Cont: Qanon Conspiracy Theories Part Two

[Matthew Ellard]

Discussion never happens. It is practically verboten here.

So Bubba? Discuss something with us? If you and Q-Anon claims Trump is secretly working behind the scenes to arrest paedophiles, how come there were no arrests and the number of federal prosecutions reduced during the Trump administration?

Secondly, do you and Q-Anon think Trump will continue this work after he retires to Mar-a-Lago, in two months, perhaps with Trump forming a posse with the gardening staff and waiters?

Do you think Trump will hand down his dossier of collected paedophile evidence to the new Democrat Federal Attorney General, or will he keep it quiet to keep protecting paedophiles?

 

[Bubba]

No Bubba, it's called requiring evidence for a claim; an "interesting" claim is still a claim. The time to accept a claim is when there is sufficient evidence, not before.

See, that's the thing; the older I get, the more I realize I'm not nearly as smart as I think I am, and neither is anyone else --well, mostly -- so to make sure I'm on the right path, I require good, solid, objective evidence sufficient to the claim. This way, I believe as few false things as possible. I also make adjustments to my position as more data becomes available.

Nice...and here you are part of a circle jerk, willfully or not.

 

[Bubba]

How about Bernays and Bezmenov...what is your take on their statements...as a real true skeptic..?

 

[Matthew Ellard]

How about Bezmenov...what is your take on their statements...as a real true skeptic..?

Considering he was a journalist writing lies for the KGB before it was dissolved in 1991, it is obvious more current SVR officers have been better at writing lies. They got Trump in, remember?

 

[Matthew Ellard]

How Bezmenov...what is your take on their statements...as a real true skeptic..?

See above.

Вы можете поблагодарить меня позже. Я не был на Лубянке, в Москве с 2014 года.

 

[Resume]

Nice...and here you are part of a circle jerk, willfully or not.

I am sorry you are so easily gulled, but there it is.

 

[Bubba]

No Bubba, Wayfair et al is bull ****. That you couldn't discern this from the very beginning is telling.

But good on you for exhibiting some skepticism regarding the Q nonsense; now apply that to the rest of the crap.

The point around Wayfair is...common sense and LEO disclosures tell us perverts operate internationally, online. Period.

It is happening.

The Wayfair assertions, true or not, represent a plausible example of how they might do it

On Wayfair (or some similar suspected site I saw), 100% of the titles of books arranged on a corner bookshelf in one of the kid furnishings ad pages suggested weirdo pedo/satanic crap. Just sayin.

Its easy for people that dont put the time in to dismiss claims as crazy tin foil.

 

[Bubba]

I am sorry you are so easily gulled, but there it is.

Ya think I was gulled by Bezmenov too??

 

[Resume]

The point around Wayfair is...common sense

No, that's not it. It's stupid, and only the easily gulled fell for it. I feel sorry for them.

 

[Matthew Ellard]

Bernays is deemed the father of propaganda.

"His best-known campaigns include a 1929 effort to promote female smoking by branding cigarettes as feminist "Torches of Freedom",

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Torches_of_Freedom

That's great Bubba. You keep smoking at Q-Anon rallies to show your "freedom".

 

[Resume]

Ya think I was gulled by Bezmenov too??

I think you've been gulled by almost everyone, including IRS agents with strange accents named Dave Miller.

 

[Bubba]

Whats your take on what Bezmenov said??

 

[Matthew Ellard]

The Wayfair assertions, true or not, represent a plausible example of how they might do it

So you still think Wayfair deliver children in flat pack furniture boxes?

So how do they get the children back? You keep forgetting that bit.

 

[Resume]

Whats your take on what Bezmenov said??

My take is you've been taken, and rather than admit you've been taken, you will double down stubbornly.

 

[Matthew Ellard]

Whats your take on what Bezmenov said??

Where is your discussion?

 

[Bubba]

My take is you've been taken, and rather than admit you've been taken, you will double down stubbornly.

Did you see and hear Bezmenov??

 

[Resume]

Did you see and hear Bezmenov??

You still don't understand the difference between claims and evidence. I fear you never will, comrade.

 

[Bubba]

by Resume View Post
My take is you've been taken, and rather than admit you've been taken, you will double down stubbornly.

This degree of certainty requires seeing and hearing Bezmenov before passing judgement.


Did you see and hear Bezmenov??

 

[Bubba]

You still don't understand the difference between claims and evidence. I fear you never will, comrade.

The evidence confirms Bemenov's claims (warning)

Did you see and hear Bezmenov??

If not, your statement fails.

 

[Resume]

This degree of certainty requires seeing and hearing Bezmenov before passing judgement.


Did you see and hear Bezmenov??

Why would anyone lend any credence to an ex KGB propagandist? Beyond credulity I mean.

Get some discernment comrade Bubba.