (ie denial) of why Bezmenov defected from Russia to Canada.

Bernays? Bezmenov? Folk who were paid to tell lies for a living. Not the first by any means (IIRC Machiavelli had a few ideas on that one) and not the last.

So what? They're well enough known and critiqued.

Writing about modern propaganda technique is not being paid to lie, even if Bernays did that too.

 

[Bubba]

Come up with something better. Maybe something evidence based rather than fevered opinions.

Professors are on the record documenting the changes on our campuses. One of them, in writings, (and on Bill Maher's show) reported the earliest appearance of "politically correct" speech was in the early eighties, per Bezmenov's schedule. It has gone downhill to the point we are at today. Look up the trailer for "No Safe Spaces" and see for yourself. Try to see the message instead of shooting the messenger.


No Safe Spaces trailer

 

[Bubba]

by Resume
evidence [/QUOTE]


=



https://veilofreality.com/2020/10/15/usa-freedom-and-the-story-of-my-father-a-lesson-in-history-for-the-times-were-in/?fbclid=IwAR3sXYo2fQn8E2ZddjMRZO6pe5KMdTXY0pt6Y2dBNCZDW-mOnmFHf0I6l2w

 

[Bubba]

by Resume
evidence [/quote]


https://medium.com/@toycritic/lets-define-socialism-accurately-for-a-change-fc51a5558607

 

[Bubba]

You have no idea what evidence is comrade, and until you gain some degree of discernment . . . well, I won't hold my breath.

Edited by zooterkin: 

<SNIP>
Edited for rule 0 and rule 12.

 

[Resume]

erp

Claim.

 

[Resume]

Do tell . . .

Myself and others have been pointing out your credulous failings for awhile now and it seems impervious comrade. So more telling will not help.

 

[Bubba]

The observation was:

"On Wayfair (or some similar suspected site I saw), 100% of the titles of books arranged on a corner bookshelf in one of the kid furnishings ad pages suggested weirdo pedo/satanic crap."



Note the intellectual dishonesty in the twisting of the above observation.

Odd you know how to arrange books on a shelf in a corner to suggest weirdo pedo and satanic crap. But you are online, as are satanic pedos.

Just sayin. With exactly the same amount of proof.

Rejected.


Reason: Intellectual dishonesty

 

[Bubba]

Myself and others have been pointing out your credulous failings for awhile now and it seems impervious comrade. So more telling will not help.

Rejected.

Reason: Terminal lameness.

 

[Resume]

Terminal lameness.

Yes, all your baseless claims are terminally lazy. And useless. You plagiarism, which has been pointed out several times by several posters, is lazy as well as dishonest.

 

[Bubba]

Horse not thirsty?

 

[Resume]

Horse not thirsty?

No OBAMAGATE!!

No PIZZAGATE!!

No WAYFAIRGATE!!

No frogmarching.

No mass arrests.

No soup for you, ever.

 

[Leftus]

The observation was:

"On Wayfair (or some similar suspected site I saw), 100% of the titles of books arranged on a corner bookshelf in one of the kid furnishings ad pages suggested weirdo pedo/satanic crap."


Note the intellectual dishonesty in the twisting of the above observation.

Rejected.

Reason: Intellectual dishonesty

So you saw some ad, you can't produce, which contained suggestions of weirdo pedo/satanic crap, that you were able to identify, by intimate knowledge of weirdo satanic/pedo book stacking? And me pointing this out is intellectually dishonest? How, exactly, did you learn the art of weirdo satanic pedo book arranging in a corner bookcase?

But I was right about everything else, since it's not in dispute.

 

[Bubba]

So you saw some ad, you can't produce, which contained suggestions of weirdo pedo/satanic crap, that you were able to identify, by intimate knowledge of weirdo satanic/pedo book stacking? And me pointing this out is intellectually dishonest? How, exactly, did you learn the art of weirdo satanic pedo book arranging in a corner bookcase?

.

Failed.
Reason: Reading comprehension. My term "book titles" was the subject, not the "book stacking" you mistakenly introduced.


Rejected.
Reason: Intellectual dishonesty, (again)...changing words per an agenda (to smear)

For your convenience and edification, here it is again:

The observation was:

"On Wayfair (or some similar suspected site I saw), 100% of the titles of books arranged on a corner bookshelf in one of the kid furnishings ad pages suggested weirdo pedo/satanic crap."


Try again. Good luck. If you strike out a third time, you still get more chances

 

[Bubba]

No OBAMAGATE!!

No PIZZAGATE!!

No WAYFAIRGATE!!

No frogmarching.

No mass arrests.

No soup for you, ever.

No response regarding the new anti free speech phenomena (never seen before at colleges) corroborating Bezmenov's warning??

You didnt even try to shoot the messenger.


Perhaps you missed it....here it is again for your convenience.


No Safe Spaces Trailer

 

[Leftus]

Failed reading comprehension.

Reason: My "book titles" was the subject, not the "book stacking" you mistakenly introduced.


Rejected.
Reason: Intellectual dishonesty, (again)...changing words per an agenda (to smear)

For your convenience and edification, here it is again:

The observation was:

"On Wayfair (or some similar suspected site I saw), 100% of the titles of books arranged on a corner bookshelf in one of the kid furnishings ad pages suggested weirdo pedo/satanic crap."


Try again. Good luck. If you strike out a third time, you still get more chances

Smear? Hardly. I'm just putting out conjecture that may or may not be true for the sake of discussion. Where is the harm in that?

I'm happy that you've managed to acknowledge your intimate knowledge of weirdo satanic and pedo texts and know them to spot them in an ad by their titles. Eclectic reading list?

 

[Bubba]

Smear? Hardly. I'm just putting out conjecture that may or may not be true for the sake of discussion. Where is the harm in that?

I'm happy that you've managed to acknowledge your intimate knowledge of weirdo satanic and pedo texts and know them to spot them in an ad by their titles. Eclectic reading list?

Failed.


The titles alone (not stacking) suggested content. For all I know, they were made up titles.


When you failed with "stacking" you sought another way to smear. (and failed again)

Nice guy.

 

[Bubba]

More messengers for shooting:


1) Attack the author.

2) Smear the nurse with whatever you got handy


NHS Nurse Publicly Resigns, Blasts COVID Lockdown Policy