Travis
Misanthrope of the Mountains
- Joined
- Mar 31, 2007
- Messages
- 24,133
One question at a time, please.
How about the very first one then.
One question at a time, please.
Cuddles,
Oh, Christ! Please don't tell me that I typo'ed Peephole's handle as "Peehole" or something similar (the post has been amended so I don't know what the offensive material was). I swear that if that is what the breach of Rule 12 was about it was a typo, unintentional, stupid on my part for not looking closely before posting and I profusely apologize. Gads. I even do my long posts in MS Word and copy/paste after looking them over first. Damn!
I am a Mod and Site Admin on another site, I have a reputation to uphold and I swear on my honor that I would never knowlingly do that.
Darby
How about the very first one then.
What's the question?
Running low on material?Baloney.
Do you really think that homosexuals get sick more often?
Because, as you know, every homosexual has AIDS.Yes. And AIDs can be especially damaging to their health, and well as other STDs and diseases.
Pregnancy (the result of heterosexual sex) is risky. And in fact, before modern medicine and technology pregnancy was very risky often resulting in death.Yes. And AIDs can be especially damaging to their health, and well as other STDs and diseases.
Pregnancy (the result of heterosexual sex) is risky. And in fact, before modern medicine and technology pregnancy was very risky often resulting in death.
By your logic heterosexual sex is bad.
Heterosex and pregnancy creates life; homosexuality and AIDs brings death.
Heterosex and pregnancy creates life; homosexuality and AIDs brings [sic] death.
Doesn't change the fact that it is risky. You are now moving your goal posts.Heterosex and pregnancy creates life; homosexuality and AIDs brings death.
For that matter, is it reasonable to praise the characteristic of "heterosex" to "create life"?
Gay couples can certainly adopt children. Given that world population is about 7 billion, isn't the ability and willingness to take care of the living something we should consider more noble and more deserving of encouragement?
The backers of California's same-sex marriage ban petitioned a federal appeals court Tuesday to review a split decision by three of its judges that struck down Proposition 8, opting for now to avoid taking their chances before the U.S. Supreme Court
Yes. And AIDs can be especially damaging to their health, and well as other STDs and diseases.
Lesbians are less likely than gay men or heterosexuals in getting or passing on the AIDS virus. I have always found this to be rather puzzling in light of the "God's wrath" explaination of AIDS that is often put forward by religious folk.
Perhaps you could offer an explaination?
-z
Lesbians are less likely than gay men or heterosexuals in getting or passing on the AIDS virus. I have always found this to be rather puzzling in light of the "God's wrath" explaination of AIDS that is often put forward by religious folk.
Perhaps you could offer an explaination?
-z
Except when heterosex and pregnancy causes death, and when homosexuality doesn't.
As long as you ignore all of those cases, then what you say is true.
And why do you lump AIDS with homosexuality? One could say all fatal diseases bring death. But AIDS is caused by a virus, and that virus can infect and sicken and kill anyone, not just homosexuals. (And if you believe AIDS is somehow caused by homosexuality, you're just plain wrong. Not as a matter of opinion or interpretation, but wrong as a matter of well-established fact.)
.
Baloney.