DC
Banned
- Joined
- Mar 20, 2008
- Messages
- 23,064
I'll did my best![]()
me too. If I were in my 20's or 30's again and at a house of ill repute and I saw a 16 year old girl in the lineup I'd definitely pick an older woman .well im fine with 18 or even 21, but 16 strikes me as wrong.
on the other hand, i have to agree with George Carlin![]()
Because US laws which have to do with morality are in serious cognitive dissonance?Why is it that prostitution is illegal (in almost all of the U.S.) but being paid to have sex in a pornographic movie isn't?
I read about a brothel in Chicago which tried more ot less that. They would film the clients and charge them for "acting lessons". It did not stand up in court.I have always wondered, would hiring a prostitute be legal if you give a friend $5 to film it?
Even worse cognitive dissonance -- in most US states it is entirely legal to have sex with a 17 year old (as long as no money changes handsWhy is it that prostitution is illegal (in almost all of the U.S.) but being paid to have sex in a pornographic movie isn't?
Should prostitution be legal? and when yes, from what age on?
In my country it is totally legal to work as a prostitute when you are 16 or older.
There are since a long time debates about that.
Prostitution is seen as a economic sector and from on 16 you don't have to go to school anymore and are allowed to work. this includes prostitution if you want.
what do you think? is 16 ok or should it be 18 or 21?
http://www.ksmm.admin.ch/ksmm/en/home/themen/siehe_auch___/prostitution.html
I'm no expert here but legal ages of consent are completely decided by the society that enforces them so trying to raise an objective argument as to why it should not be 16 is useless.
No,it shouldn't be legal at all,what he nass is wrong with you people?
I thought we were supposed to be better than animals.
Should rape be legal? Why not? Gotta copulate right? We're just animals anyways.
Probably due to performance pressure.I read about a brothel in Chicago which tried more ot less that. They would film the clients and charge them for "acting lessons". It did not stand up in court.
I really like Japanese approach: sex for money is legal, but ANY third-party involvement is not. No pimps, no "liaison agents", and no pressuring anyone into prostitution. If a Japanese woman has no money for rent and decides to place an online ad for sex services, she is within law. If her landlord suggests she place an online ad for sex services, the landlord is very much not within law.I don't have a personal problem with prostitution being legal, but it would have to be controlled more strictly than, say, massage parlors (ones with no happy endings, obviously). Namely, we'd have to go to lengths to make pimping as difficult as possible, perhaps making the only legal form of prostitution self-employment.
I really like Japanese approach: sex for money is legal, but ANY third-party involvement is not. No pimps, no "liaison agents", and no pressuring anyone into prostitution. If a Japanese woman has no money for rent and decides to place an online ad for sex services, she is within law. If her landlord suggests she place an online ad for sex services, the landlord is very much not within law.
I really like Japanese approach: sex for money is legal, but ANY third-party involvement is not. No pimps, no "liaison agents", and no pressuring anyone into prostitution. If a Japanese woman has no money for rent and decides to place an online ad for sex services, she is within law. If her landlord suggests she place an online ad for sex services, the landlord is very much not within law.
Even worse cognitive dissonance -- in most US states it is entirely legal to have sex with a 17 year old (as long as no money changes hands), but you can go to jail for taking a naked picture of her. Worse still, SHE can go to jail for taking a naked picture of herself and posting it on the web
(Let's start talking about the MILF's. They exploit me yet I don't care. )
Why stay (or start) with some guy that takes all the money you make, treats you like crap, etc, when you can instead work for Happy Ho, Inc., with medical benefits, education benefits, company policies to prevent harassment, and a 401(k)?
I don't have a personal problem with prostitution being legal, but it would have to be controlled more strictly than, say, massage parlors (ones with no happy endings, obviously). Namely, we'd have to go to lengths to make pimping as difficult as possible, perhaps making the only legal form of prostitution self-employment. It would also be necessary to make sure the social security network is tight enough so that no one is forced to the field. Of course, that's necessary now, too.
You do realize that legalizing prostitution would actually reduce rape rates?bynmdsue said:Should rape be legal? Why not? Gotta copulate right? We're just animals anyways.
Is it? I recall rather recently hearing something about a guy in Nevada who was not allowed to work in the business because it is only allowed for woman.btw, Prostitution also is legal for men.
Now, imagine it legalized, with legitimate business enterprises. Why stay (or start) with some guy that takes all the money you make, treats you like crap, etc, when you can instead work for Happy Ho, Inc., with medical benefits, education benefits, company policies to prevent harassment, and a 401(k)?
Why is it that prostitution is illegal (in almost all of the U.S.) but being paid to have sex in a pornographic movie isn't?
You are right of course, and perhaps I went overboard with "really like" Japanese approach. It looks at the problem -- women abused by pimps, -- and takes a sledgehammer to it instead of a scalpel. A more nuanced approach such as one you describe would benefit women more if done right -- but is also vulnerable to corruption. Organized crime and human trafficking are much more likely to latch onto legal (and theoretically regulated) prostitution than onto self-employment only.I dunno. If legitimized, then I don't see a problem with it assuming they Are afforded the same rights and protections as any other employee in any other business. Of course self-employment is fine, but if you look at it as a legitimate business then you're essentially denying anyone in that field the advantages that come with working as part of an organization: things like group insurance, access to better quality materials, larger advertising budget, and similar things.
DC does not live in US. He may have been talking about his country (Switzerland?).Is it? I recall rather recently hearing something about a guy in Nevada who was not allowed to work in the business because it is only allowed for woman.btw, Prostitution also is legal for men.