• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Psychic Detectives are real

polomontana said:
CFLarsen,

I will concede you your point. Kay Rhea didn't help in the Mark Klass case. What does that have to do with the price of tea in China? That says nothing about her helping in cases that were solved.
Click to expand...

I am certain that polomntana is not a sincere poster. He wacks off as he reads what ******** he created. Start a new detective story or thi one will die soon, and your ******** claim to flame you jerk.
 
Drudgwire,

He said "without using the psychic, we probably would have never solved the case." That has nothing to do with his personal beliefs about psychics. His professional opinion "without using the psychic, we probably would have never solved the case."

This actually proves my point that detectives don't allow their personal belief systems stand in the way of solving the crime.
 
Notice that we are now off the pseudo-quantum mechanics BS and back to the detectives.
 
SezMe said:
Rodney, that's fantastic. Jordan did a good job. Since he was so central to solving the case, his testimony would be the keystone to the prosecution's case. So Jordan must certainly have testified in the case. Did he?
Click to expand...
Why would he testify? The point is that, according to the newspaper article, the police thought he was highly accurate. Do you have any evidence to suggest that he wasn't?

SezMe said:
ETA: BTW, your post, which contained no indication it was taken from another source, was cribbed from here. Naughty, naughty, naughty. You do that again and I'm going to report your sorry butt.
Click to expand...
Try reading the thread before making accusations. I "cribbed" from Thitical Crinker's post #281 on this thread. I saw no reason to post the link again.
 
Moochie said:
Given the public's appetite for all things woo, it really isn't surprising that an enterprising production company should seek to capitalize on that appetite (the cynical, jaded bastards that they are). As long as there are Rodneys and Polomyopics around, they cannot but succeed.

It's almost a win-win-win-win situation. The production company profits by selling this gumpf to a gullible public; Jordan profits from the bump his fading "career" will get; some superannuated cops will recapture their glory days (and probably receive a nice little annuity to see them through); and the moronic public who gobble this rubbish up will feel well nourished -- if a diet totally lacking in any nutrients can be said to nourish.

Oh how one wishes for a deity who could bitch-slap some sense into these people...

M.
Click to expand...
So do YOU have any evidence that disputes the newspaper account about Jordan's accuracy in this case? If so, let's hear it.
 
What about the questions about doctors and drug companies?
As for psychics showing you what is "real," all it shows me is how desperate you are to believe in them. I was once like you in that regard, but I have seen the evidence, or rather, the utter lack of it, and altered my views accordingly. That is what being a skeptic is all about. NOT latching onto a fantasy and sticking with it no matter what.
Are you really serious, Polomontana, or are you just a troll? If you are serious, welcome to the forum and by all means let us all continue the discussion. Answer the questions already posed to you, please, and present the evidence you have been asked for.
If you are a troll, please just go away. We have enough of those already.
 
Rodney said:
Why would he testify? The point is that, according to the newspaper article, the police thought he was highly accurate. Do you have any evidence to suggest that he wasn't?
Click to expand...

You must be joking. Probable cause derived from a psychic is a defense attoney's wet dream, Rodney!

I'm not an attorney (but have some legal training) and even I would know what had just fallen into my lap. Thank you, FSM! :eek:
 
Slimething said:
You must be joking. Probable cause derived from a psychic is a defense attoney's wet dream, Rodney!

I'm not an attorney (but have some legal training) and even I would know what had just fallen into my lap. Thank you, FSM! :eek:
Click to expand...
So, can YOU refute the newspaper account about Jordan's accuracy in this case?
 
JoeEllison said:
... but people would probably point and laugh.
Click to expand...

And rightly so,for that would be a ridiculous thing for any attorney to say. It is almost as ridiculous as bringing in a "psychic" witness.

"Please tell us what you saw."

"I saw an image. It was a person near some water. The person was sad and scared. The person was murdered. The person is near the water and maybe a bush..no i mean a shrub, or perhaps a small tree."
 
this charming man said:
And rightly so,for that would be a ridiculous thing for any attorney to say. It is almost as ridiculous as bringing in a "psychic" witness.

"Please tell us what you saw."

"I saw an image. It was a person near some water. The person was sad and scared. The person was murdered. The person is near the water and maybe a bush..no i mean a shrub, or perhaps a small tree."
Click to expand...
"The killer went north, or possibly south. Probably someone they knew, or maybe a stranger. My powers only work perfectly in retrospect..."
 
The so called psychics make thousands of predictions. The have an occasional correct lucky guess or crib the story details from elsewhere. They claim to solve hundreds of crimes but only ever point to one or two of their "successes". They lie like hell and when anybody bothers to investigate they are proven to be liers.

If they actually had any use at all, rather than getting in the way of real police investigations and making money off the misery of grieving relatives, all the police departments in the world would have them on staff. None do.

:mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad:
 
Gord_in_Toronto said:
The so called psychics make thousands of predictions. The have an occasional correct lucky guess or crib the story details from elsewhere. They claim to solve hundreds of crimes but only ever point to one or two of their "successes". They lie like hell and when anybody bothers to investigate they are proven to be liers.

If they actually had any use at all, rather than getting in the way of real police investigations and making money off the misery of grieving relatives, all the police departments in the world would have them on staff. None do.

:mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad:
Click to expand...
Hell, look at the Rhea fraud. That liar claims that she finds "3-4 a week". Say it is really two per week: that's around a hundred cases PER YEAR that she claims to assist in. How come her one and only supporter can only quote one claim, from that one TV show, over and over, when she claims to have assisted in HUNDREDS of cases?

An intelligent, rational human being can only assume that she's a lying piece of crap who has suckered anyone unfortunate enough to believe her nonsense.
 
polomontana said:
Drudgwire,

He said "without using the psychic, we probably would have never solved the case." That has nothing to do with his personal beliefs about psychics. His professional opinion "without using the psychic, we probably would have never solved the case."

This actually proves my point that detectives don't allow their personal belief systems stand in the way of solving the crime.
Click to expand...

And police never plant evidence.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom